Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When the history of this campaign is written....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:48 PM
Original message
When the history of this campaign is written....
It will have turned on Kerry walking into the Rove trap...

{If I knew then, what I know now, I STILL would have voted for IWR.}

This is the discussion they have been having on Hardball.

Do you think this is correct? The panelists agreed it is much more important than Swiftboats, etc.



Note:sorry, my computer is missing quotes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
childslibrarian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is the Rove Trap?
For those of us that don't feel watching is good for our blood pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Rove Trap
was that John Kerry voted yes on IWR.

If he continued to support that vote, then it would be hard to criticize Bush on Iraq.

And they figured he would continue to say yes.

The panel said he thinks like a Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, right
The election has two months to go and they're doing a Kerry postmortem? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. They were not saying Kerry would lose
because of that vote.

They were saying it was really important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Same caliber of pricks who insisted stocks would outperform bonds
in 2004.

They're paid to sell sofas and tanning salon handjobs.

Nothing to see here.

Shut it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. "When the history of this campaign is written.."
Edited on Tue Aug-31-04 07:57 PM by NYC Liberal
It will say that Kerry unseated Bush in a huge landslide, despite the "nattering nabobs of negativity"... also known as "reporters."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
istruthfull Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't get it
I don't get it. Bush goes down the road and finds out it is the wrong road but stays on it and he is a strong leader. Kerry goes down the road and finds out that it is the wrong road and adjust his course to the correct road and he is a flip-flop? The first is stupid and the second is intelligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. When was the last time you heard a legitimate issue on Hardball?
I can just hear Chris being so ernest about this.

Lightweight. Entertaining at times, but a lightweight.

History will remember the wars. How then turn out. Do you know who voted for the Tonkin Gulf resolution? Neither do I. But I do know that LBJ pushed it. He gets the blame.

History will remember Iraq. The war, not the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Daily Howler explains why Kerry's statement produced a flap...
http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh081204.shtml

Why has Kerry’s statement produced a flap, since he has said the same thing many times in the past?In large part, it’s because of the way this statement has been framed in the press. In particular, the flap seems to turn, not on what Kerry said, but on what question he was answering. And depending on what news org you read, you seem to get a wide array of explanations of that.

To what question was Kerry responding when he made this familiar statement? Amazingly, no—we can’t find a transcript of the question Kerry was asked. And you know what happens in situations like that—inventive journalists start embellishing! What was Kerry asked that day? Every news org seems to spell it out differently. Here’s what Candy Crowley said in real time on CNN:

CROWLEY (4/9/04): Welcome back to Inside Politics. As we reported earlier, John Kerry, traversing the countryside, is in the Grand Canyon in Arizona. He was stopped by reporters and talked a bit. He was asked the question that George Bush put out there, which is, If you knew then what you now know, would you still have voted for the war on Iraq resolution?

Was Crowley quoting the actual question? There’s no way to tell from this report. But according to Crowley, Kerry said he still would have favored the resolution if he knew then what he knows now. But in the next day’s Washington Post, Jim VandeHei improved on that framing:

VANDEHEI (8/10/04): Responding to President Bush's challenge to clarify his position, Sen. John F. Kerry said Monday that he still would have voted to authorize the war in Iraq even if he had known then that U.S. and allied forces would not find weapons of mass destruction.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sorry, everybody....Geeeeez!!
I thought it was an interesting discussion.

A lot of times, in campaigns, things happen, & only later do we realize how important that event was.

They were not saying the vote was good or bad, & they were not saying who would win the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it's a bit early to be composing epitaphs.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC