Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michigan and Florida.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 02:15 AM
Original message
Poll question: Michigan and Florida.
Should we change our party's rules at some time in future because of what is happening in those two states? I hardly ever agree with the repub party but I do think that to avoid this mess ever again we should not take away all delegates but split them in half. I am unsure if we should change the rules right now but at some point the DNC really should think about this rule and if it needs to be changed or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, The Rule Already Is That You Only Get 50%
and that the rules committee can enact further sanctions. Perhaps the further sanctions should be specified. And I do think we should enact rules specifying what actions a candidate must take and feel that all candidates should be required to take their name off the ballot if possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Correct
Edited on Fri May-23-08 03:23 AM by dbmk
Rule 20.C.1a of the Delegate Selection Plan already states that the default sanction against timing violations (moving your primary up before an allowed date) is 50% and stripping the supers.

Rule 20.C.5 and 6 then specify that further sanctions can be imposed as the comittee sees fit.

So the basis for the poll is a bit misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. See my post #19 below. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Count Florida, boot Michigan, end of story. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. But it isn't the voters' faults.
Why punish the voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why Isn't It Their Fault?
Who elected the people who broke the rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You're right. Next time we'll all just vote repub.
Do you not realize that we, like you, have limited choices when voting? And how were we to know these idiots would do this?

Please think before blaming the voters for this one. Believe me when I say that there will be consequences for our politicians' actions. The problem is that it will probably mean a repub governor and state legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Good, You Fix That
In the meantime, don't attempt to make the rest of us victims of an unfair counting of votes. It cannot be fair when candidates are not permitted to campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. So now you're even willing to eat Obama supporters in this lust for vengence.
I support Obama. What I'm trying to tell you and the other one who thinks it's a good idea to fling insults at the entire voting populace of Michigan is that we didn't fucking know they were going to pull this bullshit till it was too late to stop.

Now if you want to continue your drive to exorcise everyone but the pure of blood from the Democratic rolls, they by all means go ahead. I'll still vote Dem because I know better than to let some anonymous poster with blood in his mouth to chase me away. Others won't.

Michigan is a swing state. It's only those of us who are motivated to get to the polls that keep it turning blue. Because of that, I'd strongly suggest a compromise that doesn't affect the final results.

Or the Dems can go with your suggestion and just lose the election. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. All action has consequences. The voters knew the situation before polling so...
...if they choose to fight back by voting for the other party in their own state, so be it. They're the ones who will have to live with that decision. If they throw the GE then we'll ALL live with it including the Michigan voters. Sometimes people need to rise above the political fray and vote their hearts and minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. We ALL have to live with the decision if Michigan turns red.
And it's never that far from turning red.

I'll agree that people need to rise above the political fray, one way to do that is it not insult millions of people for the actions of a few. As it stands, we'll probably elect repubs across the board next election because of this debacle. Would you like a repub president to go with that? Easy to do if Michigan turns, believe me, and insults only depress voter turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The voters had more than a year, knowing the consequences and they did nothing.
They made their bed, and refused to change the sheets despite a year of warning.

Now, they have to lie in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. No one is blaming the voters. But you must admit that the results are...
strangely skewed in favor of ONE particular candidate whos name was the only choice on the ballot. How can that possibly be fair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. This Michigander wants to say something to you.....
But what I have to say may get me in trouble. Trust me.....it would not have been pretty. But I will just have to withhold all that I wish to say to people like you who think we don't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I have my opinion, you have yours. Have it your way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Thanks...I will retain my opinion
and hopefully get my way. In other words...I hope I will get my vote counted and not be disenfranchised from the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes - IN THE FUTURE
Right now I see no justification for seating the delegates. When I voted here in Florida it was with full knowledge that my vote wouldn't count, so I voted for the person whose policies I liked best - Kucinich - rather than for one I thought could actually win. And Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan.

Changing the rules now would be grossly unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progetto Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. more than unfair,
it's a risk for the DNC of loosing control of the primary process.

While a full seating MI and FL should help unify the party in Denver, it's would also be an invitation for other states to schedule their primaries independently of the party. Absent any consequences, what's to stop them.

A bad thing ?
MI & FL wanted to be more relevant to the process and have an early caucus/primary in the way Iowa and NH do. Unfortunately, if more states move their schedule up, these primaries start to look like a national election. A mega super tuesday. Only candidates with mega dollars and/or national recognition will be able compete.

Personally, I like the state to state campaign. Let's me evaluate the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. So now is the time to fix things?
Clinton is also doing this with another one of her mistakes in Iraq.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. No. I think the system worked well. It was just two rogue states that caused grief.
Michigan and Florida were going to pull this bullshit regardless of what rules were in place so I don't think we can blame the SDs. As for splitting them in half or taking them away or any other idea, none of that matters.

The only punishment that will really affect MI and FL without risking the general election too much, is to seat the delegates while ensuring that their votes can't affect the final results. This takes away the power the local politicians were craving but gives them no excuse to come back to their states saying they didn't get to vote.

Anything other than that will break the DNC, and regardless of what anyone thinks of Howard Dean if we break the DNC we break the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. Rules have to exist...and the 50% penalty is still an option
My thinking is that the R&B Committee will remove the 100% sanction and reinstate the 50% one. Just how they allocate those delegates is still a question however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Perhaps
Preferably not during the most important election of the new century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. Other
Edited on Fri May-23-08 07:35 AM by IWantAnyDem
I say if a state violates the primary calendar, all delegates are seated and have full votes except in all votes cast for matters related to credentials and all votes for president and vice-president.

In those votes, neither pledged nor unpledged get any vote whatsoever.

Furthermore, no delegate from a state that violates the primary calendar should sit on any committee. If a delegate sits on an existing committee when their state violates, they are immediately removed and replaced with a delegate from a state which did not violate the primary calendar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. Other: Completely revamp the primary system
Have a pre-primary with randomly selected regions of states that match the demographics of the US when combined followed by whole state primaries every three weeks with groups of randomly selected states that are diverse in population and demographics. Change the pre-primary regions each cycle and rotate the order of the groups of states. Everyone will eventually get a chance to be among the first. If a state jumps the gun, no delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC