|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:46 PM Original message |
I don't think Kerry should fight it if Nader wants to be in the debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brainshrub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. Should definately include him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. Can I Be In The Debates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. I do! Each viable candidate needs as much time and exposure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WMliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. how about the green party candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Good point, I am not sure what the criterion should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WMliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. i agree about gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. Gore had nothing to do with excluding Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikehiggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. THis is a joke, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. No, Nader is not helping. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Just curious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. how does Nader hurt bush more than Kerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
8. um, no, Nader should NOT be in the debates b/c he's funded by Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 10:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
30. That's right, the republicans only get one candidate in the debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastknowngood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
9. He should refuse to be on the same stage with the ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaTeacher (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. He is on the left--so he would take more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Is that the criteria? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaTeacher (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Perot's lawyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 10:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. no, he has to be polling 15 percent in the polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 10:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Thankfully, he is nowhere near 15 %. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. Allowing Nader in the debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Sad but true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. oops posted twice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. your repeating yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
18. Third Party candidates are usually ignored in the debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Nader is very angry with democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
21. I'm sure Bush would love to open it up to anyone who's interested. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
22. I thought they should have included that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. Nader isn't in them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
25. WRONG!! Visibility=credibility=several more percent=DISASTER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 10:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
37. Not a great endorsement of Kerry there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 11:00 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Nothing to do with the debates themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
26. yes, let's prevent a real airing of the issues that define the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 09:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 10:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. the debate criteria is quite reasonable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 10:07 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Uninformed electorate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 10:43 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. touche.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
35. Nader won't have the necessary poll standing to be included. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
39. Not if he's not on enough ballots to have even a theoretical chance to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
40. FUCK NADER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
41. Nader is working for Bush - you want two right wingers vs. Kerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_Bonanza (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-24-04 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
42. Cobb should be allowed before Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-24-04 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
43. The debates are about picking a winner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smb (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-24-04 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
44. Simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-24-04 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
45. agree, I think this was one of gores mistakes too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC