Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Early Voting and Polls in Swing States: A Sea of Blue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 06:24 PM
Original message
Early Voting and Polls in Swing States: A Sea of Blue
With more than 20 million Americans having already voted as of October 30th (more than 16% of the 2004 total), and very large percents of the total voting population having voted in certain critical swing states, there is a good indication that Obama is doing very well. This analysis looks at selected swing states, including Colorado, Florida, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia.

Assuming that Obama hangs on to New Mexico and the other states that either Kerry or Gore won, including Iowa, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire, all which are currently polling for Obama with double digit or nearly double digit leads, Obama needs just one additional of the above states to win the election.

Early voting information for the purpose of this analysis is taken from The United States Election Project – 2008 Early Voting Statistics.

Keep in mind a couple of things: First, the early voting statistics are not compiled according to whom people have actually voted for, although in most of these states the statistics are compiled by party affiliation. In assessing Party affiliation, the absolute percents of who voted from which party are not what is most important. Rather, it is the percents of who voted from which party relative to the voter composition of the state and recent polling information. For example, if a state is composed of 40% Democratic voters and 60% Republican voters, and yet during the time that it exhibited that composition was polling about even for Obama and McCain, that means that if 50% of the early voters are Democrats that would be a very good sign for Obama, because it would mean that Democrats are performing above what is predicted by their state composition.

Secondly, although the early voting statistics are not exit polls, regular “pre-election” polls taken after early voting has commenced may be considered at to be at least partially exit polls. That is because polls taken after early voting has started will obviously include some people who have already voted, roughly in proportion to the percentage of voters who have voted early.


Colorado

As of October 30th, the number of Coloradoans who have voted early already account for 60% of the total 2004 Colorado vote (Only 48% of Coloradoans voted early in 2004).

Broken down by Party, 38.6% or Colorado’s early voters have been Democrats, compared to 36.7% Republicans. That may not seem like much of a difference. But keep in mind that Colorado has been a Republican state. Even though Democrats demonstrated four times the increase in registered voters between January and September 30th, 2008, by the end of September, registered Republicans still outnumbered registered Democrats by nearly 5%, and by October 22nd they still outnumbered Democrats by 1.1%.

And despite that, Obama has been outpolling McCain in Colorado by an average of 6.5% in the last week of October. Furthermore, you can see from the graph (scroll down a little) that Obama’s lead over McCain has been increasing steadily throughout October.

Colorado summary: Early voting and current polling trends both favor Obama in Colorado. Since more than 60% of Coloradoans have already voted (judging by 2004 figures), current polls are more like exit polls than they are like pre-election polls.


Florida

The number of Floridians who have voted early so far account for 44% of the total 2004 Florida vote (compared to only 36% of Floridian voters who voted early in 2004).

By Party, 45.6% of early voters have been Democrats, compared to 38.2% who have been Republicans. That means that Democratic early voters in Florida outnumber Republican early voters by 19% (45.6% divided by 38.2%). Statewide, voters who are registered Democratic outnumber those who are registered Republican by 16%, as of October 6th. So Democrats are slightly outperforming Republicans in early voting in Florida, compared to their statewide composition.

Obama has risen in the polls from about even with McCain at the beginning of October to a lead of 3.5% in an average of 8 polls over the past week or so.

Florida summary: As in Colorado, early voting and current polling trends favor Obama in Florida. Since about 44% of Floridians have already voted (judging by 2004 figures), current polls are similar to exit polls to a significant extent.


Nevada

Clark County accounted for 66% of Nevada’s votes in 2004, and it was the only county in Nevada that voted for John Kerry, giving him a margin of about 5%. As of October 13th, 2008, there were 43% more registered Democrats in Clark County than registered Republicans. But among early voters, there were 73% more registered Democrats in Clark County than registered Republicans (52.5% Democrats, 30.4% Republicans). And 63.5% of Clark County voters (using 2004 as a standard) had already voted as of October 30th, 2008.

Obama has risen in the polls from about even with McCain at the beginning of October to a lead of 7% in an average of 6 polls over the past week or so.

Nevada summary: In Clark County, by far Nevada’s largest county, early voting favors Democrats substantially, compared to the voter composition of the county. Polling trends in Nevada as a whole also favor Obama substantially. Since almost two thirds of Clark County voters have already voted, and Clark County accounts for almost two thirds of Nevada’s voters, current Nevada polls are as much or more like exit polls as they are like pre-election polls.


New Mexico

New Mexicans who have already voted in 2008 account for 55% of the 2004 New Mexican vote.

By Party, there were 64% more registered Democrats who voted early than Republicans who voted early, as of October 30th (53.9% to 32.8%). That compares with a statewide excess of Democrats in New Mexico of 57%.

Polling in New Mexico has not been as prolific as in other swing states, but still, Obama appears to holding about a 7 point lead, with a 10 point lead in the only recent poll.

New Mexico summary: As in Colorado, Florida, and Nevada, both early voting and polling trends favor Obama in New Mexico. Also, as in those other states, recent polls in New Mexico largely represent exit polls.


North Carolina

North Carolinians who have already voted in 2008 account for 58.5% of the 2004 North Carolina vote.

By Party, there were 78% more registered Democrats who voted early than Republicans who voted early, as of October 30th (52.6% to 29.6%). That compares with a statewide excess of Democrats in North Carolina of 40%.

Obama has risen in the polls from about even with McCain at the beginning of October to a lead of 2.6% in an average of 7 polls over the past week or so.

North Carolina summary: As in all the other states discussed so far, both early voting and polling trends favor Obama in North Carolina. Also, as in those other states, recent polls in North Carolina are more similar to exit polls than to pre-election polls, since nearly 60% of North Carolinians have already voted (using 2004 numbers as a standard).


Ohio

Cuyahoga and Franklin Counties are two of the most populous counties in Ohio, together accounting for 21% of the state’s votes in 2004. They were also the two states that gave John Kerry his greatest vote margins in 2004, with 67% and 54% of their vote, respectively. And they were also the only two counties in Ohio whose early voting statistics are recorded, whose early voters in 2008 accounted for more than 30% of the 2004 county vote (Early voters accounted for only 8% and 12% of the total in 2004). Early voting statistics are not presented by party affiliation in Ohio.

Obama has risen from about even with McCain at the beginning of October to almost a 6 point lead in an average of 9 polls in the past week.

Ohio summary: Although early voting statistics are not presented by county in Ohio, the two counties that gave John Kerry his largest pluralities in 2004 are the ones that have exhibited the highest rate of early voting so far. Polling trends also strongly favor Obama over the past month. Current polling in those counties reflects exit polls to a substantial extent, since about 30% of their population have already voted.


Virginia

There is a paucity of early voting statistics for Virginia, compared to the other states discussed in this post. The only information presented is that early voters from Fairfax County in 2008 have accounted for 17% of the 2004 Fairfax County vote, compared to 10.5% early voters from Fairfax County in 2004. Fairfax County accounted for John Kerry’s second largest vote margin over George W. Bush in 2004.

Obama has risen from about even with McCain at the end of September to a 6.5 point lead in an average of 8 polls in the past week.


Overall summary of early voting in critical swing states

The critical swing states noted in this post all have a great deal in common:

1) They all voted for George W. Bush in 2004, and except for New Mexico they also all voted for Bush in 2000 as well.

2) Any one of them will give Obama an Electoral College victory on Election Day if he holds onto the states that Kerry won in 2004, plus New Mexico.

3) Early voting has accounted for 45% or more of the total 2004 vote in all these states except Ohio and Virginia.

4) Early voting has already exceeded the 2004 vote percentage in all the states except possibly Virginia, for which comparative data is not available.

5) Democrats are over-represented among early voters in each state, compared to their composition of the electorate for the whole state – except possibly for Virginia and Ohio, for which Party breakdown in not available (and in Ohio, the relatively large early voting percentage in the two largest Democratic counties suggest that Democrats are over-represented in that state as well).

6) Obama has risen in the polls in all seven states from about even with McCain (except in Colorado and New Mexico) in late September or early October to a significant lead in the last week of October. Although the lead is not above the margin of error in all polls, the combined lead for all polls in the last week is above the margin of error in each state.

7) Obama’s rising poll numbers in each of these states has occurred in conjunction with relatively large increases in Democratic voter registration (except possibly in Ohio and Virginia, for which party affiliation is not officially recorded) and with large numbers of early voters, approaching 50% or more in every state except Ohio and Virginia.


What does this all mean?

The disproportionate percentage of registered Democrats among early voters, in all of these states with the possible exception of Virginia (and maybe Ohio), is very encouraging. It is of course possible that early voters are not representative of states’ voters as a whole. If that is the case, Election Day could see a relatively greater Republican turnout than what we’ve seen so far in early voting. But since so large a percentage of voters have already voted in these states, the comparative Republican turnout would have to be quite large to turn the election around in these states.

Polling trends in all of these states show substantial gains for Obama over the past month and substantial leads in all of them, above the margin of error when the polls of the past week are combined. Furthermore, compared to past years, a reversal of the trend large enough to change the results of the election will need to be quite large, since so many voters have already voted.

None of this should provide reason for complacency, of course. Neither our country nor the world can afford another four years of Republican rule, especially with Republicans like John McCain and Sarah Palin. That could literally mean the end of world civilization as we know it. And furthermore, it is very important to achieve the largest Obama and Congressional vote margin possible in order to get our country back on track.

But given the current situation, if John McCain was to somehow pull out a “victory”, that should certainly be considered very suspicious, so say the least, unless accompanied by a sudden large plunge in Obama’s poll numbers. It would be time to get the lawyers heavily involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. National poll of early voters shows Obama leading McCain 53% to 34%
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-10/29/content_10269774.htm

With the election half over in many critical swing states, McCain's going to have a lot to make up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyEmily25 Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. OHIO
Obama groundsman and women are hitting the streets hard in small town Ohio and pushing the early vote. Obamas campaign is run like a "well oiled machine" he has good advisor's that have spread the word to small towns all across Ohio, DON'T WAIT VOTE! I would suspect that whatever information is being given about early voting (what percentage) would be in the democrats favor, Republicans think that big (any) elections come easy, especially in Ohio, and therefore have no reason to make sure that they're vote is counted. Either they take the democratic process for granted or they don't really care that much. Voters who vote Early DO care that much because we know that this election is imperative to this nations survival! Thats why I have already voted and I hope any progressive would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's great to hear
I live in Maryland, where we don't have early voting. But I'm very much looking forward to election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Some Gallup
It looks like some of the early voters are due to actually increased turnout and some are people who would have voted anyway. In the Gallup numbers, the number of early voters went up by 14% while the number of people planning to vote early went down by 9%. That means about 1/3 of these early voters weren't planning to vote early. The other good news is that those that planned to vote actually did vote.

These numbers bode well.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Very nice -- Does Gallup break out any of its polling data by early voters vs. others?
That would be very interesting, especially in the swing states where lots of early voting has already occurred. It could indicate to what extent the surge in Obama's numbers in several swing states in the past month are due to early voting, and also help to indicate the depth of the hole that McCain will have to climb out of in the next few days. If it indicated, as the party affiliation numbers do, that early voting has heavily favored Obama in crucial swing states, that would strongly suggest that things are looker even bleaker for McCain than they appear to be now.

I used to subscribe to Gallup's polling, but my house partially burned down and I lost access to my computer for several months -- the one on which I had paid for my subscription. I don't suppose that the information you presented here is publicly available?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's incredible that nearly 60% of 2004 voters have EARLY VOTED in NC this year!! - OMFG
It's a number that just blows your mind in some interesting ways.

60% (SIXTY) of North Carolians HAVE ALREADY VOTED - Holy Moley!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Absolutely -- and consider what that means
Polls showing Obama with the lead there are much more significant than polls from previous years. Given Obama's 2.5% lead, that means that only 40% of the voting population are left to make up the difference in the next 4 days. So, instead of having to switch by 2.5%, there needs to be a switch of more like 6%, in order to make up the difference.

Here's excerpts from an article that mentions North Carolina:

New trends are emerging, say two election experts we spoke with.

In North Carolina, traditionally republican, registered democrats have turned out two to one. “We’re seeing African Americans, which is unusual because they generally turn out election day, not early voting,”...

As a result of North Carolina election laws -- 100,000 people not previously on the voter rolls have been able to register and vote the same day.

http://www.khon2.com/home/ticker/33678754.html

And those 100,000 people weren't captured in previous polls, but they are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowledgeispwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. It's up to 66% now with Friday's numbers included.
66% of the total number of 2004 voters have already voted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. That's terrific
There will be no great voting delays in NC on Election Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Figures FL only at 44% lower than others, problem is lots of registered Dems who don't necessarily
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 07:30 AM by demo dutch
vote Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. That is true, but
Dems have participated in early voting out of proportion to their composition in the general electorate. Whereas not all Florida Democrats will vote for Obama, certainly party affiliation is a strong predictor of who they will vote for -- i.e. Dems are much more likely to vote for Obama than are Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm worried about the states that don't have early voting.
That on Tuesday they'll be overwhelmed and have logistic and legal problems.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Me too
But one good thing is that many of the critical states are covered.

Something tells me, though, that McCain is planning on stealing Pennsylvania. I hope that the Obama campaign has a damn good plan for preventing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. K/R ... Very good read, T4C
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thank you phrig
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. Interesting and important info
Thankyou. I hope all DUers read this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Thank you -- Here's an article that gives this some historical perspective:
http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-10-23-voa48.cfm

Officials in early voting states are reporting record turnouts...Democrats are voting early in greater numbers in Ohio, North Carolina, Iowa, Nevada and New Mexico.

This year's early voting is trending very different from past elections. We are seeing an early voter electorate that tends to tip a little bit towards the Democrats and also towards African Americans... This looks to be an early vote that will favor Obama. And what is significant about this is that usually the early vote favors the Republicans... The trends toward Democrats are unprecedented in some places.

This year things are very different... African Americans in Georgia are voting at an almost 10 percent higher rate than they have in previous elections. Democrats in North Carolina are more than double the rate that they were just four years ago. In Franklin County, Ohio, which is where Ohio State University is, the numbers are shocking. Nine-thousand Democrats have voted, 9,000 independents have voted and 900 Republicans have voted. Those numbers are just shocking.

Some election experts say that the record turnout for early voting could indicate that record numbers of American voters will likely turn out on November 4... We will have to go all the way back to 1908 to see the next highest turnout level...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC