Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Clean Step" tax simplification: retort to Flat Tax nonsense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:26 AM
Original message
"Clean Step" tax simplification: retort to Flat Tax nonsense
Edited on Mon Sep-06-04 01:38 AM by oscar111
Sure, simplify taxes. But not by using bushes outrageous flat tax.

Our method could be called "Clean Step".

Step, because we keep the progressive step-wise increase on higher incomes.

Clean, because we would SIMPLIFY by removing the thousands of cluttering adjustments to taxes. Like the deductions, and rebates, exemptions,... and i dont recall half of them.

Currently the IRS booklet is both laughable and insane.
===========================
Idea #2 -->
BEYOND CLEAN STEP -- NO STEP TILL AT HIGH INCOMES { "High Clean Step"}

Personally, i would get all taxes from the top 10 % , as i read it was done before WW2. This year, did not Gen. Wes Clark propose shifting ALL tax from the middle to the upper class?

So this is both a mainstream idea because it HAS been done, and because it has been revived by Gen. Clark.
=====================

Recap of the first, main idea here:
When bush says "Flat Tax", we can reply, "No, we want "Clean Step taxes"."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're just looking at the portion of the tax code...
... that affects you. 95% of the tax code is composed of special exemptions and credits for business.

Want to really simplify the tax code? Go back to 1948's code. Period. But, watch out for the high-volume squawking from the business community and the wealthy. 80% war profiteering tax, no gimmes from the government for offshoring costs, 92% nominal rate on the top income brackets, but they could shelter income in capital gains, but would pay 48% capital gains tax on short-term investments. They'd be going for long-term investment in a heartbeat.

It would throw `em into a tizzy. Ain't gonna happen, though.

Nice to contemplate, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC