Has the WH or the Pentagon claimed the documents to be forgeries?

[spotbird]

It seems to me that they'd be the first to cry foul, right? But they aren't saying that. Low-life surrogates and the liberal media are making the claim, but not the WH.

They don't even deny the contents.

Shouldn't that be a clue?

[papau]

1. true-but our media does not think - it just follows the Rove spin of the

day

:-(

[seabeyond]

2. they hadnt said anything, and now whether forgery or not

doesnt matter. american people have already "defined" bush

saying there doesnt have to be a picture of truth knowing who bush is. they have bought the repug story who bush is

[rangerfan]

3. They don't have to. The "liberal" media is doing it for them.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!

[Name removed]

4. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[spotbird]

6. Assuming the documents were new to them, the only

way they could know of their validity is from the contents.

The contents of the memos are not in dispute, ironically only the authenticity of the documents. Interesting twist.

[seabeyond]

5. gregory on msnbc just said

that the bush campaign is secretly just in giggle that the question has been put out on these documents keeping them off the accusation. that they are just thrilled with it and said they are put out the questioning of it