Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deficit Dubya and his low expectations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:45 PM
Original message
Deficit Dubya and his low expectations
W's deficit should be a primary point of criticism from here on out. He's bragging about his record and you can use his own evaluation of his record against him.

I mean, how can we protect the nation from terrorism if we're not going to be able to afford anything more than spitballs in a few years?

Check this quote out - 3/27/2001, Bush promised no deficit even with an early 90's like recession:
And we can proceed with tax relief without fear of budget deficits, even if the economy softens.  Projections for the surplus in my budget are cautious and conservative.  They already assume an economic slowdown in the year 2001.

Even if the slowdown were to turn into a recession similar to that of 1990 and '91, the Congressional Budget Office projects that the 10-year surplus would shrink by only 2 percent, from a little more than $5.6 trillion to a little less than $5.5 trillion

Each year, Bush has lowered the level of fiscal responsibility he expects from himself. In all four budgets the WH has submitted, predictions for surplus/deficit for 2003-2006 are included. These come from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/

In 2001, they predicted a $978 billion surplus, 2003-2006

In 2002, they predicted a $53 billion surplus, 2003-2006

In 2003, they predicted a $1.02 trillion deficit, 2003-2006

In 2004, they predicated a $1.8 trillion deficit, 2003-2006

"But," the independent voter thinks, "he can't be blamed - we have the deficit because of 9/11 and the accounting scandals, right?"

"Wrong!"

The word "terror" occurs a whopping 292 times in the 2003 budget and and goes through great pains to say the economic effect of the attacks are being considered. That was after the accounting scandals and stock market decline as well. In that budget, delivered February 2002, the White House predicted a measly $13 billion dollar deficit in 2004, and from there on out, we'd be into the black.

This administration cannot be trusted with our nation's finances. They have a record of four years of fiscal failure under their belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just imagine what's in store for us in the bush future
Because now bush isn't even bothering to paint a rosy picture using "facts and figures" anymore, he isn't nearly as "up beat" about any of this, he just implies thay we should just trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC