|
As we have learned, George W. Bush is the master of low expectations. His handlers have manipulated reality to such a point that he is presumed to have succeeded or done well or been the victor as long as he isn't reduced to the bumbling, flummoxed, brain-damaged idiot that we know he is.
This will once again play itself out during the next series of debates. As much as we may try to take solace in the fact that John Kerry is truly more presidential, more authoritative, that he is light-years ahead of Bush in the areas of eloquence and cerebral power, the truth is that if he is not careful, he will find himself in the same no-win, frustrating ambush that Al Gore found himself in 4 years ago.
I think much of the reason for this is the simple structure of the debates. They are genteel, processed, media whitewashed events - all of which works to Bush's advantage. Four years have passed and I think we've learned about this man who would call himself president. In the structured environment of scripts and rehearsed Q&A's, he can certainly hold his own. But we've all seen the pile of half-thoughts and dim-witted expressions he is reduced to when he is confronted with the need to speak extemporaneously. And more importantly, we have seen that when confronted with unexpected skepticism and criticism he is quite capable to blowing his top, and these are the moments when he is his worst.
Undoubtedly, during the practice sessions leading up the debates, Bush will be exposed to many of the usual attacks on his record - the economy, jobs, Iraq, the state of health care, maybe even OBL. When John Kerry brings these points up, Georgie boy will seem unflustered and the media will laud his excellent debating style.
As I see it, John Kerry's task is to push George W. Bush's buttons. Actually, I think he only needs to do it a couple of times to completely unravel the idiot king. Unfortunately, this might require that he "breaks from tradition", the tradition of debates as we know them. That is one factor which the Bushies can't account for...the off-the-wall, unexpected charges and/or accusations. It's risky - the possibility of alienating the voting public is there, but in my opinion it is the only way to defeat George W. Bush in the upcoming debates.
I've been vague regarding these "off-the-wall" subjects, but here on DU we've seen and heard them all...many of them seem to warrant further attention and consideration. Where there's smoke...
|