Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: "Bush likely to bow out of one debate"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:31 AM
Original message
MSNBC: "Bush likely to bow out of one debate"
Bush likely to bow out of one debate
Adviser cites concern over possible town meeting participants

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5926845/

President Bush may skip one of the three debates that have been proposed by the Commission on Presidential Debates and accepted by Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), Republican officials said yesterday. The officials said Bush's negotiating team plans to resist the middle debate, which was to be Oct. 8 in a town meeting format in the crucial state of Missouri.

Bush aides refused to discuss their opening position. Officials familiar with the issue said he plans to accept the commission's first debate, which is to focus on domestic policy, and the third one, which is to focus on foreign policy.

The audience for the second debate, to be at Washington University in St. Louis, was to be picked by the Gallup Organization. The commission said participants should be undecided voters from the St. Louis area. A presidential adviser said campaign officials were concerned that people could pose as undecided when they actually are partisans.

"It's not a fear of the format," said the adviser, who refused to be identified to avoid annoying Bush. "They want two debates that are focused on clear differences on foreign and domestic policy. We benefit from the differences."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bawk! bawk bawk bawk BAAA-AWK!
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 09:34 AM by Richardo
Chicken shit.

"But Uncle Dick! Non-handpicked audiences SCARE me!!"
"There, there little Nimrod, him won't have to face those mean mean pawtisans. Him's a LEADER!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Now we only need JK to say that on Good Morning America
Then I'd be very happy indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bwak Bwak Chickehawk
Kerry ought to go through with the debata and have a cardboard cutout of Bush there. The RW pundits would probably declare the Cardboard cutout the winner!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. COWARDS!!!!!
THEY ARE AFRAID TO FACE THE VOTERS!!!

Spread the meme, that's what they are, afraid of the voters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. He's democracy's staunchest defender - unless you dare to exercise it.
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 09:52 AM by Richardo
Chicken shit. Oh wait, I said that already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Come on W they were going to give written copies of questions
Geez talk about be scared, he can't RISK having someone ask anything about oh let's see

TANG
Illegal abortion
Failed Businesses
When he moved into the ranch
His fear of horses
His record (and records) as Governor
Lying us into a war
Politicizing 9/11 (including fund raising) over and over

That just a few off the top of my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Was a Kerry spokesperson contacted for this story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. The adviser refused to be identified -says it all
"It's not a fear of the format," said the adviser, who refused to be identified to avoid annoying Bush.

Fear, fear, fear. Everyone is afraid of this chicken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hope Kerry bows in and offers to do the second debate solo.
I am a little concerned about how these undecided voters will be chosen, though. Maybe it would be better to have voter questions written in and pulled at random.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Chicken George!
Doesn't trust the American people!

And so what if one or two "partisans" sneak into the Missouri town hall setting? Isn't Chicken George confident enough in his position (whatever it is this week) to answer a hostile question or two?

What if we agree to let Dick Cheney go and hold his hand again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. YESSSSS! Kerry should go to MO that night by himself
and proclaim that Bush's refusal to debate is an insult to the great state of MO. He should have an 8-hour town hall meeting--people can come and go as they please; heck, it could even move. This might bring MO in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaolinmonkey Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. I agree. Free airtime for Kerry, no rebuttal. These are presidential
debates and if he doesn't show up, tough shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Repubs can have someone fill in for him
maybe Alan Keyes, Orin Hatch, Pat Robertson, Gary Bauer, maybe a tickle-me-elmo or a furby, Rick Santorum perhaps, get someone good and crazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. Zell Miller? I'd love to see him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. They are afraid of the participants...
<snip>
The audience for the second debate, to be at Washington University in St. Louis, was to be picked by the Gallup Organization. The commission said participants should be undecided voters from the St. Louis area.

A presidential adviser said campaign officials were concerned that people could pose as undecided when they actually are partisans.
<sip>
Why are they worried?
This means they have not managed to get control of the selection process
Their problem is uncle Carl can't get the questions to these undecided voters so shrub will know the answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. "It's not a fear of the format," said the adviser,
who refused to be identified to avoid annoying Bush. "They want two debates that are focused on clear differences on foreign and domestic policy. We benefit from the differences."

If you're worried about annoying Bush, why speak to the press at all? And shouldn't you be working toward something that is MUTUALLY beneficial?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. I knew it...W stands for wuss, wimp, weasel...
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 09:46 AM by tandot
He is afraid of the debate. Is he afraid that he might mis-speak?

Bush: "Too many good terrorists are getting out of the business...Too many terrorists aren't able to practice their love with Americans all across the country." ... "and this is all the fault of John Kerry and all the trial lawyers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. Let me get this straight.....
Bush might back out of a debate that would expose him on National TV to VETTED question as spoken by "undecided" voters.


Is that right?

(The following is a Dem Talking point for all Kerry surrogates when asked to comment on this development)

Well, why should we expect anything different from a candidate that also would not fulfill his military commitment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. Concerned that they could pose as undecided ...
when they're really partisan -- like all those hecklers Kerry lets in to his rallies, you mean? The ones who pretend they're coming to listen to what he has to say, only to chant 'flip-flop' and disrupt?

Oh, yeah, I forgot -- they filter people out who aren't Republicans at the Dim Son's appearances.

Y'know, I think he probably would be better off with an audience of partisan Democrats than an audience of undecided voters, anyway. After all, they already know what a Democrat would ask him -- I think they're actually afraid of dealing with undecided voters because they don't know what undecided voters are using as a criterion for selection, and they might not have a talking point to beat them down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. It's like that famous question at one of Bush's recent appearances
Bush: Yes, you have a question?

Man: Well, it's not really, a question, I just want to THANK YOU...

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. I would bet my first born son.....
that is Kerry was doing this very same thing and not Bush the fucking media whores along with their repub friends would be saying.....IF HE CANNOT DEFEND HIMSELF IN FRONT OF REGULAR EVERY DAY PEOPLE AT A DEBATE THEN HOW CAN HE DEFEND US FROM ALL THE BAD PEOPLE IN THE WORLD?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. That headline's not nearly snappy enough. Let's tighten that baby up a bit
How about...

"Bush Likely to Flee Screaming From One Debate"

"Bush Likely to Collapse Into A Gibbering Mess If Ever Faced With A Hard Question On Live TV"

"Bush Likely to Bow Out of One Debate, Wishes He Could Bow Out of All Three"

"Bush Likely to Take Cheney Along With Him To All Debates"

This is just too funny.

C ya,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
22. Bush is afraid to answer questions from real people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. 'Bow Out', oh, that's just so precious!
Bow Out my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. OK, repeat after me (in singsong): Chic-ken! Pus-sy! Lo-ser!
Fuckhead! Dildo! Douchebag!

Etc.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
25. Kerry needs to offer to allow him to bring Cheney
If Kerry said something like:

"if it would make him feel more comfortable he can bring Dick Cheney along with him to help him answer the questions. That would be OK with me. In fact, if he thinks it might help him he can have Dick Cheney help him out at all of the debates. It doesn't matter to me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. Two words:
GIRLIE...MAN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
27. So let JK have the (free) 90 minutes to debate himself then.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
28. Be careful- Gallup picks the voters in the town hall forum debate?
With Gallup organizing the participants in the second debate, I have absolutely no faith that the "undecided voters" in a town hall format are going to be non-partisan. Kerry should be careful about insisting on this.

Here's what I'd like to see:

Kerry should grudgingly, reluctantly agree to forgo the town hall format in the second debate. In return, Kerry should ask for a third debate with a standard journalist panel. But Most importantly, Kerry should INSIST on a LINCOLN-DOUGLAS round in every debate.

-MR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. Kerry Can Handle Republican Partisans
Bush cannot handle Democratic partisans.

That's the difference between them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. George W. Bush: Putting the "Chicken" in "Chickenhawk"
This is such a juicy issue for Kerry. The responses nearly write themselves. I really like the idea of one of the posters above who said that Kerry should offer to let George bring Dick with him.

"I know that George W. Bush is not used to having to answer real questions from people who were not forced to sign loyalty oaths to him. It's understandable that George W. Bush would be afraid in a situation he's not familiar with. So I have no problem if he would like to bring Dick Cheney with him to help him answer some of the harder questions."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #28
43. Yes, it could be a sucker trap
and in certain things the Dems ALWAYS seem to fall into the obvious ploys. Give them nothing but the idea of a third debate per se is very important so long as it is not crafted for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. As ah-nuld would say, what a girlie man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
30. "BOW OUT" !!!!!
Slither out is more Like It! Freakin' Coward! What a guy to lead our Nation ..he can't even face a dissenter much less a terrorist!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
31. "We benefit from the differences."
They benefit from Nothing! Deluded mass murderers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
32. This is a huge issue and Kerry better not let them have their way.
The republicans ALWAYS dictate the particulars of presidential debates. Kerry had better hammer away on this one and EMBARASS THEM into debating in this town hall forum. If Bush outright refuses to answer questions from ORDINARY AMERICANS it should become a HUGE CAMPAIGN ISSUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. On this issue, Kerry needs to step on Junior's NECK.
He needs to call him out, he needs to embarrass him, he needs to hammer home this point to the American people: "President Bush is afraid to speak with you in the absence of a thorough pre-screening."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
34. How do we respond...
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 11:21 AM by neomonkey
This morning a pundit on MSNBC pointed out that President Clinton refused a 3rd debate in 1996. His point was that incumbents who lead in the polls would tend to avoid debates.

I'm afraid the Whiny Right may use this...I'm not sure of the circumstances between 1996 and this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. My only thought on Clinton in 1996
Clinton was elected by a majority of voters and the electoral college - Bush does not have a mandate from his last election - so I don't think he should get a pass on this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
37. That should read "chicken out". Bawk bawk bawk bawk. Bush doesn't
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 11:25 AM by yellowcanine
want to answer questions from U.S. citizens who haven't signed a loyalty oath to him. They must be terra-ists if they aren't loyal to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
40. What pisses me off about this
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 11:27 AM by gatorboy
is it's obvious he doesn't want to talk abut the issues. I mean seriously, how long is each debate? How can you go into serious detail on what you want to do with the country in two little debates. The Bush people are fixated on the quick sound bytes and not the issues. We will probably hear 'fuzzy math' crap and 'out of the mainstream' that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. They're just trying to set him up as "reasonable" and "brave"
when he gives in and agrees to a format he's "uncomfortable" with. They've been playing this game since Texas and we need to stop falling for it. Call them on the low expectations game, tell them to cut the crap and just agree to it like they eventually plan to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
42. SURELY!
This would turn some undecideds against him. SURELY! I mean Good LORD, this makes the man look downright pathetic, scared and a chicken shit girlie man.

Dems, NOT KERRY, need to jump all over this.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC