Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At the Dem Convention, the vets stood there for Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 06:52 PM
Original message
At the Dem Convention, the vets stood there for Kerry
Do the swift boat liars really have the 250 they claim or are they lying. How many swift boat vets are there total?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Many of them signed because of Kerry's antiwar activities
Remember, Kerry's winning the nomination by draping himself in his war record to separate himself from the Deans of the race was a pretty radical departure for him because he didn't make a point of flaunting his credentials since Vietnam, until now. So doing so made a lot of veterans pissed because, well, they're Republican largely anyway, in a case like this, and because they saw what Kerry did as wrong, even if they're not Republicans.

A lot of them had no idea of what they were really signing up to though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Many of them were encouraged to sign affidavits that were twisted around
A new vet who hadn't previously stepped forward to complain about the Swiftliars, was on the news tonight (ABC I think) complaining that someone had come to his house and interviewed him about wartime events with Kerry but then wrote up an affidavit containing incorrect information (such as that they were not under enemy fire)

This man backed up Kerry saying that they WERE under enemy fire. He said he realized that the affidavit contained erroneous statements and declined to sign it. I would bet that lots of them did not carefully read the affidavits they signed, or were talked into it for political reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC