Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KerryEdwards: Cheney Argued for Kerry's Position on Troop Realignment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 11:01 PM
Original message
KerryEdwards: Cheney Argued for Kerry's Position on Troop Realignment
8/18/2004 6:07:00 PM
To: National Desk, Political Reporter

WASHINGTON, Aug. 18 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Following is a release of Kerry-Edwards 2004:

Despite the Bush campaign's outraged statements over Kerry's criticism of Bush's proposals on pulling back troops, it turns out that Dick Cheney himself held the exact same position, for the exact same reason.

CHENEY ON KOREAN FORCE SIZE: SAME POSITION AS KERRY

CHENEY SAID DANGER POSED BY NORTH KOREA REQUIRES U.S. PRESENCE. Cheney: "'In view of the dangers of nuclear proliferation in North Korea and the destabilizing impact on Northeast Asia -- and as a result of our consultations -- we have concluded that it would be unwise to proceed with major U.S. force reduction,' he said. 'We have therefore postponed the next round of force level adjustments being considered for Korea until the dangers and uncertainties of the North Korean nuclear program have been thoroughly addressed.'" (UPI, 11/21/91)

CHENEY SAID U.S. SHOULD NOT WITHDRAW FROM NORTH KOREA DUE TO NUCLEAR THREAT. "Cheney noted the decision announced this week in Seoul to suspend further troop cuts in South Korea because of North Korea's pursuit of nuclear weapons. He referred to Pyongyang's '40-year history of aggression, terrorism and irresponsible weapons sales' as adding to the concerns raised by its nuclear weapons program." (LAT, 11/23/91)

CHENEY: "In Korea, for example, we've been involved in 1991 and '92 -- involved in drawing down the size of our deployment there, shifting more of the burden to the Koreans, having them take more of a leadership role and we take more of a supporting role, and having them pick up a larger part of the economic burden. That process is underway, although we stopped any further reductions after the end of this year because of the uncertainty for now about the North, about how that's going to sort out." (Cheney remarks, 5/22/92)

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?ReleaseID=34898

http://www.usnewswire.com/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iwantmycountryback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Might be reaching
Considering he said those things over a decade ago. Of course nothing worse than the blatant lies of Cheney and Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not a reach at all - N. Korea is even more dangerous
and desparate than in 91. And now probably with the bomb!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. reaching
like running a misleading ad about Kerry's votes on intelligence bills in the '90s, or distorting his Vietnam record from 35 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. True. Time to trot out the "after 9/11" recording.
At least that's what I would expect to be the response to the response. Although, lest we forget, it's perfectly alright for Bush/Cheney to distort Kerry's record on cutting weapons programs which were in fact suggested by him while he was Poppy Bush's SOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC