Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why The Newsweek and Time Polls Scared Me

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:20 AM
Original message
Why The Newsweek and Time Polls Scared Me
Not because I believed them, but because I knew they were bullshit, but somehow Rove got Time and Newsweek to run w/ them and got the media establishment to follow along and report them uncritically and ad nauseum. It's a frightening flexing of muscle if you think about it. If you doubted how much power they wield over the media, this little episode should put that notion to rest.

My worst fear has to do with the electronic voting machines. Time and Newsweek polls can provide significant cover for a theft of epic proportions using these machines. It's a scary thought and means we have to fight all that much harder, and we will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. My biggest concern was how many people might believe them.
The PERCEPTION that the election is moving out of reach (combined with the unfortunate timing of the Kerry campaign "shake up") is almost as deadly as actually BEING behind.

Too many people who intend to vote for Kerry EXPECT Bush to win. Those types of voters don't always show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northstar Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I disagree with your statement
Too many people who intend to vote for Kerry EXPECT Bush to win. Those types of voters don't always show up.

That's exactly WHY they will show up. If the public thinks it's 'gonna be a close one', they're gonna get out there and vote and help make a difference.

Remember, the 'margin' in Florida 2000 was around 500 votes, it made a WHOLE lotta people realize that THEIR VOTE - every one of them needs to be cast. I don't know about you, but I haven't heard anyone saying this time around that 'my vote won't make a difference' like we all used to hear.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. You don't seem to disagree at all.
"If the public thinks it's 'gonna be a close one', they're gonna get out there and vote and help make a difference."

Right! And a poll or two showing an 11pt lead for an incumbent President tends to eat away at that thought. They start to think "It ain't gonna be close".

Polls that correctly show a 4-5 point lead will do exactly what you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Well, I'm Sure That Was The Intended Effect
It seemed to coincide with a concerted push of the "Kerry is collapsing/in dissarray" story...It remains to be seen how effective it will be, though it seems to me that it was NOT very effective and Kerry weathered it well...it could very easily backfire and motivate the other side as another poster on-thread noted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. In a way they may help us
I think it has fired up the ground troops, who will not accept defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Hopefully!
I think Kerry weathered it well...

It's just a frightening illustration of the amount of unchecked power the other side has...To coordinate a couple of big polls to coincide with their push of "Kerry is collapsing and in dissarray!" story right after their convention...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Zogby himself explained how they used 31% Democrat methodology
when the last 2 Presidentials were 39% Democrat!

Using the same numbers, Zogby gets 46 for Bush, 44 for Kerry, when you use the proper 39% Dem.

Plus with all the registration and the uptick in the youth vote for Kerry due to the draft, we could go over 40% for Dems this year.

So work hard, be happy, don't worry.

Plus polls taken during last 2 weeks of August and over Labor Day are more conservative because workers are on vacation and away from their phones!

Look at the polls in a week or two to get a real sense. By the way the Rasmussen tracking poll had the race tied at 47.3% yesterday!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Zogby link here
http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews859.html

Newsweek is the same publication that denied that "Anonymous" was written by Joe Klein. Flatly denied it. Their bias predates Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. As the election nears, their power abuse is becoming more frightening --
I agree completely with you. There are two levels to be aware of here, I think. One, there is an election, with an issue for some of us of abuse of power, and fear that another four years could possibly bring an end to our system as we've known it. The other level is abuse of power used to manipulate and control the electoral process itself. In my most fearful and pessimistic moments, I find myself convinced that they will not give up the power they've achieved -- that they will hold on to it whatever it takes.

Control of the media, in particular, is reaching a crisis point. To cite an example that could be seen as frivolous, but really is not -- Kitty Kelley, a frequent guest on Larry King's CNN show, will apparently not appear in connection with her Bush book. Can there be any doubt about who/what is behind blocking her appearance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yup
Precisely why it's frightening...It really illustrates how much unchecked power they can wield and how organized they are...Somehow they got Time and Newsweek to release these obviously skewed polls and they coordinated it w/ a push of "Kerry is collapsing and in dissarray!" stories...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a new day Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Rasmussen provides data to both Time and Newsweek
Rasmussen interpreted the data is a very different way, never giving more that a 4.5 lead:

Date....Bush.Kerry
Today. 47.3 47.3
Sept 6 47.6 46.5
Sept 5 47.6 46.4
Sept 4 49.1 44.7
Sept 3 49.0 45
Sept 2 49.0 45
Sept 1 47.0 47
Aug 31 47.0 46
Aug 30 47.0 46
Aug 29 48.0 45



http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/090804W.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. even my local NPR
I was so angry that they just aired these polls uncritically and even had the pollsters on the show. They didn't say a word about their skewed sample.

As it was a call-in show, I went outside with my cell phone and notes from Rasmussen, who set the record straight on the oversampling, and called and called, trying to get on. Sorry to say I was met with a constant busy signal and never got on the show.

It just occurred to me, though, to e-mail the host and ask him to air this additional information. I think I will include your post about this, beetwasher. It is an appalling display of their power over the media.


Cher

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Cool! Please do!
Email and use my post if you wish, that is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nadienne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. This does not necessarily mean that Time and Newsweek
had their arms twisted. The Corporate Media and the Bush Administration probably are corraborating. They certainly seem to be looking out for each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. There Was Without A Doubt (to me anyway) SOME Type Of Coordination
between Time and Newsweek and the Bush campaign...The whole post convention, pro-Bush/"Kerry's collapsing" push was just too damn tidy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That's true -- I think some in the media are pressured and/or coerced...
and others, particularly at the corporate level, are all too happy to do what they can to insure a Bush victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Kick!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. just for the record
I sent the email to my local public radio (WNYC) and yes, I did use your post in it.


Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC