Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House says "doesn't matter whether true or not"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:19 AM
Original message
White House says "doesn't matter whether true or not"...
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 11:20 AM by Flubadubya
Staight from Susan Malveaux's lips. She says the white house is now saying that the "President is already 'defined' in American's minds, and it won't matter whether the CBS documents are TRUE or NOT."

Oooh, boy! Well, that 'splains it doesn't it? Getting the propaganda in place already that even when proven true, it won't matter to the American public. Watch out folks, here it comes... the really big spin! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately, there is some truth to that.
I don't think a lot of people care at this point. He's already been President for 4 years. People care about this stuff when you're seeking election because it's an indicator as to how you'll do. But we already know how he'll do, so it's sort of irrelevant at this point. It'll change a few minds, sure, but I don't think this sort of thing will have as great an impact on Bush as the asshole swifties did on Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Only for the 18-30 cohort
People much older than that have at least a dim recollection of what Vietnam was all about, even if they spent much of it in diapers.

The point has to be made by the few Democratic talking heads that are allowed on the major media that it's about character, not about Vietnam. Kerry did his duty and returned to try to get his band of brothers home from that awful war. Bush was a party boy who shirked his duty and got bought out of the consequences by a doting but corrupt father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. I agree, this will hurt Bush...
I think Americans already have a sense of what Bush is: part of a connected, privileged family. Americans know George failed in everything he did only to be bailed out by rich, powerful friends. This incident only adds to the that long list of "accomplishments" and helps to clarify his character:

School--used connections to get into Yale;
Business--used connection$ to bail him out of failed ventures;
2000 Campaign--used connections to steal White House
etc.

Now voters have yet another facet to add to this view of Bush: connections to get out of Vietnam and avoid punishment when he decided to ignore orders and get out of the TANG.

They will put all of this together and wonder what powerful, rich connection is actually running this country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. That's exactly what the media says...
must be true. Of course, the media NEVER really strongly questioned whether or not the SBVT crap was fake or not, they just put it out their with little or no scrutiny. However, when it comes to Bush, they will PUSH with all their might the "facts" (Hah!) that these documents are faked. It is SO obvious which side they are on.

AND... the American people will buy their Bushit hook, line, and sinker. It is not even so much the right wing operatives who are doing this, but the fact that the American media so willingly and gleefuly plays their part in the dysinformation.

So, you don't think there is anything that will change peoples' minds about Bush at this point? No truth scathing enough, nothing at all? If that's so, then let's all pack up and go home. It's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. No, and I don't appreciate you putting words in my mouth.
I didn't say we couldn't change people's minds about Bush AT ALL. I just don't think AWOL is going to do it. If you actually read what I wrote, it's because these kinds of issues are supposedly a predictor for how one will perform in office. We already know how he's performed, so what's the point of it now? It would've been better if we had dug into this in 2000.

The point is, there are 4 years worth of perfect material that we can and should be using against George Bush, and the 4 years I'm referring to weren't during Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. You're really right...
and I didn't mean to put words in your mouth, sorry. I was originally going to respond to your post with the exact point you made that this should have all been scrutinized and a big issue made of it in 2000. But, just like now, the media was then also covering George's ass.

I'm just frustrated as hell at the media right now, and the gullability of the American people. Please pardon my presumptious comments. Didn't mean to offend. I think we're really on the same page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Andrea Mitchell had an old tape of an interview with *
where Dan Quale's guard service was mentioned. Bush said that he used connections to get into the guard, lots of people did. The tape was aired the night the new documents story broke, then it disappeared.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sieg Heil, baby! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Translation "already defined"
"They've drank the Kool Aid"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. lots of stuff doesn't matter
doesn't matter if we get Osama
doesn't matter if there's no WMD
everyone knows, deficits don't matter
etc. etc.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. THIS is a good MEME.
Well worth repeating. Steers the "story" straight back to where it belongs. It's to QUESTION dUBYA. NOT to question THOSE WHO question dubya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. One more thing...
Do you have a link yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I don't know if there is a transcript or a link per se....
It was just Susanne Malveaux talking to Wolf Blitzer on the White House grounds. If this is the WH's new talking point, you will hear it aplenty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Also, Kerry's camp is being coy,saying "We don't have a statement *today.*
Something is up, and I have a feeling it's going to break against Bush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. That pretty much settles it
The documents are real and the White House knows it. They saw a possibility for questioning the authenticity and ran with it to put doubt in people's minds. Then they come out with the big lie that it doesn't matter before CBS proves beyond any doubt the documents are real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. That's the way I read it Walt...
They know the authenticity will be proved, and they are trying to get out in front of the truth (again) with the bigger lie that they hope sells!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. IMHO, this can only mean that...
CBS has more to release and is playing chess, not checkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. Of course they have to say that because they know they are not
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 11:28 AM by Kerryfan
forgeries. They destroyed copies of some of these documents in Bush's files in 97.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Yes. I think this is the clearest sign yet that the documents aren't
forgeries. They fed the forgery bit trhu Fox News to buy a little time. Now THEY have determined these were not forgeries ro, at least, the reasons that have been given, and they're playing a follow-up (defensive) position.


Hell . . . this guy had to have more than 4 memos typed, right? I mean his files are chock full of similar type fonts &c. All one need do is find another . . . about anything . . . water quality, for Christ's sake! Anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. To a certain extent, I agree
I think it's a costly distraction. People can argue about this ad infinitum without determining anything either way. In the meantime, no one is paying any attention to the issues, on which Bush doesn't have a leg to stand on.

The guy has fucked up for four years on every aspect of his reign - the economy, the environment, security, health care, etc. But what do we focus on? His NG record. Again.

Kerry has so much more to offer on the issues and we're arguing about type fonts! :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. So, we just let the WH and the media...
convince the American people that someone has maliciously lied about our honorable president and made all this stuff up, and it surely wasn't any republican that did it... so, that just leaves us traitorous Dems to blame, right?

So, if we just don't respond to their lies it will all be OK as long as we stay on message with the bread and butter issues. If only that were so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. Not to luff der fuehrer is a great disgrace....
What's hilarious is that the GOP's entire campaign is basically Sally Field writ large..."You like me. You really really like me..."

Which I see precious little evidence for outside of the natterings of right wing pundits. Certainly around here (in a largely Republican part of the state) I don't see much personal love for pResident Toot....what support there is based on hatred of other Americans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. Scott McClellan continues in a similar vein in 9/10/04 Press Gaggle
White House Press Gaggle

Press Gaggle by Scott McClellan

September 10, 2004

Aboard Air Force One

En route Huntington, West Virginia

9:59 A.M. EDT

<snip>
Q Scott, on the National Guard documents, do you have any suspicions about their authenticity?

MR. McCLELLAN: We don't know whether the documents were fabricated or are authentic. You know, the media has talked to independent experts who have raised questions about the documents. CBS has not disclosed where the documents came from. But, regardless, it does not -- the documents do not change the facts. The President met his obligations and was honorably discharged. And the one thing that is clear is the timing and the coordination going on here. There is an orchestrated effort by Democrats and the Kerry campaign to tear down the President because of the direction the polls are moving. And it's not surprising that we're seeing the same old recycled attacks. The Democrats are determined to throw the kitchen sink at us, and I suspect this is just the beginning.
</snip> (emphasis mine)

More stuff in the Gaggle - "Fortunate Son" comes up, and Scotty calls Hatfield "an ex-convict that was widely discredited in the 2000 campaign." It's interesting to see that their bringing this up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC