Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Question for Viet Nam vets re: Kerry filming himself

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mixxster Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 05:51 PM
Original message
Another Question for Viet Nam vets re: Kerry filming himself
She's at it again. Now it's, "Who had a camera with sound in Viet Nam"? I know I should just ignore her but this is a local forum, in a pretty conservative area, and I don't want her to continue to post this garbage without rebuttal. Although some of us have told her that vets did have movie cameras (although now she's changed it to cameras with sound), no one has spoken from experience.

If you have first hand knowledge and feel like stopping by to post your experiences, here is the addy:
http://talkback.lancasteronline.com/index.php?showtopic=11471&st=60&#entry52963

For those of you who are confused, see my original thread on this topic at: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=628246
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vets Took Pictures and made Movies
My step father used to take Polaroids of himself and the other guys in his platoon, and one of the guys did happen to have a movie camera.

I don't know if it had sound or not, my stepfather never said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think this would be a more interesting subject...
...there were a whole lot of cameras in Alabama when Bush "served" in the National Guard.

Here's Bush. The hot shot kid from a powerful political Texas family, and NO ONE ever takes a picture with this guy at the base?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mixxster Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Please Go There and Post This for Her
Eastman Kodak Super 8, 1965
Regular 8, or double 8, introduced in 1932, lasted nearly thirty years before serious consideration was given to improving it. The principal impetus for change came from those people who wanted to see the gauge become a bigger factor in the commercial, industrial and educational markets. For these markets, sound-on-film was a must, and the regular 8 format did not have enough room for an adequate sound stripe. Furthermore, many felt that the nuisance of having to stop after 25 feet, open the camera, and re-thread the film discouraged a lot of people from active use of the format.

So after several years of work and experimentation, in June 1965, Eastman
Kodak unveiled a brand new film format, faster film, a nifty new cartridge, and new cameras and projectors. First, the film perforations were much smaller, giving a nearly 50% bigger image area, and leaving room for a sound stripe and balance stripe, if desired. On top of that, the film cartridge slipped nicely into the camera, and told the camera exposure system what kind of film was inside!

http://www.oldfilm.org/nhfWeb/ed/essays/Kattelle_Film_Gauges.htm

She has been babbling that Super 8 cameras with sound weren't available in 1968. I don't want to take the time to create an account, since it doesn't look like a forum I would want to revisit. It's probably a waste of time, since it looks like she changes the topic frequently when she gets cornered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mixxster Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "It's probably a waste of time...
... since it looks like she changes the topic frequently when she gets cornered.

You nailed her M.O. in no time.

Thanks for the info.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. My father in WWII
came back with photos, they were stills (cause a movie camera at that time would've been impossible to take) but he has dozen and dozens of them awhole box full.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC