Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Deserter"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:18 PM
Original message
"Deserter"


SUMMARY



An examination of the Bush military files within the context of US Statutory Law, Department of Defense regulations, and Air Force policies and procedures of that era lead to a single conclusion: George W. Bush was considered a deserter by the United States Air Force.



After Bush quit TXANG, he still had nine months of his six-year military commitment left to serve. As a result, Bush became a member of the Air Force Reserves and was transferred to the authority of the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) in Denver, Colorado. Because this was supposed to be a temporary assignment, ARPC had to review Bush’s records to determine where he should ultimately be assigned. That examination would have led to three conclusions: That Bush had “failed to satisfactorily participate” as defined by United States law and Air Force policy, that TXANG could not account for Bush’s actions for an entire year, and that Bush’s medical records were not up to date. Regardless of what actions ARPC contemplated when reviewing Bush’s records, all options required that Bush be certified as physically fit to serve, or as unfit to serve. ARPC thus had to order Bush to get a physical examination, for which Bush did not show up. ARPC then designated Bush as AWOL and a “non-locatee” (i.e. a deserter) who had failed to satisfactorily participate in TXANG, and certified him for immediate induction through his local draft board. Once the Houston draft board got wind of the situation, strings were pulled; and documents were generated which directly contradict Air Force policy, and which were inconsistent with the rest of the records released by the White House.

http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm

This is a thorough breakdown of AWOL Shrub! I found this site link though another helpful site that holds the media's feet to the fire! http://www.tvnewslies.org/news/#politics

use it in good health!:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good Find!
Thanks for sharing!



:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Which 'mainstream' reporter or news outlet would be most likely
to push the story again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Surely some reporter out there wants some publicity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Mainstream media will need to be pressured.
We know to well they wont do much to show shrub in a bad light. It will take something to force them into it, say someone within the campaign structure somehow making his AWOL status a topic of discussion. Otherwise don't hold your breath. The media is in lockstep with this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I get that what I'm wondering is who is mostly to respond to the pressure?
Edited on Sun Aug-15-04 08:40 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, When this first broke...
last week by an underground reporter who pain stakingly went thru the endless documents and found the break, 1 of the major newspapers or news outlets said they would check all of his research themselves and go from there. I forget who it was, i'm thinking NY Times but I may be off base. Perhaps someone else here can weigh in.

I don't have much time as of now to search anything out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicking
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zuzu98 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good info to use w/ media contact list
Maybe someone will follow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keirsey Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "fair and balanced"?
Ask the media why they didn't give "Deserter" (released in July) the same coverage that they've given "Unfit for Duty".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. we all know the answer to that
I wouldn't expect an answer from the media though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I have an idea...
Since he owes the US and the American people about 7 months duty for being AWOL. I say after he's voted out, he can fulfill his obligation and finish up his National Guard requirement in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thaaat's right

Then he can be a real Mission Accomplished Hero
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimchi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Great find.
Everyone should take a look at this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC