Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another nutso Killian document forgery theory--

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:32 AM
Original message
Another nutso Killian document forgery theory--
Maybe the Bushies or their agents had perfectly good documents & then created & released forgeries with the same content in order to discredit the information in the original documents. This pre-emptively weakens all the other evidence, including witness testimony. Now you have witnesses testifying to the truth of stuff that is contained in "forged" documents, thereby compromising the credibility of their testimony.

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. IF...
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 07:41 AM by Tandalayo_Scheisskop
And that is a big If, and I am not convinced that they are forgeries, especially after reading the histories of the IBM typewriters, <gaaaaaasssssp>that is how it went down, then it is one of the bigger and more sophisticated ratfucks in the history of American politics. And your theory may not be far off the Rovian mark.

But then, who are we talking about? Karl Rove, King Ratfucker.

But remember, besides a lot of loud speculation by FreePeeZ and pundits and a lot of "Eckspurts", nothing truly substantive has been revealed. Just FUD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. My bet is that they're not forgeries, but ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. They are not forgeries.
* is blowing smoke up our butts. Their tactic is to always muddy the waters to hide the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Whoa!!!!! Careful Untwisting yourself Jackpine, you hurt yourself.
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 07:55 AM by maine_raptor
Had to read that post twice to get it:

Sorry, naw, don't buy it, that dog doesn't hunt, etc.

The idea that Bushies created forgeries, then released same to discredit same is a little like saying the Nov 22 killers first shot JFK in the head, then staged Dealy Plaza to cover it up.


Extra stong tinfoil, I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, I DID say it was nutso.
But somehow just twisted enough to carry a Rovian flavor.

The analogy isn't Dealey Plaza, but the case in which Rove apparently planted a true Bush/coke story with James Hatfield & then discredited Hatfield as an ex-felon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yea, ya did, give you credit there
That Rove/coke story trick is an old one to political operatives.

Plant a story, then discredit the source, especially when that story harms your guy. Insulation.

Mark Hana used the same trick to stop stories about McKinley's whoring around back in the late 1890's.

Not "genius" on Rove's part, just a good knowledge of the gamesmanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC