Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TANG Pilots for the Truth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:18 PM
Original message
TANG Pilots for the Truth
We, all former pilots of the Texas Air National Guard, have come forward in response to the vicious and irresponsible smear campaign being conducted by proxies of George Bush against John Kerry.

Instead of making up a bunch of hateful lies questioning someone’s bravery and patriotism, we have only a question: Where was George?

For five months in 1972, George W. Bush blew off his duty to his unit and his country. We looked for him. We were waiting for him to show up. But he never showed up.

Where was George?
----------

Of course it's not real! I dreamed of this while napping a few minutes ago. File it under 'Things We Would See in a Just World.' Meanwhile, here in Up-is-Down World, we get the Swifties, easily the lowest, most disgusting mud ever slung in a modern political campaign, even eclipsing the previous benchmark for craven hypocrisy, the wretched treatment of Max Cleland in 2002. These people make me ill.

It says a lot about John Kerry that he has not responded in kind, ala the fantasy above. I would stoop to it, given half a chance. Props to Kerry's campaign for resisting the obvious.

They DO, however, need to criticize Bush for his dereliction of duty. They also need to point out that this same irresponsible man is behind the campaign of lies trumpeted by the Swifties.

They need to say, loudly and very publicly, that George W. Bush, a man who did not fulfill his guard duties, hides behind crooks and conmen to tell lies about his opponent.

Oops, how did that soapbox get under my feet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Brilliant
:wow: Huzzah :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wow. Thank you.
:party:
This concludes my quota of relevant, on-topic posts for today. I think all I have left is Lounge material. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the real story here...............
not Kerry's record, HE SERVED, and bravely.

The real story is George Bush's service record. Why was he allowed to vault over 300 other men to the top of the list in the TANG?

Where are the full records of his service history?

Why cannot ONE person come forth that remembers him in the Alabama National Guard?

Why are these questions not being hammered over and over again on the news outlets?

George Bush is the REAL chickenshit here. He's the REAL treasonous bastard.

If the Swiftboat bastards cared one whit about service records of our candidates they'd be going after Bush for his desertion. Of course that's not their goal. Their goal is to discredit John Kerry, not to discern who is the best candidate based on service to country.

I'm so sick of these assholes questioning Kerry's service record when we have a freakin' DESERTER in the White House! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Full title: Warhero Unfit to Command - We Support Deserting Dictatortot
I'd really love for one journalist to ask these guys what in George Bush's record of service makes HIM fit to command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Amen, and dream on, I guess
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 06:10 PM by Hardhead
And I've noticed a pattern: Bush attacks on the very issues he's weakest on. Or perhaps that's just a coincidence because he's weak on every issue.

But no, seriously, perhaps I'm getting too zen about it, but it seems that he defends his own weaknesses by focusing on Kerry even when the resulting attention can only be bad for him. He's pathological. Attack is his only defense against criticism. My god, what a weak man! Amazing that even today's totally wussified democratic party can't find the nerve to call him a coward in public. It would be his undoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC