Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dan repeats the questions, earlier stated on CNN.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 05:42 PM
Original message
Dan repeats the questions, earlier stated on CNN.
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 05:55 PM by speedoo
Now talking about the allegations re. the documents.

Refuting the various "problems", one by one.

Quotes the expert they used, says the "problems" are probably the result of faxing, scanning, etc.

The handwriting expert is good. Says the signature is the most compelling sign of authenticity.

Interviews the Killian friend who says the documents are consistent with his knowledge of Killian and the "corruptive" atmosphere of the National Guard at the time.

Now another guy who says the documents simply reflect what we already know, and says the WH has not itself discredited the documents, probably because they know they are real.

Simply fantastic.

I have more respect for Dan Rather than all the other TV "journalists", past and present, combined (leaving out the one and only Edward R. Murrow). Dan is the King, the rest are whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey CNN........
If you want to see what journalism looks like.....tune in to Dan Rather!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. CNN relies on RW bloogers (powerline.com) for their news....... TRASH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whoosh! That last statement of yours covers a lot of ground.
I can't help but wonder what Edward R. Murrow would have done with the last 4 years. Or even Walter Cronkite. Murrow was a major factor in the downfall of McCarthy, remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're right of course.
I got a little carried away. Original post edited. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phish420 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Video of this now on my site
http://bushlies2.us
will autoplay on the main page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC