Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton beat Poppy w/out 500,000 protesting and without an Iraq war mess.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 12:58 PM
Original message
Clinton beat Poppy w/out 500,000 protesting and without an Iraq war mess.
So, if Clinton beat Poppy Bush without 500,000 protesting Poppy's Administration and without a disasterous war going on, how can Kerry be down 11 points?

Answer: He's not.

The polls are counting "likely voters" and this means that the following groups aren't counted:

-newly registered of any age
-newly 18 & registered
-anyone who didn't vote in the last election because they didn't care Bush or Gore

That means a LOT of Democratic voters are NOT being counted in these polls.

And remember, the CHALLENGER gets the motivated voters (ones who want to see a CHANGE) and the incumbent has a hard time getting the same motivation to vote going for him.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ross Perot. Major factor in 1992 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Clinton wins even without Perot
Perot got 18% of the vote, but in election polls (who would you have voted if perot wasn't running) it was split with a good 8-10% of Perot voters saying they would've stayed home had perot not run. The popular vote would've been something like 51-49 Clinton but he would've scored a comfortable win electorally. States like Cali, Oregon, Washington, Pennsylvania, NY, Ark, Missouri, Illinois, would've not flipped to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. We could argue this one 'til the cows come home
Edited on Sat Sep-04-04 02:03 PM by depakote_kid
the fact is, both sides would have used different strategies without Perot in the race. The dynamics would have been completely different. Whether Clinton could have withstood the full onslaught of the Republican smear machine on his own- and whether he could have succesfully furthered his agenda in the absence of Perot- is very much an open question.

Personally, I'm inclined to think he may have lost- but I only base that on anecdotes of my conversations with Perot supporters and my general perception of that wierd voting block. I haven't seen any really compelling evidence either way that accounts for enough of the variables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That's why we've got to help get Roy Moore on the Ballot!!
Ole 10 Commandments would draw off the far religious right - who are not particularly pleased as a group that Junya has not managed to over turn Roe, put the bible at the top of every child's reading list (replacing My Pet Goat) and put all of the atheists, lesbians, feminists, secular humanists, gays, abortionists and public school teachers in concentration camps where we can make consumer goods for 15 cents a day and bring jobs back to Muurika.

We need Roy. He's not likely to win, but we need him on the ballot.

Pcat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Isn't it a little late for that?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPAgainstGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. BS - Perot got ZERO Electoral Votes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have more to add..
note how these polls are oversampling GOP voters and undersampling Dem voters. If you poll 300 Democrats and 400 Republicans, of coure you're going to find the Republican candidate way ahead.. silly..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was reading up that election last night
and Bush Sr. wasn't really liked by the media that much either. they did alot of positive reporting about Clinton. Bush Sr. was/is just a snippy old man.

Now this Bush is much different than his dad and I think that's why the GOP likes him so much more. How can a man start an illegal war on lies, run up the largest deficeit in history of our nation, have a dismal job record, forget the environment, have a crook for a VP, be illiterate unless using the teleprompter, ignore terror reports, botch up education, be a racist against a certain group of people who want the same rights under the constitution, etc., and STILL be ahead in the polls? I. Just. Don't. Get it.:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Gore won the popular vote and would've won FL without the steal
and Dubya was seriously propped up by the press in 2000, even more so than now I think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. America is afraid
Unlike with poppy Bush, America is afraid of terrorist attacks and Bush uses the lack of major terrorist attack since 9-11 to claim he has and will protect America. Many Americans seen way to willing to abandon critical evaluation for the protective image Bush is trying to portray. Clinton ran on the idea that its the economy and poppy Bush was out of touch, Bush is running on the idea that its terrorism and Kerry is out of touch. Kerry must turn the table and show in concrete examaples how Bush has not acted to protect Americans and how his foreign policy is devestating to the war on terrorism. Kerry also has to provide evidence he can do better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. But with Perot
Of which Nader is the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I'm not sure Nader will siphon off that many voters this time around.
People have wised up. Not all have, but most.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton and Perot beat Poppy.
And, he beat Dole because of a booming economy and because Dole was about as exciting as oatmeal.

Kerry's pussyfooting around Iraq and the alleged "war on terror" isn't working. Hopefully he will come to his senses and start attacking Bush where he is most vulnerable instead of offering nothing but the DLC "not as bad" formula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A_Possum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. And it doesn't count me...
I was a Texas voter last time. Now I'm in NEW MEXICO, and my vote COUNTS.

Mwhahahaha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC