Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Best intro sentence to an MSM political analysis this year:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:24 AM
Original message
Best intro sentence to an MSM political analysis this year:
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 09:26 AM by PaulHo
Op-Ed Columnist
When Madmen Reign
comments (62)
Sign In to E-Mail or Save This
Print
Share
Linkedin
Digg
Facebook
Mixx
Yahoo! Buzz
Permalink

>>>>I’m not holding my breath, but I would like to see the self-proclaimed conservative, small government, anti-regulation, free-market zealots step up and take responsibility for wrecking the American economy and bringing about the worst financial crisis since the Depression.>>>>>


Bob Herbert in today's NY Times. Obama and Co. should read and reread this commentary in it's entirety. Herbert has a rare gift of getting to the ideological heart of a problem. He's 'in his glory,' today... as my grandmother would have said.

Added observation: In the next debate ( It's about the economy, no?) I'd tie Phil Graham around McCain's neck like Archie Bunker's proverbial "albacross". Not just his neck; around both arms, legs and any other part of McCain's anatomy to which he may be tie-able.

( Apologies for the fact that the column ran earlier ... perhaps last nite.... on DU; but it deserves anbother go-round, imo)


By BOB HERBERT
Published: September 29, 2008
Madness.

Skip to next paragraph

Bob Herbert

Go to Columnist Page » Readers' Comments
Share your thoughts on this op-ed column.
Post a Comment »
Read All Comments (62) »
I’m not holding my breath, but I would like to see the self-proclaimed conservative, small government, anti-regulation, free-market zealots step up and take responsibility for wrecking the American economy and bringing about the worst financial crisis since the Depression.

Even now, with the house on fire, the most extreme among them won’t pick up the fire hoses and try to put it out.

With the fate of the Bush administration’s desperate $700 billion bailout of the financial industry hanging in the balance, Representative Darrell Issa, a Republican from California, stuck to his political playbook like a man covered in Krazy Glue. He pronounced himself “resolute” in his opposition to the bailout because to be otherwise would amount to a betrayal of party principles.

To deviate from those principles, in Mr. Issa’s view, would be like placing “a coffin on top of Ronald Reagan’s coffin.”

We are in very strange territory here.

George H.W. Bush warned us about “voodoo economics” in 1980, but the ideologues clamped a gag on him and put him on the Gipper’s ticket. For much of the time since then, the madmen of the right have carried the day. They were freed of their remaining few restraints with the ascendance of George W. Bush in 2000.

These were the reckless clowns who led us into the foolish multitrillion-dollar debacle in Iraq and who crafted tax policies that enormously benefited millionaires and billionaires while at the same time ran up staggering amounts of government debt. This is the crowd that contributed mightily to the greatest disparities in wealth in the U.S. since the gilded age.

This was the crowd that cut the cords of corporate and financial regulations and in myriad other ways gleefully hacked away at the best interests of the United States.

Now we’re looking into the abyss.

When President Bush went on television last week to drum up support for the bailout package, he looked almost dazed, like someone who’d just climbed out of an auto wreck.

“Our entire economy is in danger,” he said.

He should have said that he, along with his irresponsible Republican colleagues and their running buddies in the corporate and financial sectors, put the entire economy in danger. John McCain and his economic main man, Phil (“this is a mental recession”) Gramm, were right there running with them.

Credit markets have frozen almost solid, banks are toppling like dominoes and brokerage houses are vanishing like props in a magic act. And who was one of the paramount leaders of the manic anti-regulatory charge that led to this sorry state of affairs? None other than Mr. Gramm himself, a former chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.

Where is Mr. Gramm now? Would you believe that he’s the vice chairman of UBS Securities, the investment banking arm of the Swiss bank UBS? Of course you would. A New York Times article last spring noted that the “elite private bankers” of UBS “built a lucrative business in recent years by discreetly tending the fortunes of American millionaires and billionaires.”

Toadying to the rich while sabotaging the interests of working people was always Mr. Gramm’s specialty. He was considered a likely choice to be treasury secretary in a McCain administration until he made his impolitic “mental recession” comment. He also said the U.S. was a “nation of whiners.”

The tone-deaf remarks in the midst of severe economic hard times undermined Senator McCain’s convoluted efforts to reinvent himself as some kind of populist. But they were wholly in keeping with the economic worldview of conservative Republicans.

The inescapable disconnect between rhetoric and reality is often stark. Senator McCain has been ranting recently about the excessive pay and “bloated golden parachutes” of failed corporate executives. And yet one of his closest advisers on economic matters is Carly Fiorina, who was forced out as chief executive of Hewlett-Packard. Her golden parachute was an estimated $42 million.

Voters have to shoulder a great deal of the blame for the economic mess the country is in. Too many were willing, for whatever reasons, to support politicians who spat in the eye of economic common sense. Now the voodoo that permeated conservative economic policies for so many years has come back to haunt us big-time.

The question voters should be asking John McCain is whether he has stopped serving his party’s economic Kool-Aid, which has taken such a toll on working families, and is ready to change his ways. Is his sudden populist transformation the real thing or just a mirage?

In the gale force winds of a full-fledged economic hurricane, it’s fair to ask Senator McCain whether he still considers himself a conservative, small government, anti-regulation, free-market zealot. Or whether he’s seen the light.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texanshatingbush Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Link to original article???? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Here, O yee of little faith:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30herbert.html?hp

I couldn't paste it before... dunno why. Also it may not accesssible to some who don't subsrcibe. For a while NYT was limiting 'full access ' to subscribers. Don't know it that's still in effect. Don't THINK so.

Enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanshatingbush Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Thanks, PaulHo.......
I have plenty of faith in what you write, but I also like to have "chapter and verse" in case I need to throw this information into the face of my lunatic fringe brother!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION
The name MUST stick.

This isn't another Great Depression or the Greatest Depression or any othername, we must get te media to start callin it THE REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION because that's what it IS.

REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION REPUBLICAN DEPRESSION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. you're absolutely right!
I wish I could K&R an individual post (although I like the OP too, of course!).

You should contact the Obama campaign with this, just to make sure someone there gets the idea. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Herbert really slides the knife deep into Republican hypocrisy... worthy reading...
... and Obama needs to incorporate this article into his stump speeches ASAP, and hit it hard in the next Presidential Debate with McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. The party of "personal responsibility"
never takes any personal responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Anyway you can clean your post up and take out the unnecessary bits?
other than that its a good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sorry, Carpenter. I had to go out and times's up. But....
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 10:35 AM by PaulHo
...you should be able to read the original article at the link in reply #4.

If that doesn't work, go www.nytimes.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why do people always blame the voters?
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 10:57 AM by Stevepol
From the OpEd: "Voters have to shoulder a great deal of the blame for the economic mess the country is in."

If we had a democracy, you could rightly blame the voters, but we don't have a democracy and haven't had one at least since 2002.

Bush was not elected in 2000; he wasn't elected in 04.

Are the voters to blame for voting mostly for Gore and Kerry?

The voters can't control the corruption of our election system by voting machines and illegal tactics that are never confronted by those in power.

I blame the Dem leaders and other leaders who had it in their power to confront the criminals and scream bloody murder at them for their outright CRIMES against the American people. To this day they fail even to recognize that the voting machines are a serious problem with our election system. If they miss such an obvious fact, how can they be expected to challenge or confront the more nuanced dirty tricks that are sure to be used in 08?

How can the American people be blamed for voting for Gore and Kerry?

If Rove and his gang again succeeds in stealing the election again, every pundit will immediately scream that the American people are idiots. But I fail to see how the American people should be blamed for outright fraud and crime over which they have no control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemeupwhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hi PaulHo.
Please be aware that DU copyright rules require that excerpts of copyrighted material be limited to four paragraphs and must include a link to the original source.

Best,
wakemeupwhenitsover
DU Mod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC