Bush is such a coward

[Johnny B. Goode]

In a few of his "speeches" at his private rallies he challenged John Kerry to come and defend himself after calling him a "flip-flopper".

Bush is a spineless coward.

In a real debate, he'd be torn limb from limb.

But his delusional supporters think better of him when they see BS like that. "You hear that? Bush just challenged John Kerry! He's so brave!"

Like he'd actually challenge Kerry to a debate.

That imbecile is parading around the country talking about America's Heart and Soul, yet all he's done is make America a better place for his filthy rich friends. The rich are all he cares about. They're his "base".

And they're attacking KERRY'S military record! Kerry VOLUNTEERED!!! Bush can't even proved he served in the National Guard that he bought his way into!!!

But he'll never admit to ever doing anything wrong, because he's too weak and stupid to defend himself.

What a moron!

[Nite Owl]

1. Since Kerry and * will both

be in Portland on Friday Kerry should tell him to meet him for a debate. Then we can watch the * weasel out of that one real fast. Bring it on!

[flordehinojos]

4. Yeah,

Kerry should say, "I will be at the corner of such-and-such and such-and-such a time. I will meet you there to answer any questions you want to ask directly of me" ...... shrub would either not show up, or if he did, those people allowed near the corner would have to hold their noses from the smell in shrubbie's pants! weasley coward that he is!
:P

[Domitan]

2. Bush is Percy Wetmore

Remember that weaselly guard from the movie, "The Green Mile".

[opihimoimoi]

3. I luv it, the guy with the rich aunt who pissed in his pants when put on

the electric driven pony outside K mart.

[kentuck]

5. That is funny !

Percy Wetmore ?? :)

[Feanorcurufinwe]

6. Why is Bush afraid to answer Kerry's questions?

Bush, whose administration cited the weapons and alleged terrorist links to justify the war, challenged the Democratic presidential nominee on Friday at a campaign rally in Stratham, N.H., to tell voters whether intelligence disclosures since the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 would have altered his position on the war. ''My opponent hasn't answered the question of whether, knowing what we know now, he would have supported going into Iraq," Bush said. ''The American people deserve a clear yes-or-no answer."

In response, Kerry, distinguishing between invading Iraq and authorizing the action said, ''Yes, I would have voted for the authority. I believe it was the right authority for a president to have." Kerry has said the decision to invade rested with the president.

Then, in his most direct challenge to Bush about the war, Kerry listed four questions for the president, inquiring about prewar intelligence, postwar planning, the lack of efforts to bring other nations into the war as allies, and why Americans were misled about the war.

And unlike Bush, who never mentioned Kerry by name during his New Hampshire campaign stop, the Massachusetts senator said, ''My question to President Bush is: Why did he rush to war without a plan to win the peace? Why did he rush to war on faulty intelligence and not do the hard work necessary to give America the truth? Why did he mislead America about how he would go to war? Why has he not brought other countries to the table in order to support American troops in the way that we deserve it and relieve a pressure from the American people?

''There are four not-hypothetical questions -- like the president's -- (but) real questions that matter to Americans, and I hope you'll get the answers to those questions, because the American people deserve them," Kerry said.
http://tinyurl.com/3k2js