Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's how things stand with the debates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 12:59 PM
Original message
Here's how things stand with the debates
From the US Commission on Presidential debates web site:

Presidential debate:
Thursday, September, 30, 2004, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL (Fox)
Friday, October 8, 2004, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (ABC)
Wednesday, October 13, 2004, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ (NBC)

Vice presidential debate:
Tuesday, October 5, 2004, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

Each debate will last for ninety minutes, start at 9:00 p.m. ET, and take place before a live audience...Each debate will have a different single moderator to be selected by the CPD...no later than September 10.

Format:
The candidates will be seated at a table with the moderator in the first and third presidential debates and in the vice presidential debate. The second presidential debate will use the town meeting format in which undecided voters, selected by the Gallup Organization, will question the candidates.

Pool coverage for the third presidential debate has not yet been determined.


So what's the good and bad news here? Should Kerry allowed Bush to "neotigate" any further terms? And would it be a good idea for Kerry to commit to showing up and proceeding without Bush if he doesn't?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry should demand a traditional stand-up debate
Bush is very weak and he falls apart after standing for more than about twenty minutes... he becomes confused and hunches over the podium clutching onto it for support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mailman82 Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. No Surrender
No more terms>>>>>No Surrender>>>> No Prisoners!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. plus 10:30pm est is way past shrubs bedtime..
someone's going to be a little cranky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. No more negotiation.
Edited on Mon Sep-06-04 01:06 PM by NightOwwl
And Kerry should show up alone if Bush the coward refuses to appear.

ETA: Now I understand why he's trying to get out of at least 1 debate. Troublemaker is right, he doesn't want to use the podium because it makes him look even more cowardly than usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeekingTruth Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. One thing...
Edwards should not sit at at able with Cheney. It will make him look like the son at the table with the father in a serious type kitchen table conversation.

Edwards needs to be up on his feet so he can use his better body language. Remember, most tells in language come from body language and not verbal language.

I can't believe the Kerry campaign would go for this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. I don't believe anything's been "negotiated" yet
Edited on Mon Sep-06-04 01:28 PM by rocknation
I believe these are just the parameters that the commission has laid out. I don't think Kerry should request to change anything unless Bush does.

This is exactly the kind of discussion I was hoping for. Thanks, and keep it coming!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, Kerry should show up even if AWOL doesn't.
I don't particularly like Fox moderating the 1st debate.....it will be interesting to see what questions are pitched to Kerry and Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Make Crashcart stand for 90 minutes...
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush will show
One of the reasons the incumbent party gets to have their convention last is that they also wind up in the driver's seat running up to the debates, meaning they hold the negotiating cards, not us. We need the debates more than they do, but there's no chance in hell Bush could get away with not debating at all. He would get absolutely hammered if he didn't show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Unfortunately, I think Bush could get away with refusing to debate.
His apologists let him get away with everything else, why should this be any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
11.  Pundits will not quip that Chimpy is AWOL from the debates? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveable liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. kerry should charge ahead
Kerry should have nothing to fear. I expect bush* to give the same tired responses to every question.

example:

Q: mr president*, how do you expect to create jobs in a second term?

A: Lemme exsshhplain...you see...in order to create jobs, you have to have a plan. Jobs are what you get after hard work, so if you want a job, which i create, working hard is the best way...to...to get one.

It'll be 90 minutes of hilarity and weeping, knowing this guy has a chance....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. The First Debate Is Fox , Guess Hume will be Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. If the prisoners at Abu Ghraib
were made to stand for hours at a time, the candidates for president can at least stand for 90 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally343434 Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It was days at a time
Our glorious war-criminal troops made them stand (or roped them up) for days at a time, not hours.

The live-audience thing is silly, and it will just become another WWF circus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. certified GOP attack dog
I can just see Cal Thomas, Krauthammer, and Barnes asking the questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. That is pool coverage
not moderators...

that means they do the camera work.

The moderators are: Jim Lehrer& Bob Schiefer for the sit downs.

Charlie Gibson for town Hall.

And Gwen Ifill for Veep debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Thanks--the names of the moderators weren't on the site
I guess Fox will be shooting Kerry at the most unattractive angles.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Three Presidential debates and one VP debate
Edited on Mon Sep-06-04 01:28 PM by WilliamPitt
Is the same, more, or less than 2000? I can't immediately recall.

P.S. In 2000, Bush could run as a giddy outsider. He didn't really have a relevant record to run against on foreign policy issues, having been a Constitutionally-weak governor. Now, he has a record, and he is going to run away from it as fast as he can.

Of course, however, Bush is going to kick Kerry's ass in the debates. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. Team Kerry should stay in campaign mode until the first debate...
...Take no time to "debate the debates". Dodge and avoid negotiations if possible.

Then show up as scheduled. Accept no "too busy" excuses. No doctor's excuse. No note from his mother.

The American people deserve to hear a public airing of the issues.
Not more GW campaign rhetoric and catchphrases.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. Really too bad to make Edwards sit down
He's used to presenting argument with verbal and non-verbal skills, in fact he's REALLY good at it. Making him stay seated gives Cheney's flat, dead pan delivery a better spin.

I wonder if Edwards can get up and move around when he's speaking?

Richard Ray - Jackson Hole, WY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. Allow time for candidates to question each other
You don't see that much anymore, but I like a format that allows candidates to question and answer each other -- can you imagine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Doubtful bu$h will go for the town-hall format,
as you know, the bu$h team is already talking about limiting the debates to just two. So guess which format would suffer? Doubtful that Rove will let him off the leash to answer questions to which he would ramble, dissemble, and not know the answers to. Of course, if it's a gallop audience, then Rove will know the questions before-hand. Edwards will have to sit, due to the strain on cheney's heart (one could ask, "what heart").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Bush loves the town-hall format...
as long as everyone in attendance has signed a loyalty oath. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lagniappe Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. No loyalty oaths for the debates. The Dems really need to
use that as a talking point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. standing up or sitting down...
who cares...I want to hear Kerry embarrass BushCo like he did with O'Neill back in 71...I believe that this will be BushCo's downfall...

bring it on GOP fuckers...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kerry should crush bush in the second debate unless
Carl Rove can get people planted with scripted questions.
That would be the only way shruby can do well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. Monday kick
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. Kerry must insist on LINCOLN-DOUGLAS rounds in these debates.
Bush will only crumble under direct questioning by an opponent. Town hall meetings can be gamed (yes, they can, folks), and with rare exceptions, media questions are going to be too polite and inoffensive. Kerry MUST be given the opportunity to question Bush.

This must be a non-negotiable term. If I were in the Kerry camp, I would even sacrifice one of the debates to insist on having this.

-MR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kerry shouldn't negotiate with people who want to be dictators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lagniappe Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kerry needs to stand firm. No negotiations.
This is an issue we will win. We need to keep repeating that Bush wants Cheney to hold his hand and they want audience members to sign loyalty oaths.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I agree
He should show up at that third debate whether Bush shows up or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. I hope and trust that Kerry and Edwards will stand up!
Sitting behind table for 90 minutes is lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. Has * agreed? I heard he hasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
34. Bad news is that Gallup picks the "undecideds"
I bet they will fudge this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC