Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama and Clinton need to sponsor or support the anti-cluster bomb initiative. Who's with me?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 04:52 PM
Original message
Obama and Clinton need to sponsor or support the anti-cluster bomb initiative. Who's with me?
It's very telling when we're in a boat with RUSSIA and CHINA refusing to ban cluster bombs.
I think Obama and Clinton need to make a stand and show their dove credentials.
THERE IS NO REASON FOR US TO USE CIVILIAN BUTCHERING CLUSTER BOMBS.
IF OBAMA AND CLINTON WANT TO SHOW THEIR COMMITMENT TO PEACE, THEY NEED TO SHOW A WILLINGNESS TO PUT AN END TO OUR USE OF CLUSTER BOMBS. MORE THAN 100 OTHER COUNTRIES ARE DOING IT - WHY CAN'T WE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. ME!
I thought there was a vote on this recently -- am I thinking of something else?

IS there a current initiative?

Thanks for any info. :hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. There is, I believe, a bill that is languishing but has already been sponsored by multiple dems.
Obama and Clinton have not sponsered, but the sponsorship of either would lend a lot of weight to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. But Hillary voted against the
cluster bomb ban previously...I'm not so sure she can support it now, w/out looking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. then that's pathetic. hope obama can do better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. yep, pathetic...
proves my point that in trying to appear "tough on terror" she voted for political gain, not her head or her heart...IMO
interesting blog here

http://mediabloodhound.typepad.com/weblog/2008/02/hillary-vs-obam.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. When was that? I think that's what I'm thinking of.
Do you recall when the vote was? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. link.
Edited on Fri May-30-08 05:27 PM by RazBerryBeret
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You have linked to a bill on foreign trade. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And..how did Obama vote on it? Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Obama = nay
Edited on Fri May-30-08 05:27 PM by RazBerryBeret
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Same link. Foreign trade. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. so sorry...
I was trying to find the actual roll call of the vote, so it's not a biased blog.
having trouble finding it it's Senate Amendment No. 4882...
I'll keep looking--but I just ordered a pizza, in case it comes, I'm gone...
hehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I think it does need to be posted.
The blog piece on this issue has an incomplete link.

Pizza? Did someone say pizza?

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. FOUND IT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Congratulations!
Enjoy your pie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. You have it backwards - Obama is yea, Clinton is nay
Edited on Fri May-30-08 05:40 PM by karynnj
look at your own link

Of the people thinking of running for President at the time (in the Senate) only Kerry and Obama had the courage and integrity to vote for the ban over the desires of AIPAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. yes, I did switch it around
you are correct.
sorry!!

yay for Obama and Kerry...
but I don't know why someone would vote that cluster bombs are ok...
like I said I came across photos proving that they CLEARLY are not ok...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. And I agree with you - I really can't understand why
anyone would have difficulty defending the vote that Obama made. If you scan the list, many Democratic vets, voted for the ban. They are the ones who I see as knowing the true cost to the soldiers. Consider that if we consider them legal, some soldier somewhere will be given a direct order to drop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. good on Obama but there's a fight on now that he needs to have a voice in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. exaxtly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. yep...there was an amendment for the Ban
in 2006---it was defeated.
30 to 70...that disgusts me....

and while researching this I came across some photos regarding cluster bombs that I never want to see again...
how could you vote against this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Those things have to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. Absolutely. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. don't make me laugh, she voted against a bill sponsered by Feinstein banning them
her voting record is what she is all about, WAR, if she thinks it will help her political ambitions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC