Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry saw Swift Boat Problem way back!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:22 PM
Original message
Kerry saw Swift Boat Problem way back!
FOX News just showed part of an interview with the Admiral who is involved in SBVs.

He said Kerry called him March 16 to try & work something out...to make peace. The admiral refused.

A Kerry spokesman was on & confirmed this story.

I thought the Swift Boat Controversy was a recent development. But this goes way back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. kerry saw it way back, like 30 years ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Then why wasn't Kerry ready to respond for two weeks after the ads aired?
There is no excuse for Kerry's campaign giving the Swift Liars two weeks of coverage without a strong response.

They knew who was involved, they knew about the connections to the Bush campaign, and yet they let the Swift Liars attack him for two weeks without mounting a counter attack.

Kerry waited and then reacted to polls showing him taking a hit, rather than going on the attack as soon as the attacks started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Who says they weren't ready?
They didn't respond immediately -- you can speculate why, but you don't know why.

Perhaps they wanted to draw it out so the counterattack would pack more punch. Perhaps they wanted to see their internal polling so they could plan the counterattack more effectively. Perhaps they wanted to wait till the media started destroying the smearers credibility. Or, perhaps John Kerry, despite the fact that he hasn't lost an election in 30 years, is totally inept at running a campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. No, no, no.
The only possible reason is that Kerry is weak and foolish. It's what some of these people console themselves with, and should Kerry not beat Bush, you will hear it for the rest of the time you follow politics.

There are two kinds of politicians: tough guys, like Bush, and wimps, like Dukakis. Nothing in between. Bush is stupid, yet everyone should campaign exactly like he does. Kerry is controlled by consultants; Bush, on the other hand, has no handlers and follows his instincts. Notice that again: Kerry is smart, and most everyone would agree to that, and I don't think too many people would argue that Bush is the sharpest needle in the pincushion. Yet these people have swallowed the notion that Bush somehow follows his own instincts in running his campaign! If it makes sense to you, explain it to me some time.

For some of these people, I strongly suspect their hatred of Bush is only a thin veneer that covers a much deeper admiration for him, kind of like the dog that loves the master who beats him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!!!!!!!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. It was an most excellent post! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
31. In this age of weblogs and 24/7 news channels, it was a dumb gamble
and Kerry has a slip in the polls to show for it. Though he is now riding the wave of vindication, the delay reinforced the Bush camp's accusation that Kerry is vauge and indecisive, and I fear that he has alienated some swing voters permanently.

Kerry should have issued a statement the minute the Smear-Boaters made their debut, then let his response team handle the rest. Think of how much prettier he'd be sitting if he had said something like, "This is obviously a politically-orchestrated attempt to divert attention from Mr. Bush's miltary record" or "Business as usual--the same thing happened to McCain and Cleland four years ago."

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
41. If your first two perhapses are true then perhaps your third one is true.
But I doubt any of them are true. Here's my perhaps, whichis perhaps something a little more accurate than a perhaps: That although some within the campaign who wanted to hit back immediately and viciously, they knew that some of the operations needed to mount an immediate and effective response were not up to snuff. Perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Kerry let it fester on purpose
In the end, it will hurt Bu$h a lot more than it has hurt Kerry, if he plays his cards right.

Patience, grasshopper.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snyder Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Kerry Was Caught Napping
When, oh when, will the Democratic Party realize that you don't sit there and "take the high road" when the other side is sliming you? Is Kerry going to take two weeks to respond to every false charge the Bush people make? Come on, Kerry, get on the stick would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. You wait until you can nail them really good
and then you slam them.

Kerry now has solid evidence in his hands, connecting the Bush Campaign to the Swift Boat Vets. I'm talking written contracts, not just he said, she said stuff.

You ain't seen nothing yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. The SBV's kicked Kerry right in the balls
And it took him 2 weeks to gain his senses and fight back. I am afraid it may be too little too late. He should have kicked the Bush camp in the balls at the very beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. According to press reports, Kerry's appearance at the
VFW was the turning point.

I think that his tin-ear staff were ready to let it fester but Kerry was personally affronted at his reception. You could see it in his face when he got off the plane in Boston.

He finally got the message and returned to Boston where he reportedly kept his staff awake all night hammering out a rebuttal strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. He did that on purpose
that's his MO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
36. Take this pebble from my hand. Kerry has plenty of kungfu masters
who are guiding him, no doubt, behind the scene. Masters who can share first hand knowledge of tangling with the force....Big Dog, the lovable Bore, the Screamer and even Mad Max Cleland. Damn, there oughtta be a Marvel comic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I'm hearing they didn't expect the media to pick it up and run
with it. So you're right. There is no excuse...... Why in the world would they not expect the HEATHERS media to give this big airtime??? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Rope-a-dope
Yes, there is always a method to the madness.

It seems there is some Kerry camp strategy in play. This might just work in his favor eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. Precisely.
Had the Kerry Campaign been on the ball then they would have had started debunking claims immediately; pushing back with TV talking head rebuttals; and, most effectively, infiltrated an operative into the organization for inside dirt.

I think that it's pretty obvious that neither Kerry nor his advisers recognized the kind of traction that the SBVT book and claims were going to achieve. My guess is that neither of them really understood the depth of alienation and bitterness that Kerry's anti-war activities created among vets--- especially his former SB comrades.

If Kerry wins I think that one of the greatest endeavors Kerry could undertake to distinguish his uniting administration from the devisive Bush era would be to have a private fence-mending session with the SBVT. Make it a weekend at Camp David with NO press reports.

I guarantee that Kerry will win over some of the vets and the others will at least respect the POTUS enough not to slag him anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. The admiral was mad because of the way he came out in Brinkley's book.
Brinkley is a historian. He can't sugarcoat what he learns. Vietnam was a failure of leadership in many ways, on the ground and in DC. The Admiral made decisions that cost too many lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have not read Brinkleys book
& I do not know what their differences are, but the Admiral was offerred access to Brinkley & Kerry s notes. He refused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A_Possum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Is this Hoffman? He doesn't come off all that bad
in Tour of Duty. The main diss of him in the book isn't from KERRY, it's from others. Even smearvet Larry Thurlow is quoted as saying, "That man wanted in the worst way to be admiral. That's what (Operation) Sealords was about."

And then later, Brinkley says, "In an oral history recorded by the Naval Historical Foundation, for example, Kolbe (another swift vet) discussed the downsides of Operation Sealords, particularly working for Captain Roy Hoffman, whom he described as "an absolute mirror image" of Robert Duvall's brutish character in Apocalypse Now, who said he like the "sweet smell of napalm in the morning."

Other swift vets say similar things about Hoffman's gung-ho attitude.

If he's all pissy about how he comes off in TOUR OF DUTY, he ought to be blaming a lot of other guys. Or maybe himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I know. Kerry was pretty respectful in the book. But he blames Kerry
for the way Brinkley did his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, now he looks like a jerk for not standing up for him
Edited on Thu Aug-26-04 05:37 PM by rocknation
because by extension, he would have been standing up for the Navy, too. But he let his personal feelings get in the way, and I hope he gets accused of being down with the Smear-Voters now that Kerry's been vindicated. Aren't they supposed to respect the uniform if they can't respect the person wearing it?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. this is their Willie Horton
They expected these ads to run without any counterpoint. They've had this stuff in the works for a year or more.

They've been surprised on that acocunt. Reopening old wounds isn't working nearly as well as the thugs thought it would.

Kerry really needs to sue Regenery for libel. Only then will it be clear he's taking this stuff very seriously and he is not tacitly admitting any of it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snyder Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Libel Suit A Waste
Kerry's a public figure. To get a libel judgment, Kerry would have to prove that the statements were false and that they were made with reckless disregard for the truth. This is a very difficult legal standard to meet. The defense would be that different people remember the same thing in different ways, and that the Swiftliars found enough people with different viewpoints to nullify a "reckless disregard" rap.

Libel suits by public figures are rare to begin with, and I can't remember the last time one has succeeded. Usually, when a public figure brings such a suit, it's by an actor or actress over a private issue, such as when Carol Burnett whacked The National Enquirer for falsely reporting that she was drunk in a restaurant. If I'm not mistaken, Burnett was able to argue that for purposes of the article she was a private figure and therefore the lower standard of negligence should apply.

I suppose Kerry could file the lawsuit against Regnery as a publicity stunt, but I really doubt that it would accomplish much other than to have the media clucking its tongues over how Kerry's skin is too thin. This one has to be played out in the court of public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Dubya's people got "Fortunate Son" buried for a time.

And the author conveniently committed suicide too. Dubya is a lucky guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. NONE of the smear-boaters witnessed what happened
Edited on Thu Aug-26-04 10:49 PM by rocknation
Except maybe the guy who won a medal for being under the same enemy fire that he claimed Kerry WASN'T under. So I don't see how the "different people remember the same thing in different ways" defense would apply. I wonder if they interviewed people whose stories coorborated Kerry's and were rejected because they didn't fit. Maybe conspiracy to commit fraud would be a more appropriate charge.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snyder Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. I'd Love to Be Wrong
but I think a libel suit is whistling past the graveyard, and more importantly I think the media would report it as such
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. remember people in march these people had conference
adn news channels covered it. they were there saying they had a list of over two hundred. we saw. we all knew. just forgotten. the news went onto there conference and cut them off and that was the last we heard from them. two day story most adn they were put in there place

it was there for us to see. kerry didnt think the story would fly. why should it. didnt last time. a bunch of lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsMyParty Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kerry got blown away by "content" not that they were going to attack
He knew (lord suggestions of it were flashed all over months ago)that they were going to go after him on his anti-war activities when he returned from 'Nam. He didn't know they were going to hit like they did (though common sense would have him think 'McCain' and more recently, "Max" and be prepared). They also made a very bad mistake that has been reported by several media that the campaign's advice was to "let it blow over" because they didn't think it would be big (how utterly dumb once they saw the ad). In fact they all fought about it until the wee hours of the morning before John went on the offensive over it. Instincts have to be sharper on this campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. It seems to me

that the Kerry Campaign was anticipating an attack on his anti-war activities and wanted to diffuse that by featuring his meritorious service prior to his Senate testimony, medal throwing, etc. I think that was what the 'band of brothers' at the convention was all about. It probably never crossed their collective minds that BUSHCO would stoop that low. They never thought that his purple hearts, bronze star or silver star could be questioned much less lied about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Then they're either ignorant or stupid or both.
In the SC primary "third parties" questioned whether McCain was "mentally fit" to be CinC because of his torture in 'Nam. In Georgia Cleland was linked to Osama.

If your staff doesn't know the opponent well enough to at least research their past tactics then they shouldn't be playing at this level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. They were spreading rumors that he was a Manchurian Candidate
to be precise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. ...and push-polling to make sure that SC Repubs knew about...
McCain's "Black 'love child'".

Anybody who didn't realize that a campaign against a Bush means a bath in filth from "third parties" is obviously not paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kerry saw this coming, so he pulled Rassmann out of the river
to try and head off the inevitable attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scorpious_Maximus Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
28. The Plan


I think the Kerry Camp has played this correctly.


Tom Oliphant of The Boston Globe said it best;

"As happened to O'Neill in 1971, the best counter to him today is the serious press attention that his group fears most."


Let the media do the heavy lifting on this, as they are starting to do, with a little prodding by people like us!


The SwiftVets are self destructing. Ignore the polls. Election Day matters, not some poll 68 days out.


More from Oliphant


http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/08/22/smear_by_veterans_may_hurt_bush/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Oh you mean like the did the heavy lifting for Dukakis
Edited on Fri Aug-27-04 09:06 AM by Classical_Liberal
when he was being Hortenized. Like they did the heavy lifting reporting on Iraq. No way! Never trust the media to give a shit about truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddem43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. Oliphant is living in the past when he trusts the press
to get out the truth. He ignores the current reality of too many talking heads with too little real news to talk about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michigandem2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. watchign today there is NO objectivity
anymore...its all so opinionated and giving THEIR views...and I sit there and just judge every word they say as if "are they against Kerry or for them" and within 2 or 3 words you can basically tell who they are routing for...its really so aggrevating...the media is more Opinion than truth or fact and that is just sick and WRONG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. The consequences of a dead Fairness Doctrine.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5by5 Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #28
45. Campaign strategy
In the end, the Bushies don't really care whether the Swift Boat Veterans are discredited or not because their objectives will have been achieved:
1) Keep Kerry off-message at a time when he needs to build a lead.
2) Innoculate Bush from an "October suprise" on his National Guard service.

The first point I think is obvious. Kerry relied too strongly on his Vietnam service coming out of the convention so he's vulnerable.

The second relies on the belief that there are skeletons in Bush's closet and they will come out, probably at the worst possible time--just like the old DWI. But with the Swifties stirring everything up now, no one will have any appetite for a rehash against Bush later.

Win-win for Bush. If Kerry doesn't respond effectively, Swifties come forward, one per news cycle, until the Nov 2. If the Democrats use their October surprise today, then Bush benefits by having it out early and he was still able to keep Kerry off-message for a month.

Regardless of the polls, Bush is clearly winning the campaign strategy battle right now.

There's still time to turn it around but so far I haven't seen any evidence of the skill.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yes they knew. But they DIDN'T know Bush would help them directly
The scale of the attack took them by surprise because it was so well organized and funded. However, Bush is in it up to his eyeballs and payback wil be a bitch. And we know Bush was involved or else his lawyer wouldn't have quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPAgainstGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
37. THAT CLOWN ON FOX IS A PAID FOR WHORE FOR BUSH!!!!
We know that for a fact!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob in B_more Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
44. Shrub ha made it a poison pill for the convention.
NYT has him complementing his service, how can they go into the convention and rail about this with out being seen as being in bed with the SBliars, they would be flipflopers. They will probably surprise me with thei evilness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
46. Do we have a link for this? I'm compiling a file on the SBVT
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC