Rasmussen has bounce almost gone - Bush 47.6 to Kerry 46.4

[MikeG]

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Presidential_Tracking_Poll.htm

[MikeG]

1. kick

[Cobalt Violet]

2. Good ! A few ads and debates and we'll be on top!

:bounce:this!

[BillZBubb]

3. Hard to believe I'm saying this, but Rasmussen is right

Usually they slant Repug, but their post-RNC numbers have been much more reasonable than the others.

[Got WMD]

4. 1pt lead for W!!!

Something tells me this won't be included on the scroll for all the networks and cable news channels. But I do remember repugs siting the Rasmussen poll in early August when the "major" national polls showed a 5-10pt lead for JK.

[MikeG]

5. Freepers are starting to worry

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1207903/posts

[59millionmorons]

11. Strange

The strange thing is that they sound exactly like us at DU when we see a poll we don't like. It's the pollster, there cheating, there a left/right leaning pollster. etc

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

13. Yes, I have noticed that about the response to polls on both sites. n/t

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

6. When you see a positive DU thread-- You Must KICK IT

:kick:

[senseandsensibility]

7. For those of you that follow polls closely

I've heard that the Time and Newsweek polls used flawed methodology. Are those flaws missing from Rasmussen?

[ruggerson]

8. Yep

Matter of fact, on his pay site, Rasmussen commented that he thought the Time poll was severely flawed - overweighted to Republicans

[A_Possum]

12. Time poll was simply ridiculous

They had this weird thing where when the phone was answered, they FIRST asked for the youngest male in the household, and if there wasn't a male, they asked for the oldest female. This was touted as some kind of random choice or something, but I'm durned if I can see how any kind of twisted statistical excuse can make that random.

[MrBenchley]

9. If you had a nickel for every instance Time was utter bullshit

you'd be able to buy your own Dick Cheney....

[Digit]

10. That is more like it!