Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When would you bring out the My Pet Goat TV ads?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:36 PM
Original message
When would you bring out the My Pet Goat TV ads?
You know what I'm talking about. The ads that would show pictures of Bush listening to those kids in Sarasota read to him after Andy Card told him both towers were burning. The ads that show him frozen up while the clock ticks 7 minutes down and while people are jumping from the buildings.

Kerry can't be anywhere near them, of course. But one of our groups should have that ad locked and loaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. They should be out now
to show Bush as the liar he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Nope, October
We don't want to give the smear team time to come up with excuses, do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. NOW AND OCTOBER
Why wait? Pound the hell out of the media with those ads day in and day out through 11/2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. The documentary, F911 was good enough for me.
The professional presentation had serious impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Every night at 6pm. Right after a Bush commerical. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd bring them out in mid-October.
So that there's enough time for discussion to percolate through the culture. I really think very few Americans have seen this footage, despite its being the center of Fahrenheit 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. They will never do it.
I'm afraid that they are not aggressive enough to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. How about right after
the ad that shows Cheney testifying before a congressional committee and listing all trhe weapons systems he wants to cut or eliminate.

And how about right after the Bush Flip-Flop ad that has clips of Bush saying the war on terror is winnable, then it's unwinnable, then the next day it's winnable again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Last week in October.
Don't give them any time before the election to trot out the "he was weighing his options" or "gathering his thoughts" baloney.

I'd run them in every state where the polls showed +/- 4 percentage point or less differences.

I would also include a short preamble to the ad, where you see the back of Shrub's head, and an aide says, Mr. President, the CIA says that "Osama Bin Ladin is determined to strike inside the US soon. He will hijack airplanes and attack other targets. What do you want to do?" Then fade into the school room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I agree
This is a strong visceral attack. It must be done in the two weeks before the election - enough time to make sure it sinks in, and close enough to maintain its impact.

I'm afraid it would lose its impact if it ran for more than 2 weeks, and it would give Rove time to counter attack. Fewer than two weeks, it wouldn't have the same impact.

Personally, I'd prefer a split screen of Bush with the WTC in the other half of the scree, and a timeclock to empahsize these events are happening at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yep, the split screen is definitely the way to do the classroom.
The clock has to be done in such a way as to emphasize that seven minutes is a long time. I'm not sure how to convey that in a 30 second, or even a 60 second spot. I'm sure some good ad designers could do it.

I also like the idea on sounds from NYC in the background. No talking, except when Bush* is told we are under attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Like the LBJ "girl picking flowers" ad
That I was too young to remember, but have read was incredibly powerful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Daisy Girl
It only ran one time on one of the national networks. But the other networks picked it up and did stories about, just like what happened with the Swift Boat Liars' ad.

Daisy Girl showed a small girl in a field picking off the petals of a flower and counting. The screen suddenly freezes and you hear a military-type voice starting a countdown. When it gets to zero there is a nuclear detonation. And then you hear LBJ talking about peace,etc. He never mentions Goldwater.

But Goldwater went nuts and demanded equal time from the networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I would be very concerned about shots of the WTC
Edited on Sun Sep-05-04 04:37 PM by Spinzonner
People might focus on and relive their horror at that and not focus on Bush and the message. It's distracting.

And some other people might find it exploitive and crass and find it offensive. You might lose some people at the same time you're trying to get them.

The focus should be on Bush himself. People know what was happening and don't need to have it shoved at their faces again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Exactly
I think something like that would work, though I agree with a poster below about showing the WTC. The ad has to hit hard at Bush's perceived strength, which is the handling of 9-11. He's been able to wrap himself up in that flag -- and Kerry needs to take it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe I'm overstating this
. . . but I think if this ad gets run, Bush wouldn't survive. It's more incendiary than five Willie Hortons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. The image of Bush* sitting there frozen and in shock
Is incredibly powerful. Anyone who has ever seen someone frozen with fear will immediately recognize the look. Military people will know it.

To me it was the most damning moment in F911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. And it isn't a petty attack
This goes straight to the heart of his competence to be president in an age of terror and in the age when weapons of mass destruction are available and proliferating quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Agreed, so this is one "negative" piece I support
Endless possibilities for voice-over sarcasm:

"The decisive leader of the free world sat motionless for 7 minutes, in the biggest crisis this nation faced since Pearl Harbor. Would YOU sit motionless for 7 minutes?"

The spot needs to run very late in October. All our ammo this year has been frontloaded to the spring and early summer, and therefore wasted. Fahrenheit 9/11 obviously had much more ability to depict time lapse than a 30 second to 1 minute commercial. But you probably need at least 15 seconds of soundless footage, focused squarely on our great leader and his clueless expression.

Of course, we will be assailed for exploiting 9/11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nikatnyte Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Even if they do run such an ad
the die-hard repugs will have some sort of rationale for Smirky's behavior. We've heard it already -- "He was formulating a response." "He was waiting for more information to become available." My favorite -- "He didn't want to frighten the children." Of course, anyone with any kind of a brain could see that for what it was -- a scared idiot suddenly realizing he was in over his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The visual impact of a good commercial
Would just override any explanation (oops, rationalization...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. The trouble with that explanation is

that he had already heard that the first tower had been hit. Did he just wipe that fact from his mind and have to start over mentally ?

And somehow the fact that he claimed to have seen the first plane hit needs to be introduced while no video of that was available until much later. It's goes to the credibility of statements and excuses they have made about his behavior at that time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Those sound idiotic, though.
Everybody has been in an emergency situation in their lives. Very few of us freeze up to that degree. We should expect better of our presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
32. They shoul close the ad
with "just trying to get out of harms way"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goondogger Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don't forget
the ad that shows * saying: OBL - wanted dead or alive, then later, "I don't know where he is and I don't care."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. They shouldn't. What they should have done from the very beginning
is place ads that would show what a liar bush is. They should have labeled HIM the flip-flopper instead of the other way around. People already know about "My Pet Goat" and they don't care. Especially when the repukes can counter with an ad featuring Teresa saying, nobody can say what was going on in the president's mind. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Teresa can't speak for Bush. He's supposed to spring into action like
any "decisive" leader would do. And it's not like he can say there was no previous info on who it might be.

"My Pet Goat" punches a hole in Chimpy's "I'm in charge" image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. People who've seen f-911 know about it
I can't tell you how many people I run into who have to have it explained to them and still don't believe me afterward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. But a lot of those people who say they don't care
haven't seen the actual footage. And the excuse "I didn't want to scare the children" won't cut it when faced with the sight of him literally paralyzed by fright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. I'd rather see it on the Daily Show...in mid-October
Edited on Sun Sep-05-04 11:29 PM by RevCheesehead
"an obvious pandering to get out the Goat Vote"
"the sheep are fearful"
"sacrifices still to come"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. to be followed with the sequel: My Pet Scape-Goat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curtis Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. Funny I was just talking about this today
with my wife, Nellie. Here's my idea.

Start off with Bush saying that the only time he would would touch Social Security would be in the event of recession, war, or a national emergency.
Show the split screen
Zoom to the side with the people jumping from the towers
Have a voice over of Bush saying "Lucky me--I hit the trifecta!" (doesn't even have to be Bush but a sound alike or even just the words as reported in the media)
Then cut to the towers collapsing with the voice over asking, "can we afford for Bush to get lucky again?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. What the ad should include:
First, a timeline-->
It should be noted in the timeline the fact that he knew of the first plane crash before going into the classroom.
It should then be noted of when and what Card tells Bush.
It should then note how Bush sat there for 7 minutes and did nothing.
Then, it should show evidence that Bush went from the classroom to a 20-minute photo-op - all while knowing that the nation was under attack.

Next, the visual and audio portion of the commercial-->
At the beginning, we should see and hear the words: "George Bush. Was he really that strong a leader on the day of September 11th?"
It should show Bush sitting in the classroom for the entire commercial.
In a corner of the screen, newspaper and periodical quotations and titles can be shown as citation for the timeline's details, which are being narrated at the same time.
At the end, the screen of the commercial should fade to black; during this blackout, we should hear the voices of television anchors asking throughout the day, "Where is the President?" "We still haven't heard from the President?"

If we were to do this commercial with 10 days left in the campaign, we'd win. I'm that confident of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC