Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analysis: McCain’s Bailout Gamble Looks Like a Bad Roll (CQ)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:33 PM
Original message
Analysis: McCain’s Bailout Gamble Looks Like a Bad Roll (CQ)
Analysis: McCain’s Bailout Gamble Looks Like a Bad Roll
By Jonathan Allen, CQ Staff

After rolling the dice by personally indentifying himself with a $700 billion Wall Street bailout proposal last week, it appears Republican presidential nominee John McCain crapped out early Monday afternoon when the House of Representatives rejected the bill by a vote of 205-228.

Republicans insisted that McCain’s well-publicized involvement had led to improvements in the legislation and built backing among Republican members behind a bill that no one wanted to have to vote for.

But despite a McCain intervention in the process that was dramatic — or melodramatic, as some critics describe it — only 65 House Republicans voted for the measure. The figure fell far short of the number that House Republican leaders had promised to deliver to ensure wide bipartisan support.

Nearly every member of the nation’s political leadership owns a share of the blame for crafting a bailout that did not assuage enough lawmakers’ concerns to pass. But McCain invested more political capital than anyone else in a deal that went bad.

McCain announced last Wednesday that he was suspending his campaign and called on President Bush to convene a White House meeting with him, Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama and congressional leaders of both parties to put some muscle behind the legislation. At the same time, McCain called for last Friday’s scheduled first debate between himself and Obama to be postponed, though he later back off that position.

Democrats accused McCain of politicizing what Bush had described as a national emergency by adding the pressure of the presidential campaign to the tenuous bailout plan negotiations. Republicans countered that McCain gave a needed push to a measure that had no visible support in their caucus.

Had the House and Senate passed the bill, the legislative success would have had 1,000 mothers and fathers, including Bush; Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson; House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , a California Democrat; Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank , a Democrat from Massachusetts; Minority Leader John A. Boehner , an Ohio Republican; and Obama, who said he worked the phones to abet the process. But McCain’s high profile might have especially earned him much-needed plaudits after his campaign slipped from a slim lead in some polls following the Republican convention to trailing Obama by several percentage points in most polls.

But after the bailout bill fell apart, McCain was left with little room to argue he had helped the process. So, he fired a few partisan shots.

<SNIP>

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002966228
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm starting to dislike McCain *very* intensely.
What a worthless piece of crap he is. I can't stand anything about him any more. In 2000 I actually kind of liked the guy, but now! My God, he's a total putz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC