Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: Why Did George W. Bush get a new TDL # in 1995?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:02 PM
Original message
Question: Why Did George W. Bush get a new TDL # in 1995?
The entire article from 1999, excerpted below, is very good stuff. The information regarding Bush being issued a new driver's license number in 1995 (while governor of Texas) is more than interesting. Especially, since, in Texas, a driver's license number is issued for life and cannot be changed. Even if a license is lapsed or suspended, the driver must keep the original number. At least John Q. Citizen must. Questions should be asked!


http://victorian.fortunecity.com/brambles/499/Bush/HowFar/howfar.html

The Starr Report, Oct. 28, 1999

How Far Is George W. Bush Willing To Go?
By Linda L. Starr

One day I realized George W. Bush always said he had nothing on his record to prevent him becoming president. Right away that told me he isn't denying guilt, just any record of his offenses. So, that made me want to use my investigative skills to find out what might be hidden from view. I expected any and every sort of thing possible ... even normal events, like a few parking tickets, or maybe a speeding ticket in his youth.

Guess what I found? Nothing...not a single thing! It didn't seem possible considering things the family had admitted in public forums. Then while digging around in the Texas Department of Public Safety records, I found something really odd. Could it be a clerical error?

Yet right before my eyes was something no one seemed to have noticed before ... that Governor George W. Bush had obtained a new Texas driver's license number. That was very unusual and such a strange number, too: 00000005! Then I ran into some brick walls when I started asking questions. That seemed odd to me since in several public forums he or his family has admitted to some run-ins with the law. He had been questioned about the stealing of a Christmas wreath, but let off the hook. No record. He had one or two other minor scrapes with the law. No record. He had paid a fine of $130 on Sept 2, 1994, for killing a protected species bird while hunting – that was right before being elected governor in November of 1994. And now along with his old number went the record of his paying that fine. So that proves that sometime between Sept 2, 1994, and March 31, 1995 George W. Bush obtained this new driver's license number of 00000005, because all infractions of the law are listed on your Texas Driver's License Detail.

.....

So, again I ask, what plans might the Bush camp have in store for me and others like me who openly criticize his mentality, education, ethics, morals, and hypocrisy in governing? What method might they use to kill this messenger as they have done to J. H. Hatfield? Maybe they fear what they do not want known even more widely than now...that George W. got a new driver's license number and no amount of attacks on me will change that fact. I do not use rumors, or innuendos, or terrified unnamed sources to accuse him. I stand here with my proof from the DPS records that he did get a new drivers license number. Why was that necessary?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deferred adjudication for cocaine possession.
That's why he did community service in the ghetto of Houston.

He got that preferred treatment for a hard drug when people were going to the state pen for marijuana SEEDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. He DUI arrest wasn't known then was it?
It could have been to hide that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. His "known" DUI arrest was in Maine, not Texas.
Rumors of W's profligate behavior have abounded for years. There's a question regarding whether Bush was in rehab in Alabama, not working on a senatorial campaign, when he was supposed to be fulfilling his National Guard service there. The people at the Blount campaign remember that he was rarely ever around. And we know that nobody ever saw him at the Air Force base. So what WAS he doing in Alabama?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-04 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Was he driving on a TX license in Maine when he got his DUI ??
And would they not have taken his license, no matter what state he was driving in? How was the DUI adjudicated in Maine ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. I haven't seen this piece for a while.
It didn't fly very far when originally published because it's purely speculative (even though I share the speculations), so...pardon me for asking...why bring it up now? Unless you or someone has new information on what was concealed by the DL# change, of course. Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think the Corporate Media decided he was going to be President
and covered up any questions about his unsavory past. A lot was swept under the rug. Laura got a new number, too. Probably to cover up the negligent homicide in her past, although that was too well-known in Midland to stay a secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-04 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. it isn't speculation...
...that Bush and James Bath both received new TDL, a highly unusual happening. It isn't speculation that Bush and Bath were both grounded from the TANG at the same time. It isn't speculation that Bath has a long association as financier and broker for Middle Eastern families such as the bin Ladens, and that Bath was the go-between for ME financing of Bush's oil company Arbusto.

The story, incidentally, was originally broken in Online Journal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, those bare facts are not speculation--
nor are they totally damning in themselves. It's the speculations that arise from them that are truly interesting, but those speculations are still speculations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gee, I dunno, maybe....................
to hide something unsavory like a felony drug conviction or other felony that would have prohibited him from going any farther in politics? Nah, I'm SURE I'm just being paranoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. whatever comes out, he holds the baby Jesus trump card
He repented and was "born again" and that made him a new and pure man--

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC