Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brent Budowsky: McCain Doesn't Need a Fact-Checker; the Media Edit His Mistakes for Him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 06:47 AM
Original message
Brent Budowsky: McCain Doesn't Need a Fact-Checker; the Media Edit His Mistakes for Him
http://www.alternet.org/election08/92570/mccain_doesn%27t_need_a_fact-checker%3B_the_media_edit_his_mistakes_for_him/

McCain Doesn't Need a Fact-Checker; the Media Edit His Mistakes for Him

By Brent Budowsky, Consortium News. Posted July 25, 2008.

The media cover up McCain's latest egregious misstatements on Iraq.



John McCain, presumably advised by Karl Rove and definitely imitating the politics of George Bush, is now saying that Barack Obama would rather lose a war than lose an election.

This is a defamation; this is a slander; this is a lie. McCain should apologize to Obama.

This is the latest in a long list of cheap-shot, low-blow politics. McCain has learned nothing about why the American people are rejecting the Republicans and why the Republican brand has been compared to the appeal of defective dog food.

snip//

For now, two points:

First, McCain repeatedly lowers the quality of discourse in American politics. The man who ran in 2000 has disappeared; the face of Bush 44 has taken his place with these Rove-like low blows. It is McCain who has always been the fair-haired boy of the press.

Second, John McCain has made a long series of substantial factual errors that will become a major issue. Whether the problem is age or sloppiness, partisanship or tiredness, on issue after issue McCain says things that are factually incorrect.

Couric protected McCain by editing out his latest and very substantial factual error, gaffe, falsehood or mistake (call it what you will).

Scarborough works to protect McCain by demeaning Olbermann, the messenger, who should be praised for doing real reporting (heaven forbid).

McCain's Rove-like attacks -- and his serious and repeated factual errors on major issues -- should be major topics in the election and staying silent about them does our political discourse no good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Katie Couric has no journalistic standards.
If it feels good do it seems to be her motto. She should be fired for her unethical manipulation of the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if McCain is so used to not being questioned, he feels he can say anything with impugnity.
The media seems truly to be 'his base' as McCain once said.

McCain's ignorance of foreign policy 'facts,' i.e., the difference between Sunni and Shia is really quite astounding for someone who is touted by the media as having unquestioned foreign policy credentials.

We appear to be in the realm of the "emperor with no clothes' here with McCain and the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Then consider the ads McCain has put out moaning about all the
media love Obama is getting. Who exactly is getting preferential treatment? The McCain camp isn't good at much, but seem practiced at clouding issues. If he should win because of this 'skill', we're doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. McCain is the "unexamined candidate' here. The media is, once again, not doing it's job.
It's deja vu all over again--remember how they failed to examine George W. Bush's record--even with Molly Ivin's urging "just look at his record in Texas!" But, as we all know, they did not, and we have been paying for their journalistic malpractice ever since!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. the Free Ride has its perks -- you have to earn your seat for access
just ask Kelly O'Donald
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC