Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there going to be any progressive representation at the convention?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:48 AM
Original message
Is there going to be any progressive representation at the convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. IBTL!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does Dennis get to speak?
At all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I am really really hoping he does.
there was a post here on what the lineup was and didn't see him name. :(
but it could have been incomplete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. not if this is the full list, but do they have speakers all day long? did DK speak in 2004?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I'm the wrong person to ask, sorry.
Know almost nothing about how conventions work or whether they are an all day into evening thing, etc.

hopefully someone can fill the basics in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yes.
He addressed the convention on day 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
29. Far from being a complete lineup. and yes DK spoke at the Convention,
as did every single person who ran during the primary (including Sharpton), the two former president, the previous nominee, and an host of people who matter more or less.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
53. Jesse Jackson Sr. blew his chance to speak. I think that decision was wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. ME TOO- IBTL!!!!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. .
AT the convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Since I'm not going (but was a delegate on the state level)
Edited on Mon Aug-18-08 01:00 AM by mmonk
I've haven't paid much attention to the lineups. Sounds from what I'm hearing to be pretty much a rightward lean. Some of us would like to know if progressives that bust their asses for this party get a voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does Lee Mercer Jr count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. All three
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah...
until they lock them all up in the parking garage they've turned into a concentration camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. No, those cages are for kitties that have been drugged by big pharma and brainwashed by the CIA
nothing progressive about the pharma-funded kitty cult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. You can probably rule out Tuesday
That seems to be DLC suckfest day, for the most part. I'll probably turn that shit off, if all they do is recycle the same failed "Third Way" horseshit talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. If it's "failed," why do you support Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Because the other alternative, McCain, is unacceptable.
However as time has gone on, and the two parties continue their approach to each other, it becomes increasingly difficult to differentiate between the two. It also becomes difficult to really support any branch of the two party/same corporate master system of government.

What I would love to see is corporate money taken out of our elections via publicly financed election campaigns. I imagine if that happened you would see the party and this country take a sudden move to the left.

But with things the way they are, way too many disillusioned and disenchanted people are left with the conundrum of once again voting for the lesser of two evils. I would like, for one of the few times in my life, actually feel like voting for a Democratic candidate rather than merely voting against the 'Pug candidate.

It isn't a matter that we "support" Obama. It is simply a matter that we have little other choice than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. So by your own admission now it isn't failed because you DO support it and...
Edited on Mon Aug-18-08 06:46 AM by wyldwolf
Obama's better than McCain and there are very few differences between the two major parties.

Thanks for going on the record, Mr. Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. sounds like a nuanced quote from Nader himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
40. Umm Mr. Nader believes there aren't enough differences to support the Democratic Party
That's a completely different stance than those who say that while there are fewer differences than they would like, they still support the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Obama's The Only Realistic Alternative to McBush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. there are many other candidates that would have a shot if...
.. the great and incredibly organized netroots nation would get behind them... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
39. And then you'll miss the good bits!
Watch it first. And then declare you have turned it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. Sure, just follow the smell of the CS gas outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. Come to Progressive Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Why? No One's Pining For Florida 2000, Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. still whining about 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
22. Are you serious? Security people will probably be given lists of known
"progressives" so they can be kept away from the convention entirely. The whole convention process is nothing more than a four-day-long orgy of backroom dealing and influence buying/selling. That goes for the Democratic convention as well as the Republican—and anyone who says otherwise is full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Thanks, But
No one wants to re-live 2000. I will never vote third party for President again, unless the third party candidate is truly viable. Otherwise, I'm only helping the Pub win. Thanks a lot, but no thanks. And, by the time a third party candidate is viable, the third party is probably very much like the two major parties. Work from within. Challenge incumbents who are not doing the job, etc. But please do not add to apathy on the part of Dems or take votes away from Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
46. Umm, the backroom dealing is done long before the convention
It's a four day nationally televised event where Senator Obama will be introduced to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
28. Uh, Obama is a progressive/liberal.
So I assume by "progressive" you mean the "I'm voting for Nader if Kucinich isn't nominated" types that fucked us over in 2000... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Obama is not progressive
Sorry. He's not. He's just the best we've got, he's not McCain, but he's a far cry from Progressive. He's a religionist who opposes equality for some minorities based on his dogma...that is simply not Progressive.
He voted to make the Patriot Act permanant, he funded the war, he voted for wire tapping Americans.

What are the specifics you use to bolster your claim that Obama is a Progressive? Make your case. He's our nominee, he's all we have to vote for, but he is far from liberal or progressive. He's a 'centerist' which means he picks a position after those with real opinions have picked theirs, and tries to work both sides. Triangulation it is called.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. You just proved my point.
What gives you the right to define "liberal" and "progressive" to only mean Kucinich-ite ideological purists? And he had good reasons for those votes AFAIK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. I Love These Fuzzy Label Questions That Have No Relevance Whatsoever
What is more leftist? Mao or Che?

Who was smater? Aristotle or Plato?

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Che.
Plato.
Angels don't dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #47
58. I will give you Che.

But Aristotle was much brighter than Plato.

And while Baptist angels might not dance, Roman Catholic angels do. As do Jewish angels, just not with women.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
50. Bluenorthwest nails it! Saaa-WISH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. I'm an Obama delegate, but he has some unprogressive
tendencies. I'm not looking for control, just a voice and acknowledgment we are part of the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
30. Very reasonable question. At this point, a few progressive are listed,
(like Tammy Baldwin), but the big roaster of speakers are moderate to very moderate. From the names announced, Biden and Hillary Clinton come out as some of the most progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yes. His Name Is Barack Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
33. The Greens will have their own convention.
Nader will have some press conference or something.

Bill Clinton, a "progressive", will speak at the convention. Maybe Al Gore too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. I'm not sure what you mean.
The Progressive Democrats of America is not a small group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #36
52. I guess that every speaker will be progressive then
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specterderrida Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. The Greeens already had their convention. Nadar not runnning with the
Greens. Cynthia McKinney is their nominee.

But, yes. Bill, the progressive will speak and another progressive also-Hillary will speak:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #33
55. You consider Bill Clinton a Progressive?
He gave us DOMA and DADT just for starters, plus he's DLC. He's is far more conservative than he is progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. but his wife claims to be a progressive. If the dems are progressive
then everyone speaking at the convention will be progressive.

imho, corportism will be alive at both conventions:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. Define progressive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Someone who doesn't bend over backwards trying to please
Edited on Mon Aug-18-08 09:34 AM by mmonk
the right that their eyes come face to face with their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
38. The union workers who clean the place up afterwards. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
41. That's kind of a broad question
And the answer probably depends how you define progressive. I happen to consider our nominee progressive, so in my book, yes there will be. For those who think Obama is not progressive enough, maybe not. It probably also depends on what issue(s) you are using as a litmus test for someone's progressive credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Depends on what one means by litmus test since I didn't mention one.
Edited on Mon Aug-18-08 06:07 PM by mmonk
Though politicians are tring to cloud or redefine progressive, it shouldn't be hard to identify. For example, most of the names I've heard mentioned aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
43. To define "Progressive" one must look at the issues:
Some Progressive Positions:

*Universal Single Payer healthCare (NOT mandatory Health Insurance)

*Publicly Financed Elections

*Strengthening Social Safety Nets

*Decreasing Military Spending

*Ending the "Free Trade" Scams

*Reregulation of Energy, Banking, Transportation, and Communication

*Effective Ethics oversight of ALL elected officials (conflict of interest/lobbying)

*Absolute protection of Constitutional and Civil Rights

*Universal FREE Public Education through graduate school

*Re-instituting Anti-Trust and Fair Competition legislation to allow independents (Mom & Pop) to compete with Big Box on an even playing field.

*REAL Support for small independent business/family farm, not lip service

*Strengthening of Consumer Protection/Environmental Protection Class Action lawsuits.

*Absolute protection of LABOR and ENVIRONMENT.

*Absolute protection of Social Security/MediCare

*Returning the Progressive Income Tax system to John Kennedy levels


By those standards, neither Obama nor the Clintons can be considered "Progressive" or "Liberal"

Where do you stand on those issues?


Where do you think the majority of Americans stand on those issues?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. One can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems to Win Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
49. Norman Solomon is an Obama delegate (California district 6) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
54. Fox News, the sole provider of coverage, will probably have
lots of shots of Al Sharpton, jesse Jackson, other "scary" liberals.

I can't believe Wes Clark won't be speaking. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
57. Yes, he and she will be by the Coke machine, helping with the table setup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC