Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forgeries? What about the forgeries that sent us into Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:11 AM
Original message
Forgeries? What about the forgeries that sent us into Iraq?
I mentioned this yesterday, but the more I think about it, the more I think it's an effective way to look at the forgeries issue.

July 9, 2003
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/08/sprj.irq.uranium/

"A political firestorm is erupting in the U.S. over President Bush's assertion that Iraq sought to buy nuclear material from Africa.

"The White House has admitted that assertion -- made by Bush during the annual State of the Union address last January -- was based on faulty information.

"The chairman of the opposition Democratic Party is accusing the Bush administration of a cover up and senior Senate democrats are calling for a full investigation.

"The comments came after the White House released a statement admitting: 'We now know that documents alleging a transaction between Iraq and Niger had been forged.'"

*****
Shouldn't the media subject the Bush administration's use of forged documents to at least the same standard as they are subjecting CBS to? The firestorm over the possible forged Killian documents seems to be greater than the firestorm over the documents that helped lead us into war. A closer look at that issue is warranted as long as the media is on the subject of forgeries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Going to War
using documents that you knew were forged to make your case, is a lot worse than some memos, someone may or may not have written 30+ years ago.

If the Bush misadministration wants to talk about forgery, bring 'em on.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There is no forgery - only the assertion of a "possibility" by GOP
GOP Assertion of "possibility" = truth as truth dies

At least in the US Media

War Hero is evil

AWOL is hero

Compassion = tax cuts

less benefits = more "choice"

more pollution = greater cleanup

lack of collaborator's relationship with Osama means Terrorist sponsor against US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, papau,
they are blowing smoke up our butts in order to muddy the waters. Create a controversy about the DOCUMENTS in order to take the focus off of AWOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC