Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To the Obama suporters who address threads, "To the Clinton Supporters who..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:50 PM
Original message
To the Obama suporters who address threads, "To the Clinton Supporters who..."
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 03:59 PM by onehandle
Cut it out. Obama won.

You're just stirring up shit over an almost non-existent minority at DU as an excuse to bash Clinton and her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. You didn't finish the final line
To the Obama supporters who keep posting "to the Clinton supporters"

The way I would have ended that lines is - stfad

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Do the Clinton supporters ...
who are still upset realize they were taken for a very long ride for nothing? ... It's like a married man wining and dining you ... taking you on a cruise ... promising you the world ... ALL the while knowing that he's spending somebody else's money and it'll be over in a few weeks ... Finally he steps away and says "Wow, that was fun, but it was just really a few months of self-indulgent escapism ... I always meant to go back to my wife eventually... thanks for the good times, BABE" ...

Hillary spent 30 million dollars she didn't have to prove what we've all know for months ... Obama was the candidate then and he's the candidate now ...

If anyone wants to be angry (which is a waste of time and emotion) take it up with the woman who perpetuated this fantasy ... Hillary ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Do the Obama people realize more people went to the polls for her than for him?
At the end of the day, more people wanted her than him. No one could have realized that the democratic party would usurp the people's will just like Katherine Harris did in 2000.

Pull the real clear politics link all you want. NOTHING changes that the biggest number on that page is for HER and not him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That "18 million/popular vote" spin is a bunch of bullshit, and you know it.
Hillogical math requires that you count all primary states, NO caucus states, and give Hillary all her votes in Michigan, but no votes for Obama.

It's not reflective of reality. Nor is the idea that Hillary had any chance of winning after Wisconsin. It was irresponsible (and arrogant) of her to string her supporters along like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. NOpe
it does estimate caucus states where real votes weren't given.

Correct, it does not give him any votes for Michigan, as he got no votes in Michigan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. So the Soviet Union was a thriving democracy in your world. Great.
I don't suppose you're the least discomforted over the fact that by being practically the only name on the ballot, 265,000 people still showed up to vote against her? If even one tenth of the uncommitted votes were Obama supporters, that "popular vote" myth is history. It's spin, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. In the Soviet Union, people weren't allowed to put their name on a ballot without permission.
In America, candidates can apparently make free choices for political gain and then cry "Soviet Union!" later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Make shit up as you go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. When are we ever going to let this subject go?
For one thing, those estimates for the caucus states are just that, estimates that may be accurate or may not. But the main point is that we have got to once and for all put this popular vote thing behind us. If we continue to hear that Clinton won the popular vote, whether it's really true or not, it's going to make Senator Obama a weaker candidate in November. We can't let that happen, so please let's stop this stuff about the popular vote. It doesn't help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. It's over ...
They can keep dwelling on Hillary's talking points ... Hey, she did a great job of getting everybody all geared up for NOTHING ... that was THEN, this is NOW ... HILLARY is voting for OBAMA ... HILLARY is now an OBAMA supporter ... she is working for OBAMA ...

MOVING ON ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Bullshiite,Dudeness. Fuzzy Math replaced by Billary Metrics
total horseshiite,get over it,or double down on the EFFEXOR-XR
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. I Have been a delegate to 2 National Conventions and attended
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 06:19 PM by GalleryGod
2 others as Alternate,and

POPULAR VOTE MEANS HORSESHITTE ! Delegates,Delegates,Delegates.
Write that in your bluebook 300X
Double down on your Effexor-XR dosage.
Hand in your blue book and report to the Academic Dean*








*GFY

:nopity: :nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. nobody's claiming she should be given the nomination
based on having the popular vote. Nobody has EVER said that.

But it does mean that you guys really should show a little more humility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. What do you think happened
to all of those arguments earlier in the season that the super delegates really should reflect THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!? Shhhh. Maybe if we are relly, really quiet we will be able to hear the echo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Jimmy Carter was one of the super-delegates who supported OBAMA ...
Many will probably follow suit ... hey, it's over ... if you want to change the process the time to do it is BEFORE the primary ... not after ... everyone knew at EASTER that the delegate count was for OBAMA ...

HILLARY is for OBAMA and she has asked all of her supporters to fight for OBAMA as hard as they fought for her ... question is will you? ... if you can't get behind her request for the good of the country then coming here and TYPING is just a tantrum ... nothing more ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Did that answer my question?
What ever happened to the cry that the super delegates should follow the will of the people...The cry for that on THIS board. What does Jimmy Carter have to do with the Obama supporters who were so vocal about that here just a few months ago? I was one, actually, who argued that the super delegates should be free to decide for themselves whom they will support.

I have, by the way, been vocal about supporting Senator Obama. After the 11 win run he had, I went to the Obama forum to congratulate his supporters and to say that, if he did indeed win the nomination, i would gladly join them.

I have addressed other Clinton supporters who were very disappointed and wondering if they could support him and told them that, in my opinion, we cannot contribute to a McCain win.

Don't lecture me on how to be a Democrat, and don't talk to me about tantrums unless you are sure about what my motives are.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. The superdelegates do reflect the will of the people ..
50% of this country will NOT vote for a CLINTON for any reason ... they've shot themselves in the foot over and over again ... listen to this man ... really listen ... He is reflecting the will of the people ... he's not participating in the fantasy that HILLARY was playing out these last few months ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/audio/2008/jun/04/freedland.carter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. You do, I assume,
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 09:37 PM by polmaven
have some proof that 50% of this country will NOT vote for a CLINTON for any reason....other than the man who has a grudge to settle against the Clintons, that is?

Oh, and the convention is Democrats only, so....it is the will of Democrats only that was being discussed, not "of this country".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I asked you to listen ...
If you don't have any respect for President Carter or his opinions or the poll he quoted, all of which are quite valid, then why bother commenting ... you are indulging in a tantrum that leads nowhere and has no purpose in relevant politics today ... enjoy ... even Hillary has moved on ... when will you? ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. I did listen. I have heard it before as well.
Again...Senator obama was not my first choice, but I have said time and time again that, now that he is the obvious nominee, I will support as vigorously as I supported Senator Clinton.

What I will NOT do is sit by and watch as people continue to attack President and Senator Clinton with uncorroborated claims and charges. President Carter has not ever been happy with the Clintons, particularly because he was not part of the inner circle in the Clinton White House. When I am deciding to whom I will listen, i will always chose those who have the fewest issues.

Also, again, do not lecture me on how to be a good Democrat. I was born a Democrat and I will die a Democrat, as my mother before me. i will always defend a Democrat - any Democrat - against lies,innuendos, and unfair attacks. It is what Democratic family members do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. sounds to me ..
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 11:33 PM by Veronica.Franco
like you'll defend a Clinton Democrat ... but not President Carter ... his word is no good with you ... YOU have the right to lecture and condescend as if your "I, I, I," carries some kind of mysterious weight different from mine or others ... you want to call them "uncorroborated claims" because you chose sides with the Clintons ... President Carter cares nothing for "inner circles" anymore then I do ... the Clintons destroyed their reputation with a long drunk into egotism and now they've given themselves a helluva hangover ... pass the aspirin bottle on to them when you've taken your share ... ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. President Carter's word is good with me
when it is not tainted with a bias he has held for a decade and a half. President Carter was not invited to the White House for consultations and has held it against President Clinton since. So you will forgive me if I do not automatically take his word when it comes to the Clintons...Well, no, may you won't. you are apparently too righteous for that.

I will also...and have....by the way, criticized both Bill and Hillary Clinton when I think it is appropriate. What I don't do is simply jump to the conclusion that because their name is Clinton, they are automatically corrupt and wrong.

I will also defend myself against accusations and charges that are just flat out incorrect, but made twice.

I am really, really looking forward to noon tomorrow when untrue accusations against other DUers will not be tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. but it doesn't matter- rules are rules and it's the delegates that count
that's just the way it is...


He ran a good and clever campaign and won the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
56. Got that right
Hillary DID win the majority of votes--and thus, the will of the people. Gee, guess the DNC is more worried about the far left elements in their party than a fair process.

There was a time in the democratic party, where fairness matters. Now they are no better than the republican machine; i.e.; putting up with vile and rude supporters, and the whole flawed DNC process.


If the DNC is now worried about their candidate getting out votes; guess what--it's on him; as the nomininee, not Clinton or her supporters to back him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Ummm, yea .. a practically equal number of people voted
for each candidate, so it's hardly the runaway some of you radical Obama fans believe it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Delegates ...
It was never based on popular vote ... that was part of the Hillary Romance that she was selling ... she had NO chance of winning the nomination for months now and she herself stated on SATURDAY that she is NOW and always had intended to support OBAMA ... time to pull together for the good of the country ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. You should take your own advice.
And again, half of the people who voted in the Democratic Primaries voted for Hillary Clinton.

Obama is not the overwhelming choice you want everyone to think he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. It doesn't matter what you or I think ... it's over ...
EVEN Hillary is asking YOU to let it go and get behind her fight for OBAMA ... will you do it or do you want to whine? ... your choice ... the fight has moved on to the main event ... are you capable of moving with it? ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #33
51. wrong
she had a chance to win until last Tuesday. I just don't understand why you guys lie about this so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
59. Obama is the nominee
And the primaries are over. This bs you are posting is nothing but an attack on a sitting Democratic Senator.
Your objectives are suspect. Your assumptions are assumptions. Did you know, for example, that Ted Kennedy went to the convention over 600 delegates behind sitting Democratic President Carter, Kennedy tried to steal delegates on the floor of the convention? It is called politics. Sounds like you are new to the game. Hillary's campaign helped Obama win the upcoming real election. You don't get it at all.
Why are you jumping on an elected Democrat who is not in any way your rival, rather at this point the most famous of Obama endorsers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've been trying to ask people to talk to us all as a group
instead of one faction to another. I see it's not working. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. you've also been saying "I see why they respond to you like that" which might not be helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Hillary did that on Saturday ...
You are looking for someone to talk to your group? ... Hillary gave her speech and she asked that you all NOW work for Obama just like you worked for HER ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
53. No. I meant, trying to get us to talk to the whole forum as a group
instead of posts that are from one faction to another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. that's kinda ironic
since this thread seems to have not one, but two, Clinton supporters denying that Obama won, or denying that he won fairly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. They have different math...
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. You're Right...
Most Obama supporters know that you Hillary supporters consider olive branches to be toilet paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. And some of you Obama fans, and you in particular, will
be tombstoned on Wednesday at high noon, and then I can begin the celebration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That would be a blessing.
I would celebrate with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Why on earth would he be tombstoned? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. bwaaa. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. LOL - You've Been Far More Ignorant This Primary Season Than I Could Ever Dream Of...
I'd worry about your own tombstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Stop threatening people with tombstoning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. You're skating on thin ice as well hokies4ever...You seem
obsessed with me. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. Mommy, hold me!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #34
55. Who the hell are you to be threatening people?
I don't see an admin icon after your name, so you basically have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. How in the hell would you know who's on the verge of being tombstoned, and who isn't?

Are you compiling a little list of Obama supporters who make posts you don't like, and turning it in every day in the hopes that they'll get canned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #55
58. He's like the night watchman that acts like he works for the CIA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Hillary has asked you to work for OBAMA as hard as you worked for her
Did you listen to her on SATURDAY? ... If her speech meant so little to you then there is nothing we can say to you here ... you can choose to fight for the team or not ... she has asked for your support in getting behind the nominee ... OBAMA ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. I'm not a Clinton supporter.
Get a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
57. So true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. In some cases you might be right, onehandle
Onehandle, I'm a mature Obama supporter. I've always had problems with bothe Clintons and never liked or trusted them. But people do have different viewpoints on the issues. I may not like the Clintons but I sure won't be prejudiced against the many people who supported Hillary. Most of them are very intelligent and very nice, as are most Obama supporters.

It won't be helpful to the our mutual goals to continue 'fighting.' What we all want is Bush to be gone so the nation can heal and hopefully we'll all be doing better in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
31. Stop being a sore loser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. Who are you talking to? I was never a Clinton supporter.
Stop being a bitter winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Stop being a sore non-winner then
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
36. The primaries are over- stirring the crap is pointless- go for unity. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainman232 Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
48. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC