Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Todd and Sarah to testify under oath before AK personel board on Friday.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:01 PM
Original message
Todd and Sarah to testify under oath before AK personel board on Friday.
Reported on AC360 just now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not positive, but I THINK it's a deposition, so they will be
under oath and be questioned, but I don't think they're going to AK. to testify in person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Right.
They mentioned that also. They will be deposed, but not in AK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. A deposition is usually easier to go through. Not nearly as many people are there,
and nobody has to put on a show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gee Sarah, What you going to wear???
So many new outfits to choose from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. darn it! ya beat me to it! lol NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't this the board that the Governor can fire at will? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The Board is,
but the attorney handling the matter is very good, and he's a Democrat. He has already been provided with Branchflower's report and the 1,000 pages or so of confidential information that he had. My guess is this investigation will be an affirmation of the first one.

Mudflats -- http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/troopergate-i-shares-documents-with-troopegate-ii/


Think of it as a changing of the guard. The first Troopergate investigation (the one from the Alaska Legislature) has concluded, finding that although Palin was within her legal rights to fire Walt Monegan, the Commissioner of Public Safety, she DID abuse her power and violate the state’s ethics code.

The new guard is another investigation, prompted by Palin herself, from the Personnel Board. Presumably Palin went to the extraordinary lengths of filing an ethics complaint against herself because she felt that the Personnel Board would be a friendlier investigative body. This may or may not be so. Crackerjack Anchorage prosecutor (and Democrat) Tim Petumenos has been hired by the board as the special investigator.

Petumenos has asked the Legislative Council to turn over the confidential information from their special investigator, Stephen Branchflower. The Legislative Council made public a 263-page tome with the snappy title: “Report of the Investigation of the Circumstances Surrounding the Termination of Former Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan and Potential Abuses of Power and/or Improper Actions by Members of Governor Sarah Palin’s Administration, Volume I, Public Report.” It’s Volume 2 we’re talking about.

Volume 2 makes Volume 1 look like a flimsy paperback, and contains information utilized to come to the conclusions that were stated in the public report. Everything in Volume 2, is not for public consumption. I didn’t even know they made binders that big.

So, meanwhile, the Personnel Board and its investigation, which operates out of the public eye, marches on. We don’t know when they will be finished, we don’t know when they will release the report, and we don’t know what the report will say. But every once in a while, like a surfacing whale, we catch a glimpse of this mysterious investigation, before it sinks out of sight again. And we wait.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. good info..
keep us posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sohndrsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but this is before people she appointed.
Which sort of defeats the purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. All three of the board members were holdovers appointed
Edited on Wed Oct-22-08 10:35 PM by Blue_In_AK
by her predecessor, Frank Murkowski. Only one of them has been "re-upped" by Sarah -- a guess they have overlapping term limits or something. It's a well known fact that she's not very popular with the "old guard" Republicans here, so it's not a given that they will be friendly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sohndrsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. well then, that's reassuring.... right? Why the idea of "conflict of
interest" doesn't enter into these things simply because of titular power is something I can't figure out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Can you imagine if Joe and Jill Biden were in this situation?
The 'librul' media would be eating their livers nightly while roasting their toes in a pit of fire. Instead:

:crickets:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. So has the McCain camp already put out the results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. This will be another opportunity (hopefully)
for some more good Alaskans to show what they're made of, like the legislative council did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC