New Talking Point: War Theorism (Bush) vs. War Realism (Kerry)

[JohnnyCougar]

One can go on and on about the "theories" of war drummed up by the * association. In their sense, it was a theoretical war. Remember Cheney saying the war would take "weeks not months" and we would be greeted with "rose petals?" Their war is based on theories beacuse THEY ARE ONLY WAR THEORISTS! They have never been to war, so they have NO IDEA what ACTUALLY happens in a war. Hence they are "War Theorists," ones who sat in armchairs fantasizing about war during Vietnam. The American public and the world have paid dearly for their theorizing. They have not been practical at all.

Kerry, on the other hand is a "War Realist." He has been to war, he has seen the logistics of trying to occupy a country, and he will not be fooled by fantasies and grandiose delusions when administering a foreign policy. He knows how to defend this country REALISTICALLY.

To differentiate Bush's FANTASY view of war from Kerry's REALISTIC view of war makes the Chimp look very, very weak and inept. And it makes Kerry look strong and steadfast.

Talk it up, people: "War Theorism" vs. "War Realism"