Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think that Bush would really attack/invade the rest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:39 PM
Original message
Do you think that Bush would really attack/invade the rest
of the countries on his list "to drain the swamp" now knowing how disasterous that Iraq has been? (Of course that is if he is still in office after November) (GOD FORBID)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I think he's planning an Iran invasion already,
evidence by his "probe" into evidence that Iran has a link to al Qaeda and 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree
I think that the next four years will be filled with war and death if Bush gets reelected. Iran first and then Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes I do.
And if he remains in the White House, we can expect the draft to be reinstated shortly after his second term begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
Bush and his buddies are nutty enough to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tardisian Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, definitely.
This administration has been talking about Iran for the past few weeks; it's just a matter of time before troops are pushed into position there. And if he gets 4 more years, it will also be Syria, and possibly other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Rice & Iran
SHe was on a Sunday talk show going on and on about Iran. I'll find the article and post it. I think they're on the short list.

Cyn:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. What the F***K is going on with the Press AGAIN NOT REPORTING
this assholes intentions, moves, plans and obvious views of the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. no troops
but administration is talking of "bombing" Iran.

Israel volunteered as well.

lovely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. What happened to "If you break it you own it?"
Don't bombs break things????? How do we ignore "Reconstruction" in Iran, when we are all consumed with it in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, he's planning on going after Iran
this guy can't even admit Iraq was a mistake, don't expect him to make the right decision in the future. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. it's all in the PNAC doctrine
they've been upfront about that part of their plan so far.

www.newamericancentury.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rice Says Iran Must Not Be Allowed to Develop Nuclear Arms
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/09/politics/09nuke.html?ex=1092715200&en=c95ce6f723d4a86c&ei=5006&partner=ALTAVISTA1


KENNEBUNKPORT, Me., Aug. 8 - President Bush's national security adviser said Sunday that the United States and its allies "cannot allow the Iranians to develop a nuclear weapon" and warned that President Bush would "look at all the tools that are available to him" to stop Iran's program.

Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, said on the NBC News program "Meet the Press" that she expected that the International Atomic Energy Agency would make what she called "a very strong statement" in September forcing Iran to choose between isolation or the abandonment of its nuclear weapons efforts. But she stopped short of saying whether the United States could muster its allies to impose sanctions against Iran in the United Nations Security Council.

Until now, European powers and Russia have resisted American efforts to impose sanctions against Iran, which they see as a major trading partner.

Iran has insisted that its nuclear effort is entirely for the production of electric power, though the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear monitoring agency, has found evidence of covert efforts, stretching back more than 18 years, to produce highly enriched uranium suitable primarily for weapons production.

A week ago, Iran's foreign minister, Kamal Kharrazi, said his country would resume producing parts for centrifuges, the equipment needed to enrich uranium, because European nations had not brought the Atomic Energy Agency's investigations to a close.

President Bush, who took a brief break from his re-election campaign to attend a family wedding here and visit his parents, said nothing in public on Sunday. He attended an early-morning church service, went fishing with members of his family and flew back to Washington, letting his aides take the questions about Iraq, terrorism, Iran and North Korea.

Ms. Rice was responding to an article in The New York Times on Sunday that said the Bush administration's flurry of diplomatic efforts during the past 20 months to stop the progress of nuclear weapons programs in Iran and North Korea had so far failed.

In a veiled reference to the Clinton administration, Ms. Rice said "these are problems that developed in 1990's." She contended that there had been "diplomatic successes" in organizing North Korea's neighbors to confront the problem and spurring action against Iran at the Vienna-based Atomic Energy Agency.

"It was, in fact, the president who really put this on the agenda in his State of the Union address, the famous 'axis of evil' address," Ms. Rice said. "And our allies have really begun to respond."

She declined to say whether the United States would support action by Israel, which says Iran's program poses a particular threat to its national security, to attack Iran's facilities the way it attacked the Osirak reactor in Iraq in 1981.

"I think that I don't want to get into hypotheticals on this," Ms. Rice said. "I do think that there are very active efforts under way, for instance, to undermine the ability of the Iranians under the cover of civilian nuclear cooperation to get the components that would help them for nuclear weapons developments."

She said Russia had declared that it would provide help to Iran only if it returned its nuclear fuel to Russia so it could not be diverted for weapons. "I think you cannot allow the Iranians to develop a nuclear weapon," she said. "The international community has got to find a way to come together and to make certain that that does not happen."

Ms. Rice's answer about Israel was particularly notable because, in the period before the war in Iraq, she and other senior administration officials said history had vindicated the Israeli raid on Osirak. Had that attack not crippled Iraq's main nuclear reactor, they argued, Saddam Hussein might have had access to nuclear weapons before the Persian Gulf war in 1991.

But it is unclear that Israel has the military capacity to reach Iran's nuclear sites, which are much farther away and well hidden among cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. They will say Iran attacked Iraq and we will have to "defend"
our fledgling colony in Iraq by invading Iran from both sides (Afghanistan and Iraq).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not any more, having thrown our military and our money down Iraq hole
He surely thought he would be marching on another easy victory by now, having won a bloodless victory in Iraq and shown us how he protected the US. But with 140,000 troops in Iraq, and a couple hundred billion spent, on invading and occupying the weakest of all potential targets, he has made sure the US can't even engage in any other war, worthwhile or not. Iran is a big ass country, relatively, and Syria has a military that wasn't destroyed in 1980, and North Korea could turn Seoul into rubble with conventional artillery before Bush could stop it.

Thanks, Bush, for tying down our military for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Without Question. This man and his cronies are capable
of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Absolutely, the man is an idiot. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes. And then they will come for us.
Enjoy your sanitarium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC