Terry McAuliff just gave weak, lame performance on O'lielly

[IrishBloodEngHeart]

can we please get people that know how to engage these people and don't roll over?

[Malva Zebrina]

1. Randi said today that he is going on Hannity and predicted

the same for him. She did not seem to think it was a good idea.

[lancdem]

2. That's where Joe Lockhart will be a huge asset

I expect he'll be doing a lot of interviews. He did a great job during the Sandy Berger brouhaha.

[Sensitivity]

3. We have to stop playing the "politics as usual" esp re. Repub lies, slime

etc.

[Catfight]

4. EXACTLY, McAuliff wa a total wuss. He obviously was the bottom

of that love fest. McAuliff needs to go, he's needed to go for a long time now. He's let all this stuff slide, Kerry should be way up with Bush's poor record. At this point, Bush should have been thinking about dumping Cheney...but then again, maybe after Cheney accepts the VP role, it'll be time for the Democrats to really ROLL. Bush/Satan ticket looks good.

[cheshire]

5. I like to call him Bull O'Really

[LTR]

6. Terry's a weenie

The DNC has some pretty credible people. Shit, Howard Dean and Wes Clark practically destroy Hannity every time they go on his show. Send them.

As far as O'Really goes, he ain't shit. Anyone is capable of handling him. Except for McCaullife, I guess.

[fearnobush]

7. The DNC really has no clue. Why do I have to argue their debates

on TV? Why they don't speak out and often about the most serious BFEE crimes is beyond me. I long for the days of Clinton 1992, when the DNC hit bush like a 900,000 ton hammer.

[Cascadian]

8. I hope he steps down after 2004.

Regardless if Kerry wins or not. I really do. I was never impressed with him and that interview confirms what I think of him. He is one of the reasons the Democratic Party lost it's spine. If anybody could do a better job than McAuliff it would be Howard Dean. Just my honest opinion.


John

[Awsi Dooger]

9. McAuliffe is obviously hard working and determined to the cause

But not even a threat of brilliance. Or deceit.

Very frustrating when the opposition leaders have demonstrated hints of the former, and limitless supplies of the latter.