Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do You Think Bush* Was AWOL From His Air National Guard Obligations?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 01:32 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do You Think Bush* Was AWOL From His Air National Guard Obligations?
Also... you may have heard of this site already... but there may be others who haven't yet visited it. It's very thorough and can be a bit tedious to read because of how detailed the author is... but it's very compelling once you get into it.

THE AWOL PROJECT: An Examination of the Bush Military Files (http://www.glcq.com/)

-- Allen



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, definitely
Edited on Sun Aug-15-04 01:40 PM by flordehinojos
in the same way that he was AWOL from his President of the United States post the morning of 9/11 when he "DECIDED TO LET THE PROGRAM RUN OUT".

Which program one might ask him since those are his words--the school function he was attending? or, the attack on U.S. targets in which, I believe, Bush was complicit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keirsey Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. tomorrow
Dubya is speaking tomorrow at the VFW* convention in Cincinnati. Hope that there are some very big signs about the AWOL issue.

*Veterans of Foreign Wars: An organization that * can't join.



This administration’s disappointing budget request once again renews our call for mandatory funding for veterans’ health care. As the Presidential Task Force to Improve Health Care Delivery for Our Nation’s Veterans noted, there is a fundamental mismatch between the increasing demand for veterans’ health care and the administration’s and Congress’ ability to provide financial resources. As this nation’s veterans’ population grows even older, this demand will escalate, worsening this mismatch.


http://www.vfwdc.org/NLS/Testimony/2004/cinc.htm





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. The NERVE of that SOB
to USE the VFW as a backdrop in his campaign. I hope they stone him. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. By definition, definitely
AWOL

adjective {after verb} ABBREVIATION FOR

absent without leave: describes a member of the armed forces who is away without permission:

- The pilot is serving 22 days detention for going AWOL.

from http://www.freesearch.co.uk/dictionary/awol

A particularly apt useage example n'est-ce pas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have corresponded with Paul Lukasiak.
Based on my own national guard, experience I sent him some information and suggested a couple of directions he might look in.

He was very cordial and appreciative. The man has done monumental research and uncovered material that I thought would be buried forever. I believe he is entirely credible.
p.s. Don't look for this on CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. AWOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, but
I think he may have been guilty of desertion, even though he can't be charged with that at this late date, and conceivably he could have offered his narcotics addiction as a legitimate excuse.

AWOL for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lagniappe Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Definitely AWOL.
If Bush had a scintilla of documentation that proved his service, Fox News would be trumpeting the fact 24/7. Bush is the commander-in-chief for Christ's sake, and he can't find his military records.

Bush is a coward, and I am more inclined to believe he is a deserter. AWOL is much to kind a label for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Will the two that voted 'no'
Please come forward and prove the rest of us wrong?
Dare ya :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I Have A Theory Or Two About Those Two "No" Votes...
1) They are in deep denial.
2) Screwballs who always vote contrary just to skew polls.
3) They misunderstood the question.
4) They haven't examined the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yup......What you said
You forgot number 5) Chicken shits that can't or won't back up what they think they know.
Like my Momma dun use'ta tol'me....
It's impossible to back up a mockingbird mouth with a hummingbird ass.
ha ha :evilgrin:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Do you think the Pope is Catholic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. Yes, Likely
There's a chance that he's Jewish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. He Cannot Recall What He Did?
Edited on Sun Aug-15-04 03:15 PM by erpowers
One of Bush's explanations about his Guard service is that he can only vaguely remember being in the Guard and that he cannot remember what he did. I do not buy this. If someone is in the National Guard or the military they will remember what they did when they were with their unit. I do not care if it is twenty years later, the person will at least remember one thing and one person who was over them. It is impossible to go through a period and not remember the name of one person you served with. Even if you were an alcoholic or a drug addict you will have to remember someone or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It's a pretty significant event in someones life.
You'd think he'd be able to recall just a little bit more than he does.

Hell in the 1980's my Grandpoppa use to tell me stories of World War one and two. And I still remember many of those stories he told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerryvov Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. AWOL?
One of Bush's explanations about his Guard service is that he can only vaguely remember being in the Guard and that he cannot remember what he did

Bullshit...I went through bootcamp at Parris Island in 1956 and served three years in the Marines...I may not recall every single day's events but I damn sure know where I was and what I was doing and I remember a lot of my buddies. He's a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. He is a liar.
It's just one of the many techniques they use in their massive "Spin" machine. I just do not understand why the media does not NAIL him on this. I guess I'm just that naive to think that they would even TRY! It pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. How hard do you think
it would be to get hold of someone who SAW YOU THERE? :evilgrin:

$10,000 has been offered to ANYONE who can place the *dauphin where he should have been, when he should have been there. UNCOLLECTED.

Things that make you go hmmmmmmmm......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. Self Indulgent Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. flight physical is MUCH more important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. When I was in Germany
We did flight physicals. It's been some years ago, but I honestly can't remember one not showing up. Once in a blue moon they would reschedule. Those guys were nuts about flying. It was everything to them and keeping their flight status was a major priority.

I add that these were chinook, blackhawk and huey pilots.

I can't see it being that much different for jet pilots.

Cyn:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Without a doubt. AWOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. flight phys is MORE important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. Absolutely
He wasn't there, didn't want to be there, would have been thrilled to never go again.

Although I'm still not sure it's technically, legally, AWOL. All the legal jargon and rules and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Not if his obligations involved

pony kegs and eight balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. flight physical is MUCH more important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Is There Any Doubt?
And if there were any doubt, there is still the question of why Bush failed to take his flight physical.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Bending over backwards to give him the benefit of the tiniest doubt
I still vote "probably." Why every other person in the U.S. doesn't see the obvious problems with shrub's military record gaps and lies and missed physicals is beyond me.

Mass hypnosis? Something in the water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Mass Self-Hypnosis comes closest
My sense of it is that people have been lead to believe that Bush is some kind of hero of 9/11, and they buy into it because it make them feel safer to believe that our President is a hero rather than a zero.

You would think he was out there pulling people from the wreckage, saving victims, and personally kicking terrorist ass with his very own hands.

Obviously, no one has actually said this, but the image has settled in with so many people because they have heard it on the news that Bush pulled us through 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. come ON! it's so obvious, your're doing a CSTFFTT bit
MEDIA are STILL ignoring it, even after the swift boat fiasco BEGS them to start covering it again

I can't BELIEVE they're still ignoring it, as well as giving those LIARS the edge, forcing Kerry to prove HE's not lying, instead of making those aholes PROVE their assertions

not to mention, they pretty much ignore the provenance of their money, Corsi's freepness, ONeill's insistance he voted for GORE!

egregious stuff like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. I agree that the media's coverage is disgraceful
The WH would not get away with these lies without the complicity of the media. The state of journalism in this country is far more worrisome that shrub's presidency, as bad as that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. As far as I can see, we agree
Edited on Mon Aug-16-04 12:23 AM by demwing2
What part of the forest do you think I'm missing? :)

I blame the media in part, but I also blame the people who will swallow whatever they are fed without once questioning the source or motivation of their information masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC