Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holy Crap: AP Explains Why Swift Boat Accounts Radically Differ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 06:44 PM
Original message
Holy Crap: AP Explains Why Swift Boat Accounts Radically Differ
Past presidential candidates and their critics have been known to shade the truth for political purposes. But to memory researchers, it doesn't take intentional falsifying to understand the discrepancies in the retelling of Sen. John Kerry's war experiences.

Far from being an indelible recording, human memory is fragile, incomplete, malleable and highly subject to suggestion, researchers have shown in dozens of studies.

Where does this leave Americans trying to evaluate Kerry's war record? Researchers say some memories obviously are true. But they tend to favor the ones expressed soonest afterward, especially when backed by documentation from the time.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&e=5&u=/ap/cvn_fog_of_war

Jesus Christ, you have to read this hunk of crap for yourself. Extra points for anyone who remembers the Geraldo Rivera quote about the "fog of war."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. anyone who would make statements
like these jerks did after 35 years when there are contemporaneous reports is stupid and a fool. Kerry kept notes that he could read as a refresher. The BDA (battle damage assessments) and after action reports have all proved the not so swifties wrong.
This is just so much reptile b.s.
At my reunion of Vietnam hosp. the stories-changes-fragments and things that were totally erased were incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Newest memories are the truest
That favors Kerry's account.

SWVfT memories are newest and have been molded by groupthink.

Rosebud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's why I think most are not "lying" per se
But instead have had their memories "refreshed" by liars who hate Kerry for his VVAW work, O'Neill being the principle liar among them.

I think most of the guys have been duped. Classic Rove mindgame with a small set of willing - REPUBLICAN - accomplices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Actually blaming their account on groupthink
serves our purposes better.

It was Roy Hoffman being depicted as the Robert Duvall character in Apocalypse Now that set off the chain the most recent animus. People got together and filled in fading memories with false memories. Many people who are currently somewhat believing the SBVfT may be more likely to buy decent people with memories that have been created by exposure to other's memories than the more likely nefarious Rove machine.

Rosebud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't need a psychologist to explain what's going on here
these people are lying.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6.  agreed, it's not that complicated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. lying because they want to get even with Kerry for post war
Edited on Sat Aug-28-04 09:55 PM by spooky3
activities or because they have other political objectives.

Even a law school reject would be able to reveal their total lack of credibility in a courtroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King of New Orleans Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. John O'neil
Edited on Sat Aug-28-04 07:09 PM by King of New Orleans
Got these guys in a room, made sure anyone or any evidence that would make them think otherwise wasn't in that room, Got a small core of guys willing to say Kerry lied, then got the rest of these guys to sign affidavits saying they believed these guys and now as the evidence and eyewitnesses come out, the Al French's and George Eliott's look like complete dupes, utter idiots taken along for a ride. John O'neil really screwed them over good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. AP assists w/ GOP Swift Boat endgame
which has always been to call it a draw--Bush may have been AWOL, Kerry may have lied about his medals. The whores knew this was the resolution the GOP wanted all along--and now they're giving it to them.

Sadly, both the GOP and media knew that the dems, after playing a little rope-a-dope judo chess, would take this "deal" to get rid of the issue, and they will. As the media and talking heads reach the conclusion that "memory is imperfect" and we will "never know the truth" no Dem surrogates will say "Swift Liars," no Dems surrogate will push back hard when a Judy, Tweet, and Wolf announce the "conclusion" of the Swift boat controversy.

A new lesson will have been learned by politicians and the media: You can say anything about your opponent and unless you can be proven to be a liar 110%, the worst you will do is a draw.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Excellent point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. This Was My Exact Point - In The Fog of War Everybody Is Right
Bullshit. These guys are demonstrably lying beyond a reasonable doubt (you can never be 100%, but journalism never said you did).

If the Kerry people don't push this hard (and I've given them plenty of patience), journalists will forever add the caveat that "some people" have questioned Kerry's record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. You're half right--it's crap!
...But to memory researchers, it doesn't take intentional falsifying to understand the discrepancies in the retelling of Sen. John Kerry's war experiences.

I've got two words for you--"THEY LIED!!!" Or is this the media's way of making excuses for the Smear-Voters making fools of THEM, too?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. "Intentional Falsifying" - So Friggin' Scared To Say "Lying"
The dude from Spinsanity was just talking about this on the Daily Show a few days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snyder Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. I Don't Think The Article Is As Bad ...
Edited on Sat Aug-28-04 07:27 PM by snyder
... as others here do. The issue isn't so much the memories themselves but the way in which the Swiftliars and the Bush campaign have used them. Frankly, the story is even more damn in a way. It makes it possible for Kerry's people to fairly accuse Bush of taking advantage of traumatized veterans. That said, my original complaint about Kerry waiting too long to come back at this still stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. If the article doesn't examine people getting paid to lie, it's bullshit
Edited on Sat Aug-28-04 08:16 PM by Democat
They can make all the excuses they want, but many of these people are on the Bush payroll and they have been paid a lot of money to lie.

That's the bottom line and if this article or any other article leaves out that possibility, then it's just making excuses for these paid liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Coordinated and with a clear hierarchy.
Much like Abu Ghraib, there is a chain of command to the coordination of the Smearboat Lie. From the TOOLS at the bottom who were used to do the wetwork, to the TOP. Smirk and Turd Blossom, fantasizing their twisted psyops Atwater Fu.
Suffering and lies. It more than what they do, it's WHO they ARE. Bleah. Ptui.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
volosong Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Eyewitness Reports are the Least Reliable
That is the feeling in law enforcement and in the courts. No better anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. If only we had some sort of data,
recorded in a kind of officially recognized institution that is widely accepted as an accurate representation of historical fact.

...Oh, WAIT! We Do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. You Guys Lose - Here's The Geraldo Story (Hilarious!)
During one satellite dispatch, Geraldo frantically ducked for cover, claiming a bullet had narrowly missed his noggin. Viewers were left to wonder whether it had been fired by an al Qaeda sniper or a disgruntled member of Geraldo's own crew.

In another memorable segment, our daring correspondent lithely descended a cave to hunt for signs of bin Laden, a search that die-hard Geraldo fans hoped would end at Al Capone's vault.

So far, though, the highlight of his Afghan adventure was an emotional report from the ``hallowed ground'' where three U.S. soldiers accidentally had been killed by an errant American bomb.

Reported Geraldo: ``It was just, the whole place, just fried really, and bits of uniforms and tattered clothing everywhere. I said the Lord's prayer and really choked up.''

One tiny problem: Geraldo wasn't anywhere near the site of the fatal bombing. He transmitted his story from Tora Bora, hundreds of miles from Kandahar, where the friendly-fire tragedy occurred.

This rather humongous factual error was pointed out in a critical article by David Folkenflik, the television writer for The Baltimore Sun.

In response, Geraldo blamed ``the fog of war.'' He said he had ``confused'' two separate incidents and actually had been at the scene where two or three Afghan fighters -- not the American troops -- had been killed.

Unfortunately, that version of the story hasn't held up well, either. The Pentagon told Folkenflik that the friendly-fire deaths at Tora Bora occurred three days after Geraldo filed his initial report.

Wrote Folkenflik: ``Fox News did not have any explantation for how Rivera could have been confused by an event that had not yet occurred.''

http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1230-05.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC