Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Important- Swift Boat Veteran For Bush Files False Affidavit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:29 AM
Original message
Important- Swift Boat Veteran For Bush Files False Affidavit
Wasn't Monica Lewinsky's "false" affidavit the kernel from which Bill Clinton's impeachmemnt grew...


The link is too long... It's on the front page of the Washington Post....


Larry Thurlow SWORE in an AFFIDAVIT that Kerry was not under fire in the incident where he won his Bronze Star... It just so happens that Larry Thurlow won a Bronze Star and was under fire in the same incident...


I believe the affidavits were filed in the a Washington DC federal court....

Someone needs to research this incident and file a complaint...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who would have standing to file?
Don't you have to show harm? Seems like Rassman would have standing because Thurlow impugned his reputation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I'm Not An Attorney
Filing a false affidavit is a criminal offense... It's not a tort....


Anybody can demand an investigation. It doesn't have to be the person injured...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Ahh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's Late...
My premise isn't that Larry Thurlow needs to be impeached just indicted....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Not just indicted. Tried and Convicted. . . . nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Don't know about the affadavits but the 'FBI agent'
that supposedly 'researched' for this ad is crooked. I've read and heard in media reports of repeatedly mischaracterizing the interviews and putting false statements in the reports. The vets contacted have said they corrected their statements and sent them back. But there doesn't seem to be a followup on whether the corrections were actually made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. There's A Prima Facie Case That The Affidavit Is False...
He filed an affidavit he wasn't under fire...


The citation says he was under fire...


That's a prima facie case of a filing a false affidavit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Guy was A GOP Sheeple
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 02:45 AM by Erika
Prostituting the Vietnam war for his far right-wing idealogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. False affidavit. Book 'im Danno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. There's A Prima Facie Case That The Affidavit Is False...
We can't let this story die or we are a bunch of pussies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. See if this helps...
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 04:03 AM by fishface
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. No perjury: He didn't "file" the affidavit in any "official proceeding"
He's off the hook for any criminal perjury charges (although the civil implications of such a spectacular lie are uncertain). The Swiftboat Liars just bullied him into signing an affidavit, so he couldn't back out of his story.

The only people it was released to were the press/media.

Still, it was great work by Mike Dobbs at the WP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Then how would it be an 'affadavit'?
Seems to me that if it is an affadavit then it must have been filed somewhere, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I'm With You....
An affidavit has to be SWORN before a notary or an officer of the court under penalty of perjury...


I'm not an attorney but if I tell the press something that I know is untrue I'm just a liar but if I affirm something that is not true in an affidavit I am a perjurer...


I WANT AN INVESTIGATION INTO POSSIBLE CHARGES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Right...he lied before a Notary...but that's not a perjury offense
For perjury elements to be met the affidavit would have to be filed in an existing lawsuit, or in support of a criminal complaint.

The Swiftboat Liars have been careful to avoid any such official proceedings...they're just trying to sell books and get Bush elected. And their lies are against a public figure (JK) in an election campaign, which gives them another (First Amendment) layer of protection.

Nothing would suit me better than having Thurlow pay for his lies, but federal perjury charges will not apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. He Lied Before A Notary In An Affidavit Which Was Sworn Under The Penalty
Of Perjury....


How can it not be perjury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mumon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. the same reason Clinton's statements weren't perjury...
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 09:25 AM by Kanzeon
the "testimony" has to be materially relevant to the outcome of a particular civil or criminal complaint being litigated. That means that the outcome of the judicial proceeding would be different had the testimony not been false.

Now, if Swift Boat Liars get sued for slander or libel (say, by JK's comrades), then Mr. Thurlow will be rectally sodomized, metaphorically speaking, for these lies.

But until then, it's nothing at all.

This highlights some of the weirder aspects of these laws: they don't prevent someone from doing this at all. If JK's comrades don't have deep pockets to litigate (or friendly lawyers willing to put up money), they're screwed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Filing A False Affidavit And Making Pejurious Statements Are Different
Crimes and materiality is a question for the jury to decide. It can't be determined a priori....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. You are correct.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Please help me understand, what exactly is an affadavit?
Is it not somehow 'official'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. It's Official...
Filing a false affidavit is a crime...

An affidavit is a sworn statement before a notary or officer of the court under penalty of perjury...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Thanks , but now I have two opposing linkless assertions.
Still confused
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I Disagree.
Larry Thurlow evidently swore in an affidavit to a set of facts which appear to be false. If this affidavit was before a notary or officer of the court under penalty of perjury then he has legal exposure for perjury....

If there is a sworn statement that is untrue then a prima facie case of perjury exists...

The fact that it wasn't attached to an official proceeding is of no moment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
39. But he wasn't a party to any legal proceeding, DSB.
Perjury cannot exist in a vacuum.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. Pretty Good Evidence of Libel

Here you have an affidavit that under oath says one thing.

Then you have a report written contemporaneously with the event that says the opposite.

You have odd behavior by the guy (I lost my bronze star citation, I don't know what it says, I resisted giving access to my records as I feared they would be used against me).

Seems to me that the affidavit is evidence/proof that this guy is defaming or harming Kerry's reputation.

Teresa -- didn't you say you would use your money to bring an action against anyone who defamed or libeled your family?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. With this we should go on full scale attack. Discredit these bastards
and make them pay the price for lying, particularly that fat fuck John O'Neill who is still pissed off that Kerry was proven right in that debate in 1971.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
23. Does this offer any civil liability possibilities?
I'm anything but a legal wonk, but could the 527 that sponsored the ad be held accountable in civil court?

What better way to discredit the swiftboat lie backers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
24. Could this be another way for the media to drag the ad
back onto the air for free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. The Kerry People Are In A Bind...
Yeah - We want to see the provbial book thrown at these liars but even uncovering a false charge sometimes highlights it...


That's the downside of Kerry attacking the Swift Boat Liars too hard....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Exactly
I was a little sad to see they needed to deal with it at all. I'd hoped after the first week, the story was over. But the media kept bringing O'Neill back and hammering it, and now the Washington Times is going to put excerpts of their book all over the place. So I guess they felt they had to.

It's going to keep it in the media louder and longer now, but it had to be battled out. It's unfortunate.

I'd like somebody to ask the Chimp why he didn't take his flight physical now!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. KICK!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. Question: Does the freedom of information act allow the release of
all these liars' military records? Could, for example, the WaPo get O'Neill's records, or does he have to do something to release them?

Anybody know how it works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. I'm still hoping that a journalist would get James Bath's TANG records
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 09:54 AM by blm
and see how they match with Bush's records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
31. We knew WEEKS ago that Thurlow rec'd a medal for the same action
that he know says was a safe walk in the park. The research had already been done by the debunkers. What good is teh Post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I guess they had to see his after-action report first-hand
I think it's funny he's pretending he had no idea, and even claiming that Kerry somehow wrote *that* report, too!! HAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Has Thurlow actually commented on his report? Where? Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. In the WP article
"It's like a Hollywood presentation here, which wasn't the case," Thurlow said last night after being read the full text of his Bronze Star citation. "My personal feeling was always that I got the award for coming to the rescue of the boat that was mined. This casts doubt on anybody's awards. It is sickening and disgusting."

Thurlow said he would consider his award "fraudulent" if coming under enemy fire was the basis for it. "I am here to state that we weren't under fire," he said. He speculated that Kerry could have been the source of at least some of the language used in the citation.

In a telephone interview Tuesday evening after he attended a Swift Boat Veterans strategy session in an Arlington hotel, Thurlow said he lost his Bronze Star citation more than 20 years ago. He said he was unwilling to authorize release of his military records because he feared attempts by the Kerry campaign to discredit him and other anti-Kerry veterans.

The Post filed an independent request for the documents with the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, which is the central repository for veterans' records. The documents were faxed to The Post by officials at the records center yesterday.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13267-2004Aug18.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. Ashcroft Will Get Right On Top Of This
Just as soon as he finds out who outed Valerie Plame. Oh, wait, nevermind.



Sweet Jesus! Does this guy ever not look evil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
38. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our third quarter 2004 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC