Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Review Composite (8-17-03): Kerry 321, Bush 217

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:37 AM
Original message
Federal Review Composite (8-17-03): Kerry 321, Bush 217


http://www.federalreview.com/compositepoll.htm

KERRY LEADS, BUT ITS FAR FROM OVER
Bush 47.6% – 217 EV | Kerry 50.7% – 321 EV
EV without Toss Up states (under 2% margin): Bush 211| Kerry 291| Toss 36
August 17, 2004

Last week I wondered if it was time for the Bush campaign and its supporters to move on to other things. Electing Senators and Congressman. Anticipating the new season of Enterprise. Writing letters to NBC to replace the Bartlet Administration with Tom Selleck as a Republican president.

After all, Bush has now trailed in the Composite Poll every week since July 13 and has only led three times since May 18. And last week, Kerry had his biggest lead, at over 3.5 points. But some guy named Don reminds us on our comment pages: Dukakis was up 17 at this time in the election cycle. History tells us that Bushes gain 25 over Massachusetts paleoliberals from this time to election day. It's always nice to remember history and that Kerry was Dukakis' lieutenant governor.

So, what about history? Gerry Daly talks about Bush's lead over Gore in 2000 at this point between conventions, noting that in his analysis of state polling, Bush led in states worth 346 electoral votes. In case you forgot, it was a bit closer than that as Bush hauled in only 271. In this week's Federal Review analysis, Kerry is not doing as well as the challenger in 2000, with only 321 electoral votes.

(more)

P.S. As Kerry pads his stats, the conservative that runs this site is getting testier and testier! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. WAHOOOO, finally a map that gets the colors right!
Red is reserved for the challenging party. Blue is reserved for the incumbent party.

Methinks some freeper heads will explode when they start seeing blue in all the "wrong" states on a Tuesday night in November.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Good point...unfortunately, I'm still used to Dem=Blue...
Oh well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Comparing it to 2000 or 1988 is BUNK and so are the rest of his proBush co
Edited on Tue Aug-17-04 08:53 AM by Zynx
mments. Both of those cases had challenger versus challenger rather than incumbent versus challenger.

Also, he's wrong about the 2.6% second quarter GDP model because Gerry Ford got 3.4% growth that quarter and poppy got 3.8%. He's lying.

Also, Gallup is the only one showing him with more than 50% approval rating and Gallup is a BS outlier poll as we have proven before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. This map should match up ptetty much
with the education map, blue being bad. As Clinton said " When people think We Win".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC