Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

help me out. looked for thread on TANG memo on MSWord?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:06 PM
Original message
help me out. looked for thread on TANG memo on MSWord?
what in the F*ck is going on here? how do we refute this? if it catches wind and isn't refuted fast....dammm...why can't Kerry's reaction team be this fast?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. i saw a pdf early. didn't bookmark it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here is one article on the memo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. thanks. I hope some more comes out and FAST
this is such bullsh!t. I can't believe how these bastards work the system morning, noon, and night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. These assholes started this shit
then emailed the thread all over the Internet.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210987/posts

And they talk about Democrats and "wild eyed conspiracy theories".


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, my. How can we possibly fight shear stupidity?
If all Bush did was miss a physical, I say God bless him.
Bush has proven himself a brave American President.

He knew the liberal press would tear his military records apart with their teeth, yet he boldly released them any way.

What a great man. What an honest man!

The more I learn about George Bush, the more I admire him.

Kerry, on the other hand, is a total coward. He hides his records in shame. He runs. He winces. I can imagine the horrors we'd find in those! Kerry is a small, small, weakling. He 's far from qualified for the Presidency.

If he's afraid to do something as simple as release his military records, imagine how he'd run and hide from a terrorist attack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Thanks. I'm on a diet.
And that just made me lose my appetite.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. This might help
The Selectric II had a Dual Pitch option to allow it to be switched (with a lever at the top left of the "carriage") between 10 and 12 characters per inch, whereas the Selectric I had one fixed "pitch".

The Selectric II had a lever (above the right platen knob) that would allow the platen to be turned freely but return to the same vertical line (for inserting such symbols as subscripts and superscripts), whereas the Selectric I did not.


As for the "theories" about the font:

Both Selectric I and Selectric II were available in standard, medium, and wide-carriage models and in various colors, including red and blue as well as traditional neutral colors, and both used the same typeballs, which were available in many fonts, including symbols for science and mathematics, OCR faces for scanning by computers, script, Old English, and more than a dozen ordinary alphabets.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Selectric_typewriter
---------


The world's most popular typewriter in 1972 was perfectly capable of creating superscripts.

BONUS: For a good laugh, click on this link to the Selectric Typewriter Museum (yes, there really is one. I think it's operated by a Democrat): http://www.selectric.org/selectric/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. LOL, they can't handle the traffic
site is down due to "excessive hits."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I saw that. pretty funny. they never thought they'd get slammed
by people eager to prove or disprove a point in presidential politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Oh, he's now refuting IBM
He previously had the page offline because of excessive hits from "conspiracy theorists" (his words).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mick Knox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Your source says
Sorry, but due to excessive hits, this page is temporarily out of service.

Please check back after the election.

For those who want my opinion...the documents appear to be done in Word, and then copied repeatedly to make them "fuzzy". They use features that were not available on office typewriters the 1970s, specifically the combination of proportional spacing with superscript font. The IBM Executive has proportional spacing, but used fixed type bars. The Selectric has changeable type elements, but fixed spacing (some models could be selected at 10 or 12 pitch, but that's all). The Selectric Composer was not an office typewriter, but apparently did use proportional spacing. These were very expensive machines, used by printing offices, not administrative offices.

At least my low opinion of TV news remains intact.


Great source that IBM Museum. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Actually
The source for my original post was wikipedia.org.

I just included the link to the "museum" because I found it googling and thought it was kind of funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think he meant FREEPER conspiracy theorists
Edited on Thu Sep-09-04 07:33 PM by bransonfu
never mind. this guy's an a$$hole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. excessive hits of crack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Freepers are clutching at straws. We frame this debate, the facts are
on our side, and the memos are real.

Let them lie, piss, and moan all they want - it's a done deal, Bu$h is AWOL. A DESERTER. Nothing can change that fact.

Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yep, and their side is on the defensive NOW.
Scrambling, trying to refute.

That's way I like it. Let THEM play defense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC