Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Troops asked to waive right to a secret ballot- this is scary!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:46 AM
Original message
US Troops asked to waive right to a secret ballot- this is scary!
Please note that the links of the company to handle military votes to the Republican party.

Members of the military will be allowed to vote this year by faxing or e-mailing their ballots - after waiving their right to a secret ballot. Beyond this fundamentally undemocratic requirement, the Electronic Transmission Service, as it's known, has far too many problems to make it reliable, starting with the political partisanship of the contractor running it. The Defense Department is making matters worse by withholding basic information about the service, and should suspend it immediately.

The Defense Department is encouraging soldiers to use absentee ballots or fax votes directly to local officials, when possible. But it also provides an alternative: Omega Technologies, a private contractor, will accept soldiers' faxed and e-mailed ballots on a toll-free line, and then send them to the appropriate local elections office. Handling ballots is always sensitive, but especially so when, as in this program, they are not secret. An obvious concern is that votes for a particular candidate could be reported lost in transit, or altered.

Omega Technologies is not an acceptable choice to run the program. Its chief executive, Patricia Williams, has donated $6,600 in this election cycle to the National Republican Congressional Committee, and serves on the committee's Business Advisory Council. And while everything about the conduct of elections should be open to public scrutiny, Omega is far too secretive. In an interview, Ms. Williams refused to say who would handle military votes, and whether they could engage in partisan politics. "I will not allow the public to invade the privacy of the employees of Omega," she said.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/03/opinion/03fri2.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's it
I'm writing a letter to Senator Warner today. This should not be allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. They're privatizing the vote...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes and the Republican operative who is the CEO
of the company could very easily alter those votes. There is NO SECURITY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. if i were military dude i would be more concerned
with harrassment or demotion or whatever if i wanted to vote for kerry. supression of freedom of choice in vote. forget losing my vote, that would be the least of my concern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. No way can this be allowed! These people are nuts!

How much lower can the GOP sink?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. How telling.
"I will not allow the public to invade the privacy of the employees of Omega," she said.

She should have just truthfully come out and said, "I will not allow the public to have any right to know a thing about our machinations against them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A_Possum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Welp, that's the end of the line
I never thought I'd live to see it. Our entire democracy down the tubes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oly Donating Member (214 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Appears that state voting laws would be broken and the
ballots would be spoiled and not counted. I don't think the idea is real. I guess they want some dem to object to the idea and paint the guy as undemocratic and unpatriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. My letter to the Chairman of the Armed Forces Committee
Dear Senator Warner:

I was reading today in the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/03/opinion/03fri2.html) that the Defense Department is allowing the option for soldiers to vote without having secret ballots. Although the option for absentee ballots still remains I think even having this option for an open ballot is a bad idea. The chief executive of the company that handles it, Omega Technologies, is Patricia Williams, who has donated $6,600 in this election cycle to the National Republican Congressional Committee. I don't think this is an appropriate company to handle ballots that are open.

If anyone deserves to vote, and to have that vote counted confidentially, it is our soldiers. Let them have a say in whether they wish to return their elected officials to office, or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good job demnan
I am writing also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. Who you voting for there corporal, seaman, airman, private
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. You're either with us or against us
yeah that'll help guys buck the peer pressure of choosing Kerry over Bushler. NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. The fix is in
No other way to look at it.

Lick Laura's Bush - Drop Bush Not Bombs! - FUCK BUSH
http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. Kick
If this happens Democracy will take a step backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. They are afraid soldiers in Iraq will vote for Kerry
because they want to come home.

rosebud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC