Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Palin a diva? PUHLEEEZE!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:15 PM
Original message
Sarah Palin a diva? PUHLEEEZE!
Apparently, Campbell Brown has taken up the "that's sexism" banner on behalf of Palin, charging that to call her a diva is sexist and derogatory.

So, I wrote to CNN:

"Campbell Brown would do well to look beyond what the anonymous McCain advisor said to the true meaning of the word diva.

It was not meant to be used in a derogatory fashion before it was hijacked by hip hop linguists and turned into something dirty; a spoiled rotten brat girl with more money than talent who has no clas or manners.

Aretha Franklin is the epitome of the word diva. Greats like Ella Fitzgerald and Sarah Vaughn were divas. Sarah Palin does not deserve to be called a diva. She isn't even in the same league with true divas."

That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Diva?
She isnt even in the same league as Human!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the $900 shoe fits, wear it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Palin's own party lobbed the charge
We're just :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That is right. KO made sure to emphasize where the source was..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I was just helping Campbell with the definition.
Divas are awe inspiring women with class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Oh I know, I'm vicariously presenting it to Campbell
I mean, no kidding Repugs are sexist. But as Palin would say, "Quit whining!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. The "diva" seems to have forgotten all the expensive voice training.
Edited on Mon Oct-27-08 07:23 PM by BrklynLiberal
On the clip that KO played, she was back to that high-pitched, ear-piercing screeching...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captiosus Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Campbell Brown has been sticking up for Palin a lot in the last 2 weeks.
She's been playing the woman card and sexism card, too.

She completely took Palin's side when Palin's shopping spree with other people's money came to light. She invoked some bullshit that women have to look great to run and that she was justified in getting the clothes.

I ended up blasting Brown a lengthy e-mail:


"Dear Ms. Brown,
I recently read your recent commentary entitled "For women in public eye, looks matter" and, in all honesty, two things immediately came to my mind in response:

1: "Well, DUH!", and;
2: "I think you have completely missed the point."

Allow me to elaborate.

"Well, DUH!"
Anyone who has studied even the most basic of American Political History knows that looks matter, regardless of a candidate's gender. We've all been taught the lesson of Kennedy v. Nixon and how Nixon's appearance, as the campaign was the first WIDELY televised campaign, ultimately hurt him. Those of us who have been following this particular race have heard and read all about the juxtaposition regarding the elderly looks of McCain and the youthful looks of Obama, especially when they're on the same stage.

I don't think anyone would dispute that looks matter for Palin when she's in front of the national spotlight. However, this brings me to...

"I think you have completely missed the point."
The problem here is not that Palin got a makeover, rather the problem is how the makeover was funded.

Since the Palins have openly released their financial documents, we know that Sarah Palin earns a six figure salary as Governor of Alaska while her husband, Todd, earns nearly a six figure salary between his work with BP and his work as a commercial fisherman. They're certainly not "poor" folks.

If Sarah needed a new wardrobe, which she likely did, a public relations specialist from the McCain Campaign SHOULD have coordinated with the Palins to find appropriate attire which Sarah could afford within the Palins' budget.

Instead, they spent money that was donated to the Republican National Committee, money that should be going not only to the McCain/Palin ticket but also to other Republican national hopefuls, for her makeover. $150,000 on clothes. $23,000 on make up.

This speaks volumes about the character of Sarah Palin. She could have taken the incentive and bought a new wardrobe for herself but, instead, she used her new found position of prominence to get expensive items which she would have never been able to afford. Just as she used her position as Governor of Alaska to exert pressure on Commissoner Monegan, she used her position as Vice Presidential nominee to spend other people's money to live outside of her means.

That is why this is a big deal and has rightfully angered some donors."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Devo?
I love Devo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. There are other words to call Palin. Some have nastier connotations.
But, I think diva is best right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
childslibrarian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Awesome!
You rock!:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. There's another definition too
A diva can also be a high-maintenance person who is not worth the trouble. That seems to fit Moose Lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC