Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: If you designed an economic rescue bill, what would it look like ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:19 AM
Original message
Poll question: Poll: If you designed an economic rescue bill, what would it look like ?
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 10:20 AM by steve2470
I've put some options in this poll, but by all means, provide your own. I realized last night that the first bill was fatally flawed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spritz57 Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. All of the above depending on the wording of the amendments. Make it
a democratic bill and pass it on for signature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. FDR in the last depression put Americans to work, I thing it work today
as well. Instead of Nafta and Cafta, the outsourcing and insourcing, Corp tax breaks to leave nation, etc. are eliminated today or ASAP. All this would cover the cost of this Bailout. The system is working as expected but it has so many holes in it, plug them up and put the American citizen back to work and it will fix itself once again, stablized itself, just as it did in the days of Franklen D. Roosevelt, FDR.

Give us our jobs back, our respect back and limit the globization that brought us to this situation, this economic crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maui9002 Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Different issue
I agree that an economic growth plan should be adopted around one principle; get people into good paying jobs. And I'd spend hundreds of billions (even if we have to borrow even more) to rebuild infrastructure (roads, highways, bridges, and other public works); to pursue energy independence (subsidize alternative fuel vehicles, build more power plants, including nuclear and coal fired plants, and build wind and solar projects); and fund innovation bigtime. That being said, that's more long term strategy that can be handled by a new Democratic President and a Congress controlled by the Democrats. Right now, we need an economic stabilization plan to ease a looming liquidity crisis, which could devastate our economy. What we need is a huge injection of confidence, and voting against the bailout plan send exactly the wrong message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Equity stake in the bailed out banks is a must. Otherwise, they
have no skin in the game. None. They can just walk away from the bad debts they dumped on us.

It worked very well for the Swedes. It must be a part of what we do, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maui9002 Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. See Section 113(b) of bailout bill
which provides for exactly what you're asking. Admittedly, the devil is in the details, and there's a ton of authority given to the Secretary of the Treasury in this regard, but it's in there. The US government is to receive either preferred stock warrants or debt securities in the financial institutions it supports with taxpayers dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't want debt securities in the banks. I'll take the warrants.
But I want someone other than 1 guy (Paulson) pulling the trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maui9002 Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Obviously, one man won't make all the decisions
but the Secretary of the Treasury will ultimately be responsible. And it will be interesting to see if Barack Obama would retain Paulsen as Secretary. If not the Secretary of the Treasury, then who would you suggest be responsible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maui9002 Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Other than bankrupty changes (and of course "other")
I believe the bill covers everything you've included in the poll. Some are not detailed yet; for instance, the bill calls for a report by the Secretary re current regulation of the financial markets to be given to Congress by April 2009 (see Section 105(a) of bailout bill); assuming we'll have a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress at that time, that's a better time to be overhauling the financial regulatory than now anyway. And bill does provide authority for mortgage relief as to mortgages that are purchased and managed by the Treasury (see Sections 109 and 110).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Give every US citizen over 18 an equal share of the $700 billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maui9002 Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. That would be a handout that would be foolish
Heck, why stop at $700B? Why not give everyone a million dollars? The misunderstanding of the current crisis is remarkable; it's a shame our leaders have been unable to do a better job of explaining what is at stake and what needs to done and why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ready for some lunacy?
First, my bailout would occur in stages. I'd buy all the debt on homestead property first. Then, any borrower in homestead property that's at prime plus 4% or more would get an immediate 2-4% rate cut on their monthly mortgage payment. That's called breathing room. I'm still making money and at the same time putting cash in the pockets of the people I was hired to take care of.

I'd then take any defaulted loans and freeze any pending litigation on them. I'd issue a tender offer to them to reinstate their loan, forgive the arrears and move forward if they Stipulate to Final Judgment. I might lose, what, $10k at that instant, but if the loan performs, I'll easily make that back in a year or so.

Etc, etc.

In time, I'd look at my loans that default anyway. I'd have a team pull the HUDs on them in each area. If I found a trend amongst mortgage brokers, lenders, title agents or anyone else involved, I'd prosecute them and file claims against any insurance coverage they have.

My bailout plan would not include any car nor credit card debt.

I'd also put into place legislation for the future that involved salary and options regulations for the heads of financial orgs. I'd create an incentive program for lenders that keep their loans performing, thereby instituting a much stronger default resolution ideology.

Lastly, bye bye MERS. Hated you from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. I voted other.
Reverse all deregulation policies of the past 30 years, reclaim the stolen goods and return them to the rightful owners (the money didn't disappear into thin air, somebody has it), eat those responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's a fiduciary rescue bill
To rescue the banks, the circulation of money. We aren't considering a bill to address the "fundamentals" of our economy right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Bernie Sanders Plan plus this:
1. Replace Treasury Secretary Paulson with a an alternative executor confirmed by a 50% + 1 in both houses.

2. Provide some sort of business or action plan outlining where and reasons money will be allocated and such actions expected outcome. Give the American people a stake in understanding the purpose of the funds.

3. Investigate all instance of white collar crime as far back as a decade leading up to this and exact appropriate criminal charges.


Bernie Sanders outline:

http://sanders.senate.gov/petitions/?petition=Financial_Crisis_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC