so:"if we know where he is, we need to take him out" bad; "i know how to get him, i'll get him" good

[unblock]

mclame's criticisms of obama smacked of desperation.
really, this is a desperate, losing campaign that had nothing to attack obama with but decided they needed to attack obama so they invented some crap out of necessity.

obama's position is, if we know where he is, and it's in pakistan and pakistan won't help us get him, then we need to take him out ourselves.

according to mclame, that's announcing an invasion :wtf: and telegraphing a military move, all very bad and naive and all that.

but mclame's position is i know how to get him and i'll get him. now, presumably, this means, uh, if we know where he is, and it's in pakistan, and pakistan won't help us get him, then, ..., uh, ... we need to take him out.

so mclame is basically saying that providing that tiny little bit of extra clarity is some horrible mistake. :eyes:


or are we to believe that mclame would PROTECT BIN LADEN in such a case?