Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Four lines of attack today from the Kerry camp

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 10:39 PM
Original message
Four lines of attack today from the Kerry camp
Statement from Kerry Communications Director on Laura Bush's Comments in Support of Swift Boat Smears in Time Magazine

8/29/2004 1:43:00 PM
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=35358

WASHINGTON, Aug. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Kerry-Edwards Communications Director Stephanie Cutter issued the following statement today in response to comments from Laura Bush in Time Magazine:

"Mrs. Bush's statement in support of the Swift Boat smear ads is more sad evidence that these attacks have been coordinated from the top down at the White House. The president still stubbornly refuses to repudiate these lies. John McCain knows from personal experience that these attacks are shameful and wrong. The president should answer McCain's call to renounce these lies once and for all."
________________________________

Statement by John Edwards on President Bush's Attempt to Blame the Military for his Own Miscalculations in Iraq

8/29/2004 1:53:00 PM
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=35359

WASHINGTON, Aug. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Vice Presidential Candidate John Edwards today released the following statement in response to President Bush's statement that the challenges we face in Iraq are a result of a "catastrophic success - being so successful so fast that an enemy that should have surrendered or been done in escaped and lived to fight another day:" (Time magazine, 8/29/04)

"President Bush now says his Iraq policy is a catastrophic success. He's half right. It was catastrophic to rush to war without a plan to win the peace. It was catastrophic to ignore the warnings of the military leadership about the risks of an unstable post-war Iraq. It was catastrophic to dismiss warnings of creating chaotic terrorists havens as today's New York Times accurately describes. And it was catastrophic to tell the American public that rebuilding Iraq would not burden the American taxpayers with a bill of $200 billion and rising.

"The most disturbing part of the president's statement is the suggestion that somehow our military is at fault for moving too fast before the enemy was 'done in.' Our troops fought magnificently in Iraq. Their efforts can only be described as an unqualified success. I didn't think 'shock and awe' was designed to move slowly.

"A Commander-in-Chief should never take our nation to war without a plan to win the peace. Real leadership means taking responsibility for your decisions good and bad. Our troops and our nation deserve better. "In one sense, President Bush is right with his new campaign slogan 'catastrophic success.' His successful misleading of the American public is truly catastrophic."
_____________________________________

Kerry: Bush's Miscalculations Have Hurt Steelworkers; Put Politics Before Steelworkers

8/29/2004 4:25:00 PM

WASHINGTON, Aug. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Following is a release of Kerry-Edwards 2004:

Kerry spokesperson Phil Singer: "Bush has played politics with the steel industry from day one, and his miscalculations have hurt steelworkers. First he said free trade should govern, then he imposed tariffs, but then he pulled the tariffs before the steel industry could recover. We need steady leadership when it comes to helping steelworkers not political posturing."

After articulating a case for free trade in the 2000 campaign, Bush imposed steel tariffs in March 2002. Then, he repealed the steel tariffs early, which the steelworkers said was a "sorry betrayal of American steelworkers and steel communities" LA Times, 12/5/03, "Bush Rescinds Steel Tariffs, Says Aims Met"

Bush Put in Place Tariffs To Help Steel Industry Which Was in Dire Condition. In March 2002, tariffs were implemented to safeguard the steel industry from unfair trade. These tariffs were supposed to remain in place for three years. The tariffs were resulted from a rare 6-0 ITC vote, following one of the more exhaustive investigations in the Commission's history. Steel prices collapsed, reaching 20-year lows in 2001. Steel companies lost $4 billion in 2001 and $1.6 billion in 2002. (USW)

Bush Flop: Bush Rescinds Steel Tariffs. "Facing a potential global trade war, President Bush on (December 4, 2003) lifted tariffs he imposed on foreign steel 21 months ago, declaring the U.S. steel industry healthy and ready to compete despite the industry's claim that it needs more time to recover." (Chicago Tribune, 12/5/03) Washington Post, 12/7/03, "Bush Lifts Steel Tariffs Early, Angering unions"

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=35361
________________________________

Kerry: Nothing Complicated About Bush's Failure to Protect Coal Miners

8/29/2004 3:37:00 PM

WASHINGTON, Aug. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Following is a release of Kerry-Edwards 2004:

Kerry-Edwards spokesperson Phil Singer said: There's nothing complicated about the fact that George Bush broke his promise to invest in coal's future and failed to protect coal miners. The fact is that George W. Bush broke his promise to the voters of West Virginia. Sen. Byrd says he just "walked away." No wonder he's lashing out on the campaign trail, misleading the public about his record. John Kerry knows that coal mining creates jobs and believes that with the right investment and commitment coal will be an even cleaner part of America's energy future.

On Campaign Trail Bush Promised to Protect Coal. "At a campaign stop at Harris Riverfront Park on Oct. 2 (2000), Bush promised to protect coal and steel" (The Herald-Dispatch (WV), 11/8/00)

In 2000 Bush Said He Would Provide $2 Billion to "Develop Clean Coal Technologies." "'I'm going to develop domestic supplies to make us less dependent on foreign supplies,'" he (Bush) says. 'What I won't do is tinker with the strategic petroleum reserves; those are meant for times of war or major disruption. What I will do is encourage oil and gas exploration as well as develop clean coal technologies - (at a cost of) $2 billion, for starters - that will enable us to use the abundance of coal that we have in the country in an environmentally friendly way.'" (The Herald Dispatch (WV), 10/3/00)

Bush Cut Funding for Mine Safety Enforcement by $15 Million. In President Bush's requests to Congress, he has cut $15 million for Mine Safety Enforcement since taking office. (AFL-CIO, analysis of Budget Requests from FY 2002-2005)

Senator Byrd Criticized Bush for Underfunding Clean Coal Program. "Other cuts would be made in the Clean Coal Technology program and the National Energy Technology Laboratory with campuses in Morgantown and Pittsburgh. 'During his campaign, candidate George Bush pledged to commit $ 2 billion over 10 years to the Clean Coal Technology program,' Byrd said. 'This is the third year in a row that the president's budget fails to match his $ 2 billion campaign promise.'" (Charleston Gazette (WV), 2/5/03)

more: http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=35360



Do you follow our candidate's agenda? In addition to (http://www.johnkerry.com) there is this alternative site for detailed releases that you can inform yourself with and blast to your local outlets: (http://releases.usnewswire.com/)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. All of it's defensive
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed.
It is time to go on the attack. Take the fight right at these bastards, force them to try to defend themselves (point being that the Bush administration has no adequate defense).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. There has been a steady offense. You can't slam our candidate because you
Edited on Sun Aug-29-04 10:59 PM by bigtree
didn't happen to find all of his policy prescriptions in these releases. Go to his site and read his positive plans for our nation. More web users have been reported to have gone to his site than to the republicans. Get involved!


You can't be following John Kerry's campaign closely and come away
with the impression that his campaign isn't hitting back hard enough.
Unless you are relying on his detractors in the mainstream media for your info.

Here's a good source for releases that aren't on his site and don't always make the network news. http://releases.usnewswire.com /

Kerry Campaign: Halliburton Goes for Gold - In Scandal Pentathlon
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=133-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards 2004 Releases Fact Sheet on Bush-Cheney Ad
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=134-08 ...

White House Again Refuses to Condemn Blatantly False Ad, Says Kerry-Edwards 2004
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=144-08 ...

Statement from Kerry Advisor Rand Beers on President's Remarks in Florida
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=137-08 ...

Statement by John Kerry on the Selection of Porter Goss to be Director of CIA
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=136-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards 2004 Fact Sheet: George Bush's Failed Fiscal Policies
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=119-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards 2004 Releases Report: Bush's Failed Fiscal Policies; Former Treasury Secretary to Discuss Report on 11:30 a.m. Call
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=117-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards: Committed to Ensuring Nevada Does Not Become A Nuclear Waste Repository
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=108-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards 2004 Releases Bush-Cheney Ad Fact Check: "Ownership"
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=133-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards Campaign Response to Bush Radio Address
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=104-08 ...

Kerry Campaign Response to Latest Misleading Bush-Cheney Ad - 'Clockwork'
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=146-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards 2004 Fact Sheet: Aug. 6 Anniversary -- Three Years Later, Problems Still Exist
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=131-08 ...

Kerry Statement on Latest Jobs Numbers
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=124-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards 2004: Halliburton Fined for Accounting Gimmicks While Cheney was CEO
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=140-08 ...

Kerry-Edwards Fact Sheet: Dick Cheney's Legislative Accomplishments ... Both of Them
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=142-08 ...

Kerry Campaign: George W. Bush - We Agree, Results Matter
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=125-08 ...

Kerry Campaign Reality Check: White House Claims on Implementing 9/11 Commission Recommendations
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=122-08 ...

Did He Really Say That? -- Kerry-Edwards Campaign Comment on Remarks by Sen. Zell Miller on 'Meet The Press'
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=103-08 ...


more: http://www.usnewswire.com/topnews/current.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Is it still true that half
of a good offense is a good defense? O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Ding Ding Ding! RevRussel, you're our grand prize winner!
Edited on Mon Aug-30-04 01:03 AM by rocknation
Is is still true that half of a good offense is a good defense? O8)

The first release does a great job of defending Kerry against the Smear-Boat Liars, but it lacks an offense. A question or two about Bush's military record or the Smear-Boaters links to the Bush campaign would have been the crowning touch.

The second release is okay, if a paragraph too long. But it lacks an offense--Edwards should have suggested Kerry has a way to win the peace packaged and ready to go.

The steel worker releases actually present a solution, but it's buried in the overly long preliminaries. All that's needed is a paragraph or two outlining how Bush screwed up, then come in with the Kerry solution.

We're not slamming Kerry, we're not slamming you, and we know you have to get around a hostile mainstream media. The problem is that the undecided voters we need see Kerry mainly through national TV and newspapers, and what they're seeing is someone who seems to be a little unfocused and hesistant to stand up to Bush.

That's why I've been particularly happy with your recent moves. Kerry laughed off the Smear-Boaters on The Daily Show, and running a commerical that you knew would embarrass McCain so much he'd HAVE to ask Kerry to pull it was pure genius. Bush has painted himself into a corner by admitting that the believes Kerry served honorably while refusing to condemn the Smear-Boaters. I hope Kerry capitalizes on that by starting to have Bush's military record exposed--and if McCain starts to make trouble for Kerry again, just re-run that commercial!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. you didn't read all of the releases where I indicated 'more'
There is the Kerry plan. Stop with the defeatist slams. Sounds like the opposition response. Why don't you add your own positive outlook on the issues raised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nothing positive there
Edited on Sun Aug-29-04 10:56 PM by Armstead
How would Kerry have handled the steel situation?

He needs to havce clear policies on things like free trade. What are his priorities? Does he side with big business or the people?

He's got to start being for some clear directions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Do some work. You have a search engine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I applaud your zeal
Edited on Sun Aug-29-04 11:05 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
but it is naive to assume the people you are talking to are actually on your side.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I recognize the critics. I wish they would display some positives
about our candidacy. Otherwise the criticism rings hollow in the face of the alternative, Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I shouldn't have come off so harsh.
Edited on Sun Aug-29-04 11:28 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
You are doing good work, that's exactly where people should be going for their campaign info, not CNN. It is our job to use these as seeds to develop our own talking points and spread the message.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I'm talking about the tone
A press release when you have to read to the bottom to get to something useful is not an effective political message.

Maybe I'm knitpicking, but there's not enough meat being thrown out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. You are preaching to the choir...
People here are already convinced...

I watched the news all day, & read all the Sunday papers...

I did not hear these messages.

The messages of the day were Repubs will begin convention &

New York City has huge-anti war & anti-Bush protests that are peaceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. If this is putting me to sleep...
I doubt that most people will get past the title. Nothing against Kerry, but it's a sad state of affairs if this is the best the campaign can come up with.

They need to take lessons from Clark and Dean. A no-holds barred, Bush-bashing sound bite does much more damage than a 10,000 word press release.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Agreed
they need to inject more flair into their attacks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. This was good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. AM kick
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC