I mentioned this yesterday, but the more I think about it, the more I think it's an effective way to look at the forgeries issue.
July 9, 2003
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/08/sprj.irq.uranium/"A political firestorm is erupting in the U.S. over President Bush's assertion that Iraq sought to buy nuclear material from Africa.
"The White House has admitted that assertion -- made by Bush during the annual State of the Union address last January -- was based on faulty information.
"The chairman of the opposition Democratic Party is accusing the Bush administration of a cover up and senior Senate democrats are calling for a full investigation.
"The comments came after the White House released a statement admitting: 'We now know that documents alleging a transaction between Iraq and Niger had been forged.'"
*****
Shouldn't the media subject the Bush administration's use of forged documents to at least the same standard as they are subjecting CBS to? The firestorm over the
possible forged Killian documents seems to be greater than the firestorm over the documents that helped lead us into war. A closer look at that issue is warranted as long as the media is on the subject of forgeries.