Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'd just like to thank Obama for voting against Telecom immunity today.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:38 PM
Original message
I'd just like to thank Obama for voting against Telecom immunity today.
It's a pity the Dodd Amendment, which Obama strongly and vociferously supported, did not pass. I wish more people had fought for it; maybe if we had applied some pressure we could have gotten enough Senators to vote the right way on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. True, but he should have stood his ground
I am still very disappointed with his final vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He did. He also held his position that we need to pass a bill returning FISA oversight.
He voted exactly as he said he would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. If Obama had voted No, the Rethug 527 ads would already be up!
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 04:44 PM by flpoljunkie
Obama will not keep you safe!

There is a reason why McCain harps on terrorism. It's the only thing he polls better than Obama does--by a whopping 20 points--53-33!

Very sadly, the American voters are, as a whole, woefully uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Who cares what the 527s say? He should have voted "No" anyway
The Repukes will try to tear Obama a new one no matter what he does. They know that their own candidate sucks, so all they can do now is attack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. We need to win in Nov. more than anything, FISA is an issue they have framed incorrectly for low
info voters for months if not years. We cannot expect an informed electorate. We have to win POTUS & a big majority in the Senate. Barring those 2 occurrences we will be screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. So, politics as usual, fuck change........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. If you mean losing then no not politics as usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #37
53. With the FISA vote, we may lose either way
So tell me, what have we accomplished by caving in to Herr Decider AGAIN?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Do you actually think the vast majority of voters even know about FISA? If so have they bought the
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 05:22 PM by rosebud57
GOP framing or are they too smart for that?


Losing elections does no one any good at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. So? Principles mean nothing?
We let the republicans decide how democratic senators vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NattPang Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. The only thing that will get back your constitutional rights
is to win the election.

That should be your principle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Spin much?
Quote from kirby on another topic


Here are the Dems who voted FOR FISA! SHAME ON THEM!!!!

Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Conrad (D-ND)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lincoln (D-AR)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)

and 'Independent Democrat'

Lieberman (ID-CT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Nope. I think we need to recognize the good votes that our candidates make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. He voted for an amendment then broke and voted for the bill.
That is 100 percent flip flop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. That kind of dumbass non-thinking reminds me of Zell Miller claiming that
John Kerry wanted our troops to fight with spitballs because he voted against a military spending bill containing funding for M-16s. Bills are voted on not based on the value of one amendment or one section, but on the whole. Obama voted against immunity. He voted for a flawed comprehensive bill that also included immunity, among other good things, such as restoring oversight to FISA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Turn down the RPMs on the Spin Machine.
Only the repubs can spin that fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. "Spin" apparently now means "Huh, that's a damn good point. I can't think of a good response yet."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. And, whaddya know, turns out he was a troll. Gotta love pizza.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 04:42 PM by The_Casual_Observer
How much are they paying you to do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. I guess I am one of the few who isn't disappointed
I expected it to go this way. It's a drag but I think they were convinced the telecoms thought they were doing the right thing.

No I don't agree but I decided a week or so ago it was a done deal and we had lost the battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. same here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
40. In my opinion, the only thing that convinced them was all the PAC money
and lobbying money thrown their way.

Last year the telecoms spent 35.6 million dollars lobbying congress to protect them. Obama himself recieved 285,000 dollars from Time Warner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
47. Going along to get along is so much less stressful
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 11:23 PM by aquart
Than protesting a wrong until the last bloody gasp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, now in the debates he can say "I voted against it, before I voted for it."
That worked so well once before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Actually in the debates he can say "I've been entirely consistent in my positions"
because it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. So you believe that candidates should never vote for compromise bills if their amendments fail?
That kind of hardcore partisan purism would be the exact opposite of what Obama ran on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. What compromise? He folded like a house of cards. Fillibuster??
He should have voted against it. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. He stayed consistent. He said he was for returning FISA oversight. He said he was against
telecom immunity. His votes today were consistent with those statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. No, he voted for several amendments
And then decided that the final bill was imperfect but better than nothing. I disagree, but that's not the same as "I voted for it, before I voted against it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
46. It is "I voted against it, before I voted for it." It, being immunity.
I don't care if the dogshit is bare or has bacon, lettuce and tomato wrapped around it....IT IS STILL DOGSHIT! The fact stands, he voted for immunity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. We need to remind people he supported the Dodd Amendment.
Certain folk here will keep harping on the idea that "there's no difference between Obama and McCain", and we need to push back with Obama's support of the Dodd Amendment, and his promise to fight immunity once in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Right, he's keeping his powder dry. Where have we heard that before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. No, he isn't. He strongly supported a good amendment. He will continue to fight for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. It's such a good amendment, George Bush was for it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #43
50. Link? The entire Republican caucus voted against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
42. you know why we're keeping our powder dry? We don't intend to use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. He should have voted against it,
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 04:44 PM by judy
as long as it did not include the Dodd amendment.
I am quite disappointed.
On Edit:
He should have voted against it PERIOD!!

But I would like once more to make clear that I think Obama is not the person I hoped he would be YET: I will vote for him, and I still donate to his campaign.(though right now all my $$ is going into my gas tank)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Thanks for saying that, Judy. About supporting and donating, I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Yes, Jennifer, no problem...
However, as I have said in many posts, my fear is that in his latest incarnation, Obama might be jeopardizing his chances of winning the election.
His great strength was that he was different from other politicians, and that's what I think got him the nomination..
His attitude lately has been so just like every other middle of the road democrat, that I am getting worried. I don't subscribe to the "move to the right to get their vote" strategy. I don't think it has ever worked, yet it is recognized as a good strategy. Why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. I like you Occam, but this is kind of weak n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. What's weak is people completely ignoring the fact that Obama is strongly opposed to teleco immunity
and are not even taking the slightest notice of the fact that the best chance we had of stripping telecom immunity fell ignored by the wayside despite his attempts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. Obama voted for the final Bill Passing...only 28 Senators voted against it....
:shrug: Your post is misleading. He voted for Amendments but didn't stand his ground against the very bill he promised early on in the Campaign to "Fillibuster" against. :shrug: Sorry ...but that's what it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. what is weak is
people finding ways to be less than 100% supportive of the best candidate running
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. I thank him, too. He did exactly as he said he would. He kept
his promise.

We now have 17 dems to voice our displeasure with about their vote to KEEP the immunity provision. I suggest that folks here start doing just that.

I called my DINO senator, Ken Salazar, before the vote but it did no good. He voted against the Dodd amendment anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. I don't know why Salazar just doesn't get it over with and change his party affiliation.
He is truly the epitome of a DINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. The best orator of our time and leader of our party sat on the bench for this one
With all that firepower, all he did was cast a vote on a sure-loser.

I count this one as a loss for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. He was out there fighting. Don't blame him because the rest of the party didn't take the field.
After all, just as we said--he's a first-term junior Senator. Until elected, he doesn't have the Senate clout to boss the chamber around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. "He was out there fighting."
Can you link to that particular article? I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
35. Did anyone honestly think the Dodd Amendment had any chance at all of passing?
It was a foregone conclusion that the amendment was a non-starter...it was foregone last week when cloture was invoked.

Don't be naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #35
51. So we should ignore a vote if one or two YEAs wouldn't have made a difference?
I suppose then that we'll be ignoring the FISA bill here, since that, too, was a foregone conclusion with a blowout vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
38. Everytime I read one of your OP's, I'm reminded why you're one of the best posters here. K & R.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberacci Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
48. I have no comments
I know too little about FISA to be talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
49. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
52. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
54. And for his last act, I'd just like to thank him for voting for cloture along with 100 % of the R's
Now that's emphatic opposition to a bad bill. Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC