How DARE Pataki imply Democrats wouldn't defend the US

[Sparkly]

against terrorism.

BUSH *IGNORED* the problem of terrorism in favor of ICBMs when he took office, yet Pataki blames Clinton?! Clinton fought Republicans in Congress EVERY step of the way, and the Republicans claimed he was "wagging the dog" re: bin Laden!!!

And he then DARES imply that Democrats wouldn't have fought back after 9/11????

This is DISGUSTING.

[madmax]

1. What is wrong with his voice...

The inflections and cadence doesn't sound like him.

And forget about the bullshit - I need hip boots. :puke:

[wurzel]

2. Franks implied the same thing.

[Sparkly]

6. I didn't even know Franks spoke

I haven't been watching. Just thought I should watch tonight but I'm not sure I can get through it.

I get SOOO mad. :mad:

[wurzel]

12. Looking for Powell's spot I suppose.

[slojim240]

17. What were FDR and Truman? Dog meat?

Republicans only start wars, they do not fight them.

[A_Possum]

3. They're overplaying their hand

I think they're under the delusion that the Anne Coulter approach is gonna work.

************

"Bush did business with Bin Laden's bankers while Kerry...was fighting to shut it down to terrorist and drug connections."

"Long before September 11, 2001, George W. Bush got a 25 million dollar loan from the same bankers that dealt with bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, while John Kerry was fighting to stop this bank's global laundering of money for drug lords and terrorists. John Kerry shut it down. He's been fighting terrorism at its roots since before George Bush ran for office."

[whistle]

4. There should be a single Pataki speech thread here....

...I'm getting dizzy

[Texas_Dem]

5. They are going to turn down the lights,

are going to turn down the lights,and try to scare the American people with Bogey-man stories and how those Democrats can't keep the monsters out from under the bed or closet.

[gulfcoastliberal]

7. Loathsome douchebag

like ALL repugs.

Dems should never, ever trust them again. Period.

[kerryin2004]

8. of course dems wouldn't..

Don't you know dems are the weak chickenhawk party while repukes always are the first to step up and serve their country.. Bush and Cheney are real combat heroes, who know how to defend a country because they are just so tough.. I mean Kerry can fire an m=16 but when he does flowers come out of it.. When Bush fires his gun, real bullets come out..Him and Cheney are real manly men, tough on them terrorist..

[cal04]

9. pataki is disgusting as Juliass is

and what I find more disgusting is this is all for their own political gains and someone should point that out. This is a disgusting display to all the families of 911.

[blm]

10. A Democrat would have read the Hart-Rudman report on global terror

when it was given to him in Jan. 2001.

[Protected]

11. They've gone nuts

9/11 was a horrible failure. The fact that they're now saying "re-elect us because 9/11 happened on our watch" is the sickest and most fucked up piece of politics I'll hopefully ever see.

[Sparkly]

13. Exactly, they act like 9/11 was an accomplishment

They practically CELEBRATE it.

[spanone]

14. uTTERLY fUCKING sHAMELESS. sHAMELESS.

[Bullshot]

15. It was real manly of him to say he and Kerry never debated in college.

And tonight, he's going to end that by laying out the facts on Kerry and Bush. His perspectives and nobody else's.

Brilliant! About as charismatic as your speaking ability.

[sparrowhawk]

16. Liberal Democratic Presidents won both World Wars ...

of course Democrats can defend the country AT LEAST as well as Republicans.