Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the sudden outburst of support for Hillary because she will take McCain to the mattresses?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:34 PM
Original message
Is the sudden outburst of support for Hillary because she will take McCain to the mattresses?
Something that so far has not happened by the Obama team. I for one will admit that I like Hillary for VP (and did not at all before the primaries ended) because she can fend off the swiftboating and she would hand McCain his ass. Someone has to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. ::pokes out mind's eye::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. Lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
71. rather Hill take McRove to the mattress than to watch Bayh try - awkward
Edited on Thu Aug-21-08 02:54 PM by Supersedeas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerConservative Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. thanks for that visual image... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. I can tell you've never seen nor read "The Godfather"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerConservative Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. I was just being silly...
You know what they say about assumptions :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. They make an ass out of FormerConservative???
JOKING -- for real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerConservative Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:06 PM
Original message
I knew I'd get around to using the ignore button, eventually...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
54. I was just being silly, yoo -- good grief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. ...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. A couple more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. Good comeback - Kudos!!! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
49. Bill Clinton singing the accolades of McCain on McCain's website
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #49
65. Obama Backs Law Helping McCain
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/02/29/obama_backs_law_to_ensure_mcca.html

By Shailagh Murray
FORT WORTH -- Sen. Barack Obama's campaign announced he would co-sponsor legislation introduced yesterday by his political ally Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) to ensure that John McCain can become president, even though he was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

The issue of McCain's eligibility was raised in a New York Times article noting the constitutional requirement that a U.S. president be a "natural-born citizen" had never been fully defined.

The McCaskill bill, submitted immediately after she scrawled it onto a notepad on the Senate floor in response to the Times story, would establish the eligibility of anyone born to a U.S. citizen who is serving overseas as an active or reserve member of the U.S. armed forces. The Arizona senator's father was a Navy officer serving in the Canal Zone when McCain was born there in 1936.

"Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party's nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign," Obama said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
64. And look how far that
is getting us so far, according to about half of DU who have been panicing for the past couple days. Do we need another Obama, or does he want an attack dog for vp, as I keep hearing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
72. ROFL! I hear heads exploding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
87. Ooops.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
94. Good One!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
101. yep, those pics sure look like mattress time. ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. As I recall, she thinks McCain is swell - and "Obama has a speech."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think anyone wants to "take McCain to the matresses".
Even Cindy. Ewww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Historical Reference
Edited on Thu Aug-21-08 01:40 PM by ericgtr
Not that people won't get the "matresses" reference but just in case we have the great Don Corleone to thank for it. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. I'm shocked by how many DON'T get the reference!
Take the cannoli and leave the gun, ericgtr...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
52. Sorry, I didn't like the Godfather films.
I know, I'm the only one. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. There are a few more I know
You all just need to eat some more cannoli.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
60. I got it and infact threw up a little at the thought
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
81. I got the reference. YOU didn't understand it.
"Going to the matresses" was when one gathered his most trusted family members and friends together and went to a secret hideout.

Do you consider McCain to be one of Hillary's most trusted friends?
Do you think Hillary and McCain need to "hide out" together?
That would explain why she was campaigning for him during the Primaries.

I think what you meant to say was that Hillary would take McCain "to the mat", which is a wrestling term for taking down your opponent.

No Charge.

BTW:
When has Hillary ever "brought down" a Republican?
What single issue has she "fought for" against strong Republican opposition since she has been in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama will be fine without her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just a question here...
How many right wing political experts have you heard "candidly" comment that the only way Obama can win is by adding Her Royal Highness to the ticket? Lets see... that would be ALL of them.


Keep your powder dry, November is a long way off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Since when do we take advice from that pack of mouth-breathers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Agreed the whole Obama campaign has been soft
somebody has to get down and fight. If Obama, for whatever reason, can't do it he needs a VP who can, Hillary would do and maybe Gen. Clark. Unfortunately I'm afraid he's going to choose another milquetoast and we're going to be screwed come Nov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
10 Year Freeper Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
74. Traditional Role
The traditional role of the VP is to be the attack dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't know...
I don't think I have heard her attack McCain very hard in the past. I'm sure she would if she was the VP but she actually seems to respect McCain so it might not be as natural as when she was attacking Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. She'll hand him his ass? Maybe after she and Bill stop kissing it. Maybe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lewiskw Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
53. Wow
Get over the past aren't you the one who always said move on past the primaries why dont you take your own advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #53
79. No, you're probably thinking of someone else, and
Two days ago, Bill Clinton felt the need to give McCain a pat on the head since he couldn't just lend some unqualified support to Obama: "But John McCain has the best record of any Republican running for president on the energy issue and on climate change."

Tell Bill it's time to start supporting the Democrats wholeheartedly against McCain instead of giving voters the impression that it's practically a fucking tossup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lewiskw Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #79
96. Can You read
He said McCain has best record of any Republican not candidate wasn't any diss towards Obama looks like you needs some glasses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, hell, she was practically sleeping with him during the primary.
If you want to bring up mattresses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Seems kinda hard to attack him now, after loving him before. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. No, it's because of an organized last minute desperate push by the pharma funded kitty cult.
They actually are harassing superdelegates (and maybe even pledged delegates) trying to get them to change their votes. It's not going to happen, but some are taking advantage of that hysteria and claiming that Hillary is entitled to the VP slot because she "almost won".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't like the imagery you put in my head just now.
Although, to be fair, I would probably leave Cindy for Hillary even if she hadn't broken her hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Seems to trace back to this...
Within the last week the pudits (YES THAT'S MSM)have started pounding the "he just might have to swallow and take her--she will save him". And everybody jumped on board, as they hoped. If they want it so bad then you know it's the one they think they can use to put the nail in Obama's coffin. I'll guarantee you if he picks her all we will hear from this convention to election day is "Bill, Bill, Bill...ummm and that kid". This is a no win situation. Most likely either way we lose unless Obama can really nail McCain on something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. Some posters raelly need to raed "The Godfather"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Are you saying Obama needs a "war consigliari?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Yes, I think he does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. The poster isn't using the reference correctly.
In The Godfather, "going to the mattresses" means going to war. Or more literally, you stock up your house or compound with mattresses so that your soldiers can all stay together and stay vigilant until it's over.

So, we (Democrats) want to go the mattresses. We don't want to take McCain to the mattresses.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. True, but the sentiment is there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerConservative Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. Oh my goodness...are you feeling ok? Take it easy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Take the cannoli and leave the gun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
66. Exactly.
It is as if the poster said that she will sleep with fishes with McCain.

Use a reference right or don't do it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. And some need to stop pretending Clintons are asskickers when they're really GOP assKISSERS.
How many of you have forgotten Bill Clinton's summer 2004 DEFENSE OF BUSH booktour?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. She is seen as a necessary evil.
If Obama was up 30% everywhere, why bother with the drama involved.

But since it is kind of close, she provides the biggest bang in terms of party unity, fresh perspective in comprehension of national campaigns, rust belt appeal, economic brand-name, capacity for amoral political discipline, efficacy on the attack, etc.

Joe Scarborough once said of the Chimperor, "Bush doesn't fight well going backward." I think that's astute. Bush is a surprisingly good politician (for a chimpanzee) when he has the initiative, but adversity breaks his stride.

Obama also doesn't fight well going backward. He sets a plan and executes.

The Clintons do not fight well going forward. They are counter punchers who thrive on responding to a shifting environment. That's why there's always drama... they know they can handle the drama better than the other guy.

Different people have different skills. Hillary's skills would be of some use to the Obama campaign right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Very interesting post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
76. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #76
102. pizza given here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
91. spot on.
and I think you just described my wife and I, as well. I plan & she executes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. She's been very reluctant to attack McCain.... in fact, it's been the opposite....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. The Obama campaign has not asked her to attack McCain
If you have some Obama campaign memos to share that suggest otherwise, please do.

But in general surrogates go where they're asked to go and fulfill a role they're asked to fulfill.

Hillary is playing ball. Bill not so much, but if Hillary isn't attacking McCain it's because Obama doesn't want her to.

And I don't necessarily disagree. Since he would barely make the news if she was fighting with McCain it would mess with whatever he's trying to execute going into the conventions.

Until her role is clarified in the public mind through the convention pageantry she shouldn't be making controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Yeah, and Bill used his 3wk booktour in 2004 to support and defend Bush because Kerry asked him to.
We already laughed at that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. Sorry, I must have missed the announcment of the big DU non sequitur contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. It follows if you're honest enough about what and when the Clintons will do for a Dem nominee.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Since the topic is Hillary as VP, the question is what Hillary would do for Hillary
Edited on Thu Aug-21-08 02:34 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Hillary would fight like a wildcat to be the first female VP if given the chance.

There would be no upside to her in losing because winning puts her in line for 2016. (Losing puts her in line for being blamed for losing)

Almost all politicians, Hillary and Obama included, are total narcissists, and their behavior is thus easy to deduce.

(That's why this is moot point... Only egomaniacs run for president. Obama not going to share the spotlight, so the VP will probably be Kaine or Sebelius, and most certainly not Hillary.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. She didn't attack McCain back in April and May... in fact, she praised him...


If you think she'd attack McCain you're projecting something onto her that she's not capable of.


McCain's her friend. She'll no more attack him than Daschle will attack him. Their friends.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. "If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog"
Politicians attack who they are running against.

She is a politician.

She will attack whoever stands between her and what she wants.

If she was on the ticket she would want to win because 1) she doesn't like to lose anything, and 2) being a losing VP candidate is a terrible way to ever get to be president.

QE-motherfucking-D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
77. Your argument is compelling.
1 and 2 speak to me.

Can you show me her doing this. Even a little? Or even just saying that she is willing to set aside that (politicial) friendship and lay down the smack? I want to believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. She campaigned for Obama in Illinois, didn't she?
I imagine they were probably perfectly friendly until people started talking about him running for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #82
86. Did they
go on any fact finding trips together? Spend any real time together?

When she campaigned, she was the superstar, helping out. I assume, at least. Having been in similar situations, its not the same as a drinking buddy.

I just question how effective she can let herself be against McCain. I haven't seen even a trace of her attack abilitys against him. Even when she was running under the general assumption that she would be running against him.

Perhaps I am misremembering, but I recall some event where one of them said that if they were running opposite, it would be the most civil campaign ever. What changes if she is VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
70. Ummm
Now Obama has to ask democrats to hold republicans accountable?

There was a time when she was running for the nomination. Months of it in fact. At that time, a person taking the republican nominee down would have had a shot at getting my vote. Hillary did not do so. Please show me where she did, and I will change my tune. I want to be wrong, since I see her as a serious potential choice at this time. But the evidence thus far, that I have seen, is that she will be a cheerleader presidential contenders, and that being a democrat only means she is more enthusiastic about the democrat, not that she will go toe to toe with the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #70
84. re: "Now Obama has to ask democrats to hold republicans accountable?"
Yes, he does. And that will continue until election day.

In a Presidential year everything is cleared with the campaign. That has always been the case. You might get a few lowly house members popping off on local TV, but national media and message are coordinated through the campaign.

As to whether Hillary has spoken out against Republicans, not so much. Yet she genuinely hates Republicans, which Obama does not. People pursue interests and since she has been in the Senate her program was to make herself acceptable to the center.

This conversation is kind of funny because you may have a higher opinion of her than I do. I think she's almost a caricature of ruthlessness. I doubt friendship, even if real, would slow her down if she perceived a reason to go after someone. She's a slightly better human being than Bill is, but they have learned a lot from each other and given Bill's willingness to sell out anyone I wouldn't want to rely on being friends with either of them if push came to shove.

In any event, the VP decision won't fall to either of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #84
92. Its true
all our bantering here is an academic exercise at best.

"Yet she genuinely hates Republicans, which Obama does not."

I would love to see your evidences and reasonings on that pair of assertions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. Several months ago I made a similar "going to the mattresses" reference
and was pilloried for being a sexist pig. Sorry I can't get you off the hook, even for old times sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. It's not the least bit sexual -- I would have defended you if I saw that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Well for younger people it is a pretty obscure reference, I suppose
I'm sure there are plenty of well known movie references from the last 10 years that would be lost on me as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
67. You said "get off". That is sexist right there.
You will never learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. Damn it!
Never quote Abe Vigoda if you know what's good for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
31. Show me when Clintons ONCE took on Bushes from 2001-2007? You liked how they quickly
fought back on the Clintons trashed the WH story? How quickly did they fight back on Clinton was soft on terrorism story? Eight books came out between 9-11,2001 and 2006, and Bill never even tried fighting back till a FOX interview right before that 9-11 movie came out in Sept2006.

Clintons didn't lift a finger to change the narrative and certainly never fought back the way some of you claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. This is a really good point.
I didn't see her fighting against the bush debacle in the Senate.

Why the heck would I think she'd fight against McCain? I think McCain should ask her to be HIS VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
35. Well I can't say I'd agree with that tactic but I guess
if that's what she wants to do. (scrubbing Clinton/McCain mattress acrobatics thought away)x(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. Clark would do the same thing
The man is fearless and I think picking him would show absolute brilliance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
47. Why would anyone expect her to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
51. No.
It's a coordinated effort among some Clinton supporters mixed with a push by Corporate Media.

And if you think that Obama isn't taking to McCain, then you must not have turned your TV on yet today.

And BTW - the term is not 'take him to the mattresses.' The term as used in the Godfather is 'going to the mattresses,' meaning to hole up in a secure location in anticipation of a gang war.

Obama, starting yesterday, went to the mattresses. Without Clinton's help, thanks very much.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
55. I agree... kinda.
I am not especially rooting for Hillary, but I think she would be a good choice. There are others I think that may be better (Clark) but I would be fine with Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
57. I didn't get it either.
I loathe movies that romanticize the Mafia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
62. Can Hillary take McCain to the Mattress?
I posted on this yesterday. They are reported to be friendly with each other. And they certaintly didn't seem too keen on attacking each other during the primaries.

It has to be asked, can and will Hillary actually take McCain on in the rough n tumble fashion that is needed? Has she so far, or would she be constrained to just cheering on Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. We don't need a repeat of Lieberman's kissy, kissy with Dick Cheney
that we had during Gore's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #68
83. See post #17.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
63. and Joe Biden is not capable of doing that?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
10 Year Freeper Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
73. I agree
Hillary would ensure an Obama win.

She brings the disaffected feminists back, and fights like a seasoned and accomplished warrior...ruthless.

She fights to win, damn the cost.

While it would be incongruous with the general themes of the Obama campaign, she would turn the corner for them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. She fights to win
When has she fought her vodka drinking contest buddy McCain?

On the one hand, I like the idea that she can work across the isle and that they can have a congenial relationship outside the walls of the senate. Seems like the lack of that is part of why things have been so viscious. But will that allow her to take on McCain as needed? I asked anyone to show me her doing that, and came up empty. Would you care to step up to that challenge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
10 Year Freeper Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. No Incentive
Hillary is out for Hillary first, the party second.

Provide her with incentive and she will DESTROY McCain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. Really?
She went after Obama rough enough. I want to believe. But so far as I know, she hasn't been around Obama since 92, with the opportunity to cement a political friendship. Its one thing to take on a new guy for a job you have been virtually guaranteed to get. Its another to go down the smack down road with a former drinking buddy, For the benefit of your new "boss", after already having the wind knocked out of your sails by said new boss.

I don't buy the Hillary as an Inhuman Terminator argument. She is human, and as subject to frustration, dejection, second thoughts, and all the rest as any of the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #78
88. That's right, tell her: President Hillary 2016 and she will
destroy McCain and burn all his 7 houses and break Cindy's good arm :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
85. If she was a dedicated Dem she would gladly do it regardless of whether she is VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
89. What a lovely double entendre!
I think that's a possibility (taking him "to the mattresses") since she's better aligned with McCain than Obama.

No DLC! Not anywhere! They are done screwing the party.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
90. No, it is not. It is because the corporate wing of the Dem party would rather see
us lose than see us win because if progressives win, the corporatist cockroaches lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klyon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
93. I would rather she took him to the floor
the mattress sounds to much like another Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
95. Hey, watch it!!!
There IS a limit to what Hillary will do for the party.......

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlotta Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
97. It's Obama's job to take McCain to the mattress.
Do women have to do everything????:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. A woman's work is never done.
Even in politics......

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
99. Unfortunately, when she got in bed with him earlier this year ...
... she probably took McCain to the mattress the only way she will.

Has anyone yet heard Hillary attack McCain the way she attacked Obama? Hell No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. See post #17.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC