Bush hired an investigator in 1999 to find out what might be out there

[Hamlette]

against him. I guess the investigator couldn't turn up anything. If you hadn't done anything wrong, why would you need an investigator? Do we not exploit this because our guys do it too?

I've often wondered why the Dems didn't say anything about this. Challenge Bush and ask him why he had to hire someone.

We need an attack dog outfit like the swift boat loonies. Couldn't we just make an ad that has a bunch of bimbos saying they'd slept with Bush, had his baby, total bull shit and run it?

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

1. The investigator should be sued for incompetance.

Paul Lukasiak is doing the good work on exposing, in a measured and scientific manner, the truths, the ugly truths, of Dear Leader's TXANG "career", such as it was.

Lemme put it this way: if you or I had done what Dear Leader did, we would have learned the secret verses to "Jailhouse Rock. In Leavenworth.

[wurzel]

2. Was this the same "investigator' who picked his VP? n/t

[justgamma]

3. You think, maybe,

Shrub couldn't remember what he did? Needed to find a PI to find out for him.

[Literate Tar Heel]

4. actually, I think it's fairly standard procedure these days

all candidates know that their opposition will be hiring detectives to dig up dirt so they want to know ahead of time what could possibly be coming out